243 is indeed my readslist--emphasis tho on "mine", in that I didn't consult either Ginngie or Nacho for it, so.In post 245, RadiantCowbells wrote:Is that your reads in order?
I'm reasonably sure we are not tho.
Honestly?In post 252, RadiantCowbells wrote:ytf r u townreading me
Why shouldn't they?In post 252, RadiantCowbells wrote:ytf r u townreading me
I'm trying my best >B/
Explain this please?In post 254, The Wood Cutters wrote:Honestly?In post 252, RadiantCowbells wrote:ytf r u townreading me
Because of the way both RRs treated you.
Yes preflip associatives etc. but dealwithit.
More like he felt like you both had scum approaches to my slot, which ties you both together as scum.In post 259, Radical Rat wrote:Explain this please?In post 254, The Wood Cutters wrote:Honestly?In post 252, RadiantCowbells wrote:ytf r u townreading me
Because of the way both RRs treated you.
Yes preflip associatives etc. but dealwithit.
I took a look through my counteRRparts ISO and didn't see anything looking like they were trying to attach themselves to me...
WHICH MEANSIn post 261, RadiantCowbells wrote:More like he felt like you both had scum approaches to my slot, which ties you both together as scum.In post 259, Radical Rat wrote:Explain this please?In post 254, The Wood Cutters wrote:Honestly?In post 252, RadiantCowbells wrote:ytf r u townreading me
Because of the way both RRs treated you.
Yes preflip associatives etc. but dealwithit.
I took a look through my counteRRparts ISO and didn't see anything looking like they were trying to attach themselves to me...
Idk what the woodpeckers see in this butIn post 196, Reasonably Rational wrote:Indeed. TBH, it seems quite improbable that this particular hydra doesn't end up shot sooner rather than later. I'd reserve worrying about them for lylo, or a day out if you're really concerned.In post 186, The Wood Cutters wrote:Not really seeing as how our plan is to get nightkilled.In post 174, Scott and Ramona wrote:Ruby! We can worry about Ruby later.
The unfounded townread point is somewhat reasonable I guess, but I suppose I just haven't seen the currently speaking head as scum often enough to have RC's strength of conviction. I don't recall any defense of scumbuddies coming out in Inorganic Chemistry, but that game was quite some time ago.
-Cerb
I hate how in RR's ISO they never talked about a specific read, but just theories like this quote above.In post 231, Reasonably Rational wrote:Umm, no. I already determined that it's almost certainly not role related. If it were, you wouldn't have started out the game with random townreads that would draw attention to the connection. The only question is whether some meta thing like you pointed out would be used to explain it later on, or if it would just be waved away as a gut read...or possibly a tell that they'd refuse to give us more information on.In post 227, Sappho wrote:Your method was essentially what RC was doing but in a manner that didn't come across as exactly that. You were trying to get us to state whether it was role related just as much as RC was. You just didn't want it to look that way, is what I read from your post.In post 217, Reasonably Rational wrote:To answer the question though...it's more a matter of forcing some sort of reason for the stance, in order to nail them to a limited array of explanations when, as they inevitably will, they end up explaining this townread in detail. It will also allow me to decide how much weight to give the read.
-Cerb
How about Rad Cow Disease?In post 265, RadiantCowbells wrote:It's annoying that everyone calls me RC anyway so they get away with not having to deal with this nickname stuff T_T
you need to be more specific as there are two RR'sIn post 264, Dioscuri wrote:VOTE: RR
Based on context, I'm pretty sure that's my counteRRpartIn post 268, The Wood Cutters wrote:you need to be more specific as there are two RR'sIn post 264, Dioscuri wrote:VOTE: RR
I don't. I wasn't going to actually listen to your reads, I wanted to know how much to expect out of you in terms of justification for it.In post 267, RadiantCowbells wrote:Ftr I do find DrixRus asking about my certainty in my read quite odd because my understanding was neither of them respected my reads very much, particularly not hellhound.
OUr vote's already on them so blehIn post 268, The Wood Cutters wrote:you need to be more specific as there are two RR'sIn post 264, Dioscuri wrote:VOTE: RR
What does this mean?
