In post 1464, havingfitz wrote:I'm assuming if we do not get scum today we are in lylo tomorrow.
I think our masons should claim. That reduces the scum pool by two people. I like 3 out of 6 odds better than 3 out of 8.
If the masons don't claim today...and we mislynch...then scum could get lucky and hit a mason tonight and tomorrow the lone remaining mason would have no legs to stand on against a counter claim. I.e. I'm less inclined to believe a claim in LYLO.
Might help us with VCA as well. Speaking of VCA...these 3 players have been on both mislynches: Gameburger, jjh and MathBlade. I'd wager at least one of them is scum and I suspect them in that order.
I was going to open up with a vote on Sesq but since our room for error is next to nothing I think I'll do some ISO's on a few people before I vote.
Yeah...You're doing VCA wrong btw.
You're starting with a given premise:
A scum player has to be on both mislynch wagons.
Rather than looking at the facts and seeing who was off and why.
See Mastina's guide to VCA.
I was at work til super late last night or I would have done one but Fitz' post reeks.
Even IF we end up in Fitz world after a mislynch then we narrow down the lynch pool to one town and one scum.
Then at that point mason and scum cross vote and discussion happens and we look at voting records. Masons don't vote their partners after a certain point.
ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade
