Large Normal 205: Sibling's Love and Quarrel [Endgame]

Mulch · Post Post #3350 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:21 pm

In post 3139, Narna wrote:A guilty, neato VOTE: Mulch

This.

1) If they were town and thought I had a real guilty, they vote Transcend. Scum faking a guilty day 2 is suicidal.

2) This clearly shows that they knew it was a reaction test.

3) This shows that they meant to press me for the fake guilty.

This is scum.

VOTE: Narna

Mulch · Post Post #3351 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:22 pm

In post 3349, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:None of what Mulch is quoting is AI

Nos purely beliving a fake test is towny.

Mulch · Post Post #3352 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:22 pm

On the flip side, if Transcend actually flips scum Nos is incriminated more for this, but w/e, we can cross that bridge if we ever get to it.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3353 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:23 pm

Why can't town scum read you for reaction testing?

Mulch · Post Post #3354 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:24 pm

In post 3353, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Why can't town scum read you for reaction testing?

How did they know it was a reaction test?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3355 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:24 pm

I knew it was a reaction test as well but I wanted to be sure. Why am I not a scum read?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #3356 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:24 pm

that shit was dumb obvious bro

Mulch · Post Post #3357 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:24 pm

"Ooh a guilty."

*votes mulch*

Mulch · Post Post #3358 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:24 pm

In post 3355, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I knew it was a reaction test as well but I wanted to be sure. Why am I not a scum read?

How did you know it was a reaction test?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3359 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:24 pm

In post 3354, Mulch wrote:
In post 3353, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Why can't town scum read you for reaction testing?
How did they know it was a reaction test?

Behavior and tone.

Mulch · Post Post #3360 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:25 pm

In post 3356, Zachstralkita wrote:that shit was dumb obvious bro

How, until I made that post about not lynching him overnight?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3361 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:25 pm

In post 3358, Mulch wrote:
In post 3355, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I knew it was a reaction test as well but I wanted to be sure. Why am I not a scum read?
How did you know it was a reaction test?

Behavior and tone.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3362 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:25 pm

Lol Mulch wtf

Mulch · Post Post #3363 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:25 pm

In post 3359, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 3354, Mulch wrote:
In post 3353, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Why can't town scum read you for reaction testing?
How did they know it was a reaction test?
Behavior and tone.

Why did they say "ooh a guilty" then before voting me? That means they thought it was a guilty

And even if it wasn't a guilty, how the fuck can they vote me for having a reaction test?

Mulch · Post Post #3364 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:25 pm

Was I that obvious?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #3365 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:26 pm

In post 3107, Mulch wrote:Don't majority, want to see reactions

This post is like 2 posts under your vote

It kind of had the same effect on me

Zachstralkita · Post Post #3366 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:26 pm

Creature for some reason is trying to analyze the guilties way too,.... technically?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3367 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:27 pm

In post 3363, Mulch wrote:
In post 3359, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 3354, Mulch wrote:
In post 3353, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Why can't town scum read you for reaction testing?
How did they know it was a reaction test?
Behavior and tone.
Why did they say "ooh a guilty" then before voting me? That means they thought it was a guilty

And even if it wasn't a guilty, how the fuck can they vote me for having a reaction test?

Sarcasm.

Reaction testing is a thing some people find scummy.

Mulch · Post Post #3368 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:27 pm

Why did he say "ooh a guilty" then if he didn't think it was a guilty?

And why not say this was obviously a reaction test, and that's why I'm voting Mulch?

Mulch · Post Post #3369 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:28 pm

Uzi that was not sarcastic imo. But even if it wasn't you've now given him an out anyway

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3370 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:28 pm

Like Mulch I scum read Narna too but this here is weak man. That vote there can come from town.

Mulch · Post Post #3371 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:28 pm

How can they be so sure I was reaction testing that they would vote me without me even annoucning that I was reaction testing?

Mulch · Post Post #3372 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:29 pm

Uzi this is the fucking point of a reaction test

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #3373 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:29 pm

In post 3369, Mulch wrote:Uzi that was not sarcastic imo. But even if it wasn't you've now given him an out anyway

It's nothing something that he couldn't have easily thought of on the spot

Mulch · Post Post #3374 (ISO) » Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:29 pm

What was the entire point if we aren't going to analyze reactions