You did it here;In post 723, rb wrote:hey thor, let's play a game:
you find where i ever said this was a meta read
misrepping scumfuck
And I asked you why you think town Thor wouldn't do it.In post 654, rb wrote:Thor didn't have to respond with 3 pages of AtE defence and i don't think town Thor does so.
You also did it earlier and I asked you what townThor would supposedly do.
You also cited me as not "being as involved" as townThor would be a few days ago.
All of that is meta as far as I'm aware. If you don't consider it meta, then switch me saying meta to whatever word you use to describe the above, because you did do these things and that's what I'm referencing when I say meta.
I also asked you to (non-meta, but relevant) explain what reads/people/actions I'm ignoring in favor of defending myself - because I've actually commented on basically everything and everyone in the game, which then discredits the rest of your case on me that isn't your magical feels for how I play.
You, then, continue to duck defending your case and keep repeating it while claiming I'm misrepping you or overly defending myself.
If over defense is going 'hey, how do you have this meta' then, sure, I'm over defending - but I don't consider that over defense, I consider that asking you to back up your stance.