(Note: not all posts are listed here, just most of them.)
Post 41: naked wagoning in RVS - lazy play, but null on its own.
Post 47: next post after 41, goes from supporting the Percy/Eddie wagon to calling it stupid and voting the wagon leader in Robb - fails to address his own role on the wagon, even though the reason for Robb voting Percy is the same as when he joined it.
Post 79: without addressing any of the page-and-a-half of discussion since his last post, he questions monkey's vote and tries to redirect it. Posts
81 and
87 continue this line of thought.
Post 105: asks Kaboose why express suspicion if he isn't going to vote him - similar to monkey's case in 79, he seems concerned with cases/votes against him, regardless of other accompanying circumstances (like monkey simultaneously suspecting me, or Kaboose outlining multiple scenarios).
Post 143: immediately minimizes the vote on Ginggie after it is challenged (voted to get her to talk). Claims there are no cases out there for anyone being scum.
Post 145: asks Robb for directions, reads him as town - sounds like appeasement to me.
Post 150 brings up my WIFOM argument as weak in relation to Percy, to which Percy clarifies that the argument was against monkey -
153 then changes to agreement with the argument. For reference, that WIFOM argument was in reference to the "how much do you trust that read?" comment of monkey, dating all the way back to page 3, which I now consider a NAI comment. I wasn't pushing the WIFOM thing, nor was anyone else, Tchill was the one who kept bringing it back up.
Next 4 posts -
174,
186,
193, and
195 are all defensive one-liners.
Post 197 scumreads Ari for fluffposting (weak), and again brings up the WIFOM thing (and again namedrops me, a repeating occurrence which is starting to set off some buddying alarms for me).
Post 200 Townreads Ginggie for the townAF RVS read on monkey (the one which got the WIFOMy response) - remember that Tchill's vote at this point is still on Ginggie. Vote change to Ari comes in
202.
Post 247 again
tries to revive the WIFOM argument against monkey, this time with a direct appeal to me, and a follow-up question of why he (Tchill) is scummier. Like, this is the biggest red flag of all for me.
Post 260 finally votes monkey, no explanation, no case. In context, timing seems completely off as well.
Post 269 implies that he is under attack because he is trying to get conversation started. A complete misrepresentation that depicts him as an innocent party and anyone voting him as maliciously trying to shut conversation down. Another big red flag.
Post 272 advocates investigating low content posters on his wagon. Misdirection.
Post 274 unvotes (guess the monkey pressure didn't last even a day), apparently because massive asked him to make his own cases? I don't know. No explanation provided.
Post 281 votes Ginggie without elaboration - again, after a townread that has not been explicitly retracted.
283 provides some explanation (Ginggie is keeping up, but only comments on Tchill and Eddie).
Post 307 disavows Robb wagon, claims it will be a mislynch.
