In post 596, ThinkBig wrote:Hi everyone! My name is ThinkBig and I will be your friendly backup moderator. I will be taking over in Agent Sparkles absence. My colour will be orange.
I'll try to keep that in mind if I ever ask your opinion on it.In post 598, bombcat wrote:hi havingfitz i can't say i approve of your picture but i will try not to hold it against you
But then, like the voice of God, he posts this while I'm in the middle of writing this post... This vote could be scum motivated. It's pure, self-admitted OMGUS. If it were an isolated incident I wouldn't say anything but he also has an OMGUS scum read on jjh. He could have called jjh a mason so that nobody would think anything about him dying in the night.bombcat wrote:VOTE: egg
you're voting me with an excuse instead of a read, there's no way you think i think the masons will out because i called jjh727 a mason
He's scummy. If I was policy voting, it would be too hard to choose in this game.In post 591, Transcend wrote:Is bomb actually scummy or do you just have an issue with him?
You have people talking about masons. That makes it MUCH easier to tell who is or is not a mason. I'm pretty sure that was your goal. I'm not even trying to figure it out and already know of one person who can't be a mason.bombcat wrote:you're voting me with an excuse instead of a read, there's no way you think i think the masons will out because i called jjh727 a mason
I agree about the OMGUS (at least on me, not sure on jjh). The last bit is interesting and not something I'd have thought of.wave wrote:This vote could be scum motivated. It's pure, self-admitted OMGUS. If it were an isolated incident I wouldn't say anything but he also has an OMGUS scum read on jjh. He could have called jjh a mason so that nobody would think anything about him dying in the night.
Actually that would have been wave at the time I voted. If you were the easiest lynch, I wouldn't be having so much trouble pushing it.bombcat wrote: i am the lowest hanging fruit
You didn't read it then because I re-evaluated a few reads (connor and flubber come to mind) while I was reading and I feel like I made good points against sesq.bombcat wrote:I think egg's post 547 shows effort on a surface level sort of bordering on narrating the game, i don't think he's thinking too hard about anyone's alignment
you are LITERALLY honeydicking wave because he acted like he was gonna flip on me with a little encouragementIn post 610, Egg wrote: I agree about the OMGUS (at least on me, not sure on jjh). The last bit is interesting and not something I'd have thought of.
what is that even supposed to mean?In post 581, wavemode wrote:Why do you feel the need to constantly re-justify this vote? You sound like someone trying to protect themself from an eventual town flip.In post 576, GameNBurger wrote:Yeah Im still feeling the wave lynch
I feel like I might have been played and he's the kind of scum that intentionally likes picking fights that are meaningless
>implying scum are always scummy and town are always townyIn post 582, Egg wrote:Outting the masons is a pro-scum move. So yes, I think he's scum for trying to do it.In post 573, Sesq wrote:Yeah, but you put him as your top scumread
and that's just really naiive
maybe he is, probably he isnt.
He's fishing for reactions.echo wrote:bombcat isn't trying to out the masons... he said one person was obv mason and probably wasn't even right. it's not like he's mason hunting
you're acting as if omgus is a bad thingIn post 604, wavemode wrote:None of the rolefishing plays you guys seem to think bombcat is making are remotely worth getting lynched over, putting the scum team at an instant disadvantage.
But then, like the voice of God, he posts this while I'm in the middle of writing this post... This vote could be scum motivated. It's pure, self-admitted OMGUS. If it were an isolated incident I wouldn't say anything but he also has an OMGUS scum read on jjh. He could have called jjh a mason so that nobody would think anything about him dying in the night.bombcat wrote:VOTE: egg
you're voting me with an excuse instead of a read, there's no way you think i think the masons will out because i called jjh727 a mason
you're already dressing up your language to diminish the importance of those postsIn post 609, wavemode wrote:Welp that's all I got. Still very skeptical that bomb is scum here.
you did none of these thingsIn post 610, Egg wrote: You didn't read it then because I re-evaluated a few reads (connor and flubber come to mind) while I was reading and I feel like I made good points against sesq.
I've been pushing hard todayif someone makes a bullshit case on you you vote them. no shame in that, and it really looks like you're just trying to buzzword around to get a lynch on them.
combined with earlier asspulls i cannot believe you are pushing this lynch in honesty
Oh, okay now it makes sense. You wanted to sheep your buddy but needed a good reason to. Alright, good play I guess. Probably what I'd do in your situation.i was kinda unsure before but yeah i dont think you can be town anymore
VOTE: wavemode
i dont really trust what you sayIn post 615, wavemode wrote:Yes, OMGUS is a bad thing when used to simply discredit the person making a case against you, rather than actually responding to their points. But I don't really need to explain that to you, do I Sesq? You know I don't want bombcat lynched.
These two lines are interesting:
I've been pushing hard todayif someone makes a bullshit case on you you vote them. no shame in that, and it really looks like you're just trying to buzzword around to get a lynch on them.
combined with earlier asspulls i cannot believe you are pushing this lynch in honestyagainstlynching bombcat. "if someone makes a bullshit case on you you vote them" - really? Like bombcat's BS case against me? So you should be praising me for wanting him dead. Except... I don't want him dead. I think he's town. Wait, now you've got me confused.
Oh, okay now it makes sense. You wanted to sheep your buddy but needed a good reason to. Alright, good play I guess. Probably what I'd do in your situation.i was kinda unsure before but yeah i dont think you can be town anymore
VOTE: wavemode
its funny because hypocrisyIn post 616, wavemode wrote:Though I'd probably find better reasons...
...and you've concluded this from one post I made, putting forth one theory, even though the whole rest of my ISO has been in defense of him? lol ok buddyIn post 617, Sesq wrote:i think that you secretly want him lynched based on how you are framing things
You're the one who said this and I agreed with it wholeheartedly. You were either lying about being suspicious of me for not having alternate theories, or you're lying about being suspicious of me now. Likely, you're lying about both. But you can't have it both ways.In post 555, Sesq wrote:if an argument always makes sense in every context then it is pointless. mafia, and logic even, 101.
Forgot to answer this. I actually thought his post said something different than it does so I had a theory about it that doesn't apply anymore. Sorry GameNBurger.In post 614, Sesq wrote:what is that even supposed to mean?In post 581, wavemode wrote:Why do you feel the need to constantly re-justify this vote? You sound like someone trying to protect themself from an eventual town flip.In post 576, GameNBurger wrote:Yeah Im still feeling the wave lynch
I feel like I might have been played and he's the kind of scum that intentionally likes picking fights that are meaningless
Honestly, the more I look at this, the more I don't like it.In post 547, Egg wrote:Reads, town on top, scum on bottom:
Egg
Raya
Gamenburger
Waveform
Sunchild
Transcend
Connor
Flubber
Echo
Jjh (not scum with bomb)
Mantichora
Sesq
Bombcat
Vote Bombcat
I didn't miss it but since there was so little content within his posts I thought of it more as spam than actually trying to find the masons athough I definitely agree that hunting the masons rather than scum is a problem and something town would not do.In post 565, Egg wrote: Raya, if you think the case against bombcat is spam, you must have missed him trying to out the masons.