Large Normal 205: Sibling's Love and Quarrel [Endgame]

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:23 pm

In post 1072, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 1064, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think it's pass Lily's bedtime so you'll be waiting a while

Tryna vote jjh when u see this ?

How many votes do you realistically think we can get?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:36 pm

In post 1075, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1072, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 1064, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think it's pass Lily's bedtime so you'll be waiting a while

Tryna vote jjh when u see this ?
How many votes do you realistically think we can get?

Fuck you mean. We move to lynch scum whether are not people were inclined one way or another, if everyone wants to stagnate on their own reads it's going to be their problem

The main wagons are Creature Carca and Uzi? Yeah no one in this game can say shit to me at all

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:37 pm

Oh my mistake Realeo is a wagon. Did the stars line up and show you he was scum cause I haven't seen anyone articulate decently how his posts do

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:50 pm

I get the feeling no one is actually going to budge though.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:51 pm

In post 1068, Vedith wrote:Shut up, LQ!

Not sure you actually understand the intention of my post, hence I think this reaction a bit Scummy because it looks like you could be dealing with a guilty conscious.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:52 pm

VOTE: JJH

Fucks sake

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:53 pm

In post 1078, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I get the feeling no one is actually going to budge though.

I might switch granted there is a case that takes into account how jj's behavior is Scummy for him and not just because he is bad.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:56 pm

I think the initial premise that he could scum read Vedith off of NaI Vedith posting is bullshit to me. Whether it was just false confidence or scum confidence, just go to the first two pages. You cannot tell me anything Vedith did there was AI save for the no lynch vote and dare I say that's not AI for him... JJ was the one person I thought was pushing the Vedith wagon seriously

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:58 pm

Anyone who claims to know Vediths play knows he plays lynch bait as town. Why then if you are going to do a premature push is it on Vedith of all people?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:04 am

VOTE: jjh927

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:05 am

Also did I read that whole exchange wrong or did Creature and JJH talk about different definitions of shading for 3 hours

Transcend · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:07 am

realeo says i'm a shit player so i'm just gonna sheep someone

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:08 am

So Zach, I see you are trying to convince me. Thing is, it doesn't meet the criteria I talked about.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:10 am

In post 16, jjh927 wrote:Oh wow this is actually scum!Vedith good job

In post 32, jjh927 wrote:RVS isn't pointless and Vedith is actually scum. I wasn't joking.

Your hunch is shit.

In post 36, jjh927 wrote:Vedith has a different tone to his bullshittery when he's scum to when he's town, and his very first post is of the scum!Vedith variety

Claiming to know Vedith this well is more disingenuous than just bad but whatever(I know him that well and I told JJ he wasn't making sense)

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:11 am

Like this guy used tone as an indicator for FUCKING VEDITH.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:12 am

And he's on an ass wagon now so I feel pretty decent about this

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:15 am

In post 1088, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 16, jjh927 wrote:Oh wow this is actually scum!Vedith good job

In post 32, jjh927 wrote:RVS isn't pointless and Vedith is actually scum. I wasn't joking.

Your hunch is shit.

In post 36, jjh927 wrote:Vedith has a different tone to his bullshittery when he's scum to when he's town, and his very first post is of the scum!Vedith variety

Claiming to know Vedith this well is more disingenuous than just bad but whatever(I know him that well and I told JJ he wasn't making sense)

I disagree that it is Scummy over him just being bad. If you can describe this in more detail how you came to the conclusion that jj is Scummy over just really bad, I'm all ears.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:24 am

JJ isn't bad though from what I've seen and heard.

Realeo · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:33 am

In post 1086, Transcend wrote:realeo says i'm a shit player so i'm just gonna sheep someone

Did I?

I said you're good. The fact that I used your read in the past and it worked means it's good.

It's just you keep forgetting to press the "Flip my read" button.

Why do you townread Transcend that hard?

Genuine effort, imo. Something that I never saw.

Nice subtle dig. I really need a good explanation for this

Given how you respond to other people's reasoning, my answer won't satisfy you so I won't bother.

Not sure what is wrong with Curc. First impression is meh but not really that bad.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:35 am

In post 1092, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:JJ isn't bad though from what I've seen and heard.

That just complicates matters, it doesn't make him Scum.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:59 am

Basically, I don't think just because jj had a Scum read on Vedith early in the game means that he is Scum. I am going to need more than that. Currently I have him as Null/Lean Scum, but I would really like to stay on Kaboose for dodging the game.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:07 am

Activity is an awful reason to vote someone.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:10 am

In post 1096, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Activity is an awful reason to vote someone.

Only when they have said they are V/LA and haven't said they will be contributing shortly.

Narna · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:11 am

Guys Realeo

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:12 am

In post 327, Kaboose wrote:
In post 306, Mulch wrote:Caboose:

Let's start with this shit, when in response to me telling him "you could be derping as town" he responds with "how about YOU could be derping as town." ??? Does this make any sense to anyone else? In what fucking way have I been derping shit?

It was just a joke. You insulted me, as you keep doing. I thought it was friendly at first so I sort of just responded with a "No you!" post... Sorry you missed it.

In this post, they do so many incredibly scummy things. 1) They completely reverse their read on Transcend because "he's a goofball." 2) He literally says that Transcend and I are TvS in a fucking scummy manipulative way. He then proceeds to VOTE me, which screams of trying to appeal to transcend and manipulative transcend into thinking that we are TvS and that oh no he needs to vote me. 3) The REASON he gave for voting me was for making a pre flip analysis, which a) Was NOT scummy because it was a pre flip contigent on Transcend being SCUM and B) IS OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING HE DOES NOT scumread people for because he just fucking did it to Transcend and I right this instant.

It's the timing of when you did it compared to when I did it. When you did it there were 100 less posts,
how could you come to that conclusion so fast? I actually gave a reason as to why I thought it was TvS, something you didn't do.

At first I thought he could just be dumbass town ( I tend to townread people that attack me, but not so much anymore now that I've become more and more of an easy target) Here.

Really, enough with the insults already. Care to reach for some heart strings to pull on a little more?

Then I realized he was just scum for the reasons I outlined below.

He then CLAIMS TO 1) Not know what pocketing is 2) not be able to recognize it, and also, remember, vouched for a no lynch, yet he also claims to NOT BE A NEW PLAYER, and also can also know what a pre flip analysis is and how it is generally perceived to be scumny,

Are you scum reading me for not knowing the exact definition of pocketing? Because I still don't know what it means. I've literally never heard it before. So because I'm not a new player I can't have the opinion of preferring a no lynch on D1 to other outcomes?

The irony of this is that he is faking a scumread for a pre flip because it is one of the fucking easiest things to sucmread someone in the world. It requires no thought. It requires nothing except to point it out. THe thing he did not realize, is that
mine was not scummy.

I'm not faking a scum read. I do scum read you. And nothing you've done has changed this. You're likely scum, and if I'm somehow wrong I'd be still happy to lynch you because you seem like someone who is literally impossible to work with.

I explained this WELL to transcend here.

Finally, he, if it wasnt obvious enough that he was trying to dome transcend and I, asks transcend to vote me here RIGHT after reversing his read for, remember, being a goofball.

Also, bonus points, he keeps trying to derail my arguement by saying I'm personally insulting him.

You are insulting me quite a bit. That's literally a thing. I've not even attacked you in any other way than to scum read you and you've insulted me numerous times.

And also, final final, this thing is so fucking manipulative right here when he said I scum claimed here, for, listen to this:

"Mulch just called me scummy for doing something they did".

See for yourself.

Like if I'm so scum, and I'm also the only vote on you, why are you acting like you're trying to convince the last person who isn't voting us to choose me over you? If I'm so scum why are you trying so hard right now?

In post 704, Kaboose wrote:Christ.. So much to read..

Well, here goes...

Hey real question here though, as far as posts go do people prefer the "grab em all" and make one post or one at a time? I can never decide which I prefer. Grab em all is cleaner but I feel I keep up with things better one at a time. Is there an etiquette?

In post 1065, Kaboose wrote:I will catch up with this as soon as possible.

This is why I want to keep my vote on Kaboose.