Lexaeus [1] - Larxene
Xigbar [1] - Luxord
Luxord [1] - Roxas
Roxas [2] - Xigbar, Zexion
Not Voting: Xemnas, Xaldin, Saïx, Axel, Demyx, Marluxia, Lexaeus
7 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2017-08-31 18:46:21).[/color]
I'm not really interested in the claim, it's null as far as I'm concerned. If he's scum then scum presumably have some way to manipulate investigative actions which would be supported by there already being an invest-immune claim on the board. My scumreads on the two slots are more or less equal, there's already a vote on Roxas so my vote there is more useful.In post 48, III Xaldin wrote:You seem to be talking more about Laxeus yet voting Roxas, Pray tell me young one, why do you supposed a traitor would ask to be investigated ? What is the scum motivation you are seeing ?
Same question goes to you as well xigbar.
I find it pretty sketchy that your read on me is based on my read on another slot. I think his entrance lacked thought. None of the reads he's expressed in 32 mean or do anything. Maybe there's a whole lot of precognition going on there and Roxas is making a play to see how the board responds to his reads but all I have right now is a pretty baseless post calling someone "obviously town" and someone else "just scum" (quote marks for precision not for mockery) on page 2 which are ridiculous positions to hold this early. There are no interactions with other slots. It's a flat entry and I nullread the claim, if he plays like scum then I will push for his lynch, if he plays like town then I won't, I'm not going to avoid pushing him out of fear.In post 54, X Luxord wrote:As for 13 Roxas, the less conviction you actually have in your scumread, the more favorably I see you. I don't actually think there's any real urgency in sorting him nor is there any real reason to scumread him. With the claim, I'm unwilling to consider 13 as a D1 lynch.
Roles might have flavor justification but that doesn't mean that it will be good flavor justification and it doesn't mean that there will be a correlation between how town someone looks and how powerful their role is.In post 53, V Lexaeus wrote:As for Roxas... He's a special case. In flavor, he's the key (literally) to the Organization's entire scheme until the Oblivion Squad screws it up vying for power, and he runs away.
In ancient days years past, my role would actually have ties to a godfather. However, under modern definitions my role is unambiguously not a godfather. It's much closer to an innocent child, but not to the point where claiming it alone would make me conftown. I should however clarify there are two halves to my role. One gives me town credit. The other gives me incentive to be conftown by investigation.In post 49, III Xaldin wrote:Unless you supposed traitors have some sort of godfather which would be most unifitting for Roxas in all honesty.
Off of role alone I would likely be townread but I have been mislynched while carrying a role similar to what I have so I want to leave no room for doubt this time around.In post 40, V Lexaeus wrote:I say we probably shouldn't lynch him today.
Oh? Do tell how Larxene isn't obvtown then. That, or define what the term obvtown means. For me, it means obviously town. As in, a read which is so obvious it needs no explanation. Do you feel a Larxene townread needs explanation? I do not. Because Larxene is obvtown.In post 37, II Xigbar wrote:Both posts felt played up. Larxene is definitely not obvtown, Luxord is definitely not obvscum.
For comments like thisIn post 33, X Luxord wrote:Why's that?
Rather than anything useful. 12 was a poor RVS. 18 was a random switch, with unattached fluff. 22 shows lack of critical thought. 35 is a poor defense of a stance: it being the RVS is no justification for there being no reasoning.In post 33, X Luxord wrote:Also, is it just me or is the whole secret alt thing making a disproportionate amount of people use good grammar?
I must admit a lack of flavor knowledge aside from generally being aware of Roxas being Sora's opposite and I believe him going from Zero to Hero. I did get the impression my role was one of the stronger ones in the game, however, it requires specific circumstances in order to work.In post 53, V Lexaeus wrote:As for Roxas... He's a special case. In flavor, he's the key (literally) to the Organization's entire scheme until the Oblivion Squad screws it up vying for power, and he runs away.
Alignments do not necessarily match flavor (except for Xemnas I suppose), but it does seem like the role assignments are based on it. So when Roxas claims a super powerful role that benefits immensely from being cop cleared? I believe him, and don't want to waste the effort pushing him with a cop result incoming, and especially don't want to risk a mislynch without getting that sorted.
How so? Larxene is in fact obviously town. Luxord is just scum. Those were the most apt descriptions to use. The terms were accurate. And, counter-question.In post 57, VI Zexion wrote:all I have right now is a pretty baseless post calling someone "obviously town" and someone else "just scum" (quote marks for precision not for mockery) on page 2 which are ridiculous positions to hold this early.
Why didn't you interact with my slot? You didn't bother to ask me why I held those stances. I am perfectly capable of explaining them (and in the case of Luxord I am actively doing so), yet you went in and did the very thing you were accusing me of.In post 57, VI Zexion wrote:There are no interactions with other slots.
This is a continued instance of not actually providing game content.In post 51, X Luxord wrote:VOTE: 6 Zex
As someone who has no flavor knowledge, all of the names are frustratingly similar.
I don't know what this is in regards to.In post 67, XI Marluxia wrote:Luxord, if you didn't have anything that you wanted to say yet, why didn't you just say you didn't have anything to say?
Dude Im begging you, please stop doing this. Just use the name, its going to make it easier on everyone involved.In post 64, X Luxord wrote:You're right, my ISO has been basically all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
I can copy all of my thoughts on everyone here, but my heart really isn't into anything regarding scumhunting yet. Like, I won't be proactive now but I think it can be assumed that I will be eventually? I really don't think there are any motivations to be found by my lack of productivity.
Here's a direct (reformatted from Excel) copy of my notes, with one omission. (Only noting this so if I want to bring it up later, people know.)
2 Xigbar:Reaction to a relatively calm voteswitch by me in RVS. Weird "if you were scum" Q toin P26. Other than this, gut strongly says town mindset-- but based on not much concrete.12
4 Vexen:Flavor entrance, very standard, empty ISO, voteable.
5 Lexaeus:Pushesfor inv-immune. Probably just in a frivolous/reac-test way. I tend towards townreading. (Okay, nvm. It seemed genuine.) P53 seems pretty town at first glance, feeling strongly as towniest post in the game.12
6 Zexion:Lots of content. Pushesfor noisemaking which at face value makes no real sense but is a believable push for town to make. Votes5for bad reasons. Overall P47 makes me feel just a little bit weird, entertaining possible narrative of scum with strong presence? Unsure how much conviction he actually has (the less the better, honestly). P56 is towny.13
12 Larxene:Claiming inv-immune. Not impressive but claim tends towards town.
13 Roxas:Asks to be checked, says will claim if needed. Opens with scumread me and townread.12
SecondedIn post 72, IV Vexen wrote: Dude Im begging you, please stop doing this. Just use the name, its going to make it easier on everyone involved.