Ewww... AND Steel hopped on.
VOTE: Realeo
Your case seems like it just came from thin air. What you're missing about Narna's approach to Carcalilly and your whole approach to that fucking wagon is that:
- Some people scum read her predecessor(this factors in for a different reason)
- Carca's replace-in was actually objectively shitty...
(This is from a person that townread Sunlit Diamond. So when the replace happened I actually had to put in effort to sort and Carcalilly has produced reads at this point that would be more useful as like... fucking stock market prices than a reads list AFAIC)
What you do here is like misrep the whole ... perception of the wagon
In post 1626, Realeo wrote:@Everone at Carc's wagon:
Why am I not scummier than Carc? Like, if the case is "there is something wrong about Carc," then isn't I'm definitely worse than Carc?
What the fuck is this? It reads like you skimmed when all that stuff happened because the scenario you're outlining is not the same as what happened.. this is WAY too vague.. Carca's posting was pinging a few people and it was even worse because some of them thought her predecessor was obv scum, whereas some of them didn't.
In post 1639, Realeo wrote:
Because I feel cases at Carc's is over blown to the point "Why I'm not the leading wagon now?"
It's like the only reason why Carc's wagon picked up is because more people town read me compared to Carc so Carc is easier to be mislynched, especially that there is day chat in this game where mafia can coordinate.
Um... what?
Pretty sure our 3 main wagons have been Creature, Realeo, and... SD/Carca
The reason why one of these wagons picked up is because the person in question started pinging people, not because anyone was specifically gauging mislynches IMO. This is inherently dishonest. First of all, the way Carca replaced in wasn't helpful. I know we were shitposting but she like did half a catch up and I still dont know if Im waiting on the other half? Plus her posts were very sporadic and shit, and some of her offhanded comments were scummy. She didn't offer analysis. I don't know if Carca is an analysis type of player. I thought of that slot as a possible derp town ML so I wanted to like SORT sort it but what Carca's given me so far is like... minimal information. I just finished a game with her but I'll talk about that later
Largest problem here is you're pretending like this was a "case" type wagon. It's not. It was a spur of the moment type wagon which built momentum and how said player reacted to that wagon entirely dictated how people read her.
In post 1659, Realeo wrote:I felt that the people's case at Carc is as unpersuasive as Mulch's case at Kaboose but the fact Carc's case gets double the vote from Mulch's case suggest that mafia is prolly hoping into the wagon and Mulch is town (for making scum not comfortable to jump to his case or casing against scum!Kaboose hence why it doesn't get traction)
Um... Mulch and Kaboose is an entirely different ballpark compared to this shit. They had a fucking yell fest, for one. That might be a TINY fucking part of the variable.
What? This is like comparing apples to TNT
Sorry, I think that Realeo is full of shit. Before the Narna push he "sorts" Carcalilly by questioning and answering in a way that doesn't really mean anything nor was relevant to the original reasons why people were scumreading her... literally produces nothing.
In post 1727, Realeo wrote:
VOTE: Narna
I'm bored. Creature's wagon is not picking up. Trying new one.
So you're bored and your first step is to go to the Carca wagon and pick the player who is scummiest
The point is, regardless of Carca's alignment I still think you're scum because you fake sorted her and wrote it off as a lynch that was happening for "no reason".
Then you stretch a push on Narna with a complete misrep of the entire Carca wagon. Yeah, fuck out of here, lynch that. I think Steel looks worse for that vote but I want him to comment on the situation.
