It's because Navy is scum.In post 3221, Kelvin Smith wrote:Yeah, and if all goes as planned, that might be what we lynch tomorrow. But lynching someone just because they are lurking when there are other, more reasonable lynches to make is just bad play. Math was a more reasonable lynch.
Okay, when I don't cop and say, you can report me.In post 3224, Kelvin Smith wrote:I feel like Copping a dead person or purposely not Copping in this setup is gamethrowing.
That slot isn't being replaced. It gets passed the replace spot, does a stupid post like that and stays in the game.In post 3223, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:OK? We can just let the slot get replaced.
She's probably scum but you're acting like she wouldn't play like that as either alignment and I'd rather lynch a slot with readable content.
This makes my point stronger.In post 3229, Kelvin Smith wrote:Guys, what's the site policy regarding asking for another player to be replaced in a game? Like, I don't know about the rest of you, but if we can all request Almost50 to replace Vedith, I think we should. The only issue I have there is that he might be scum and this is just a shitty tactic to not be useful.
Navy needs to be replaced to. Because non-content posts should not be considered an acceptable substitute to actually playing the game.In post 3227, Vedith wrote:That slot isn't being replaced. It gets passed the replace spot, does a stupid post like that and stays in the game.In post 3223, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:OK? We can just let the slot get replaced.
She's probably scum but you're acting like she wouldn't play like that as either alignment and I'd rather lynch a slot with readable content.
And people seem to be okay with this, but not okay with me telling them how shit they are for letting it happen.
Yet I don't see you pushing for this.In post 3232, Kelvin Smith wrote:Navy needs to be replaced to. Because non-content posts should not be considered an acceptable substitute to actually playing the game.
I want both of you replaced.In post 3230, Vedith wrote:This makes my point stronger.In post 3229, Kelvin Smith wrote:Guys, what's the site policy regarding asking for another player to be replaced in a game? Like, I don't know about the rest of you, but if we can all request Almost50 to replace Vedith, I think we should. The only issue I have there is that he might be scum and this is just a shitty tactic to not be useful.
Is okay with someone doing nothing in the game and wasting a spot, but as soon as I refuse to follow a plan, wants me replaced.
I was trying to be as open ended with your action as I couldIn post 3230, Vedith wrote:This makes my point stronger.In post 3229, Kelvin Smith wrote:Guys, what's the site policy regarding asking for another player to be replaced in a game? Like, I don't know about the rest of you, but if we can all request Almost50 to replace Vedith, I think we should. The only issue I have there is that he might be scum and this is just a shitty tactic to not be useful.
Is okay with someone doing nothing in the game and wasting a spot, but as soon as I refuse to follow a plan, wants me replaced.
No, because Navy is about to receive her third prod, which I assume means she'll be force-replaced anyway, so I didn't feel the need to go through extraneous channels. But your threats of gamethrowing and insults because you don' like the choices everyone else have made are something that is actively toxic to the gamestate. You've added approximately as much value to this game since I replaced in as Navy, so in my eyes, you are equally worthy of replacement.In post 3233, Vedith wrote:Yet I don't see you pushing for this.In post 3232, Kelvin Smith wrote:Navy needs to be replaced to. Because non-content posts should not be considered an acceptable substitute to actually playing the game.
Because once again, your play is shit.
So your site encourages people to not play.In post 3238, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually yes we do have chronic lurkers there. Like, my first game there were several. The most egregious IMO was BlueDrago. Dude hardcore lurked until he gladiated then he was sorta active. There's no real activity rules on my home site.
Site policy is you can have a player force replaced for breaking site rules. That's it.In post 3229, Kelvin Smith wrote:Guys, what's the site policy regarding asking for another player to be replaced in a game? Like, I don't know about the rest of you, but if we can all request Almost50 to replace Vedith, I think we should. The only issue I have there is that he might be scum and this is just a shitty tactic to not be useful.
No, it's not acceptable to lynch. It's acceptable to replace and depending how often it happens, might be acceptable to ban.In post 3236, Vedith wrote:17 real days, 5 posts (0 really).
And it's acceptable to not be lynched.
Is this the same on your home site, Gamma?
Navy should be on more than 3 prods.In post 3239, Kelvin Smith wrote:No, because Navy is about to receive her third prod, which I assume means she'll be force-replaced anyway, so I didn't feel the need to go through extraneous channels. But your threats of gamethrowing and insults because you don' like the choices everyone else have made are something that is actively toxic to the gamestate. You've added approximately as much value to this game since I replaced in as Navy, so in my eyes, you are equally worthy of replacement.
Whatever, I'm done with this conversation. I'm not going to turn this thread into anymore of a toxic cesspool than it already is.In post 3244, Vedith wrote:Navy should be on more than 3 prods.In post 3239, Kelvin Smith wrote:No, because Navy is about to receive her third prod, which I assume means she'll be force-replaced anyway, so I didn't feel the need to go through extraneous channels. But your threats of gamethrowing and insults because you don' like the choices everyone else have made are something that is actively toxic to the gamestate. You've added approximately as much value to this game since I replaced in as Navy, so in my eyes, you are equally worthy of replacement.
Navy should have been replaced, but because of the amount of replaces in this game wasn't.
So I can tell you what happens tomorrow.
Navy posts "Yo" and everyone goes "Oh lets lynch this stick!"
And yeah you keep saying that I've added nothing to this game. That shows how much of a shit player you are.
Because I need 314 votes to be lynched and sooo since people don't want to lynch scum they lynched me instead.In post 3241, RadiantCowbells wrote:why did titus suddenly decide that math was hard bussed after she got lynched but before the flip?
You post as if you're confirmed town.In post 3245, Kelvin Smith wrote:Nobody lynch Vedith because he's being difficult. Lynch him if you legitimately think he's the last member of the scum team and don't let him get to LyLo.
It doesn't encourage it. People get pushed for lurking, and bad cases get blacklisted. It's not like they just let it slide. It just has more lax requirements.In post 3240, Vedith wrote:So your site encourages people to not play.In post 3238, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually yes we do have chronic lurkers there. Like, my first game there were several. The most egregious IMO was BlueDrago. Dude hardcore lurked until he gladiated then he was sorta active. There's no real activity rules on my home site.
Good to know.
No, I post as if I might die, so I want people to remember that if I do. I can just say that shit myself Day 4, if I'm alive. I'm not confirmed town until I'm dead or a dead Cop confirms it.In post 3247, Vedith wrote:You post as if you're confirmed town.In post 3245, Kelvin Smith wrote:Nobody lynch Vedith because he's being difficult. Lynch him if you legitimately think he's the last member of the scum team and don't let him get to LyLo.
I'm going to remind you, you're not.
But you already know that anyway.