Mini 1936: Yume's Cutsie U-Pick (Town Win!)

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 4:59 pm

In post 312, Sappho wrote:RUBY ROSE IS SCUM.
THIS IS YOUR 100% ACCURATE READER COMING IN TO TELL YOU THIS.
VOTE: Dioscuri
nance we can vote this now, I'm finally with you.

I mean.
I don't disagree that DIO is scum, but.

I'd prefer to focus on the logical duo.

Dioscuri · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:00 pm

Yes
It's OMGUS
because I wanted to make it look like OMGUS
so that way I can read Jae to see how he responds to being Pure OMGUS'd

Aristophanes · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:00 pm

In post 320, Dioscuri wrote:No. Kill it with a frying pan and eat it with soy sauce.

Okay!

VC 1.3

RadiantCowbells

(2): Scott and Ramona 168, Radical Rat 221

Dioscuri

(2): Sappho 312, The Wood Cutters 323

Reasonably Rational

(1): Yume 9

The Wood Cutters

(1): Randomidget 65

Scott and Ramona

(1): RadiantCowbells 277

Sappho

(1): Dioscuri 315

Not Voting

(5): Raya36, Varsoon, gerryoat, Kingmaker, Reasonably Rational

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
D1 will end when a hammer is reached or on August 26/17 at 10:30am EST in (expired on 2017-08-26 10:30:00)

Mod Notes:

Tracking all Global Restriction Infractions over 5

RadiantCowbells is at 7 strikes.

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:00 pm

In post 325, The Wood Cutters wrote:
In post 312, Sappho wrote:RUBY ROSE IS SCUM.
THIS IS YOUR 100% ACCURATE READER COMING IN TO TELL YOU THIS.
VOTE: Dioscuri
nance we can vote this now, I'm finally with you.
I mean.
I don't disagree that DIO is scum, but.

I'd prefer to focus on the logical duo.

LET ME HAVE THIS

FOR A DAY AT LEAST

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:01 pm

why would you say that then

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:01 pm

also wtf

i'm not used to either you or

sappho

being ridiculous deathtunnelers and you guys are all over the map declaring people 100% scum.

7.
7 infractions.

Wow!

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:01 pm

whoops 7 already

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:01 pm

In post 319, The Wood Cutters wrote:
In post 310, Radical Rat wrote:I never said I trusted the Gays

That would indeed make a good no-context quote in postgame.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:02 pm

Damnit RC.

Stop fucking up the post restriction.

-Cerb

Radical Rat · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:04 pm

I would prefer not to out PT interactions without consent, if that's alright with you.

And... Yeah, I mean. I could ask that to everyone in the game, but I'm more interested in the Yumester specifically. I'm not really sure what else you want me to say about it

Dioscuri · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:05 pm

Got it thanks.

And yeah, I don't get why you're so concerned with Our Star here there is just so many people to talk to and scumhunt.

Radical Rat · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:05 pm

In post 326, Dioscuri wrote:Yes
It's OMGUS
because I wanted to make it look like OMGUS
so that way I can read Jae to see how he responds to being Pure OMGUS'd

VOTE: Dioscuri

Kinda defeating the purpose by saying that.

Dioscuri · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:06 pm

RR
why do you scumread me.

Radical Rat · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 335, Dioscuri wrote:Got it thanks.

And yeah, I don't get why you're so concerned with Our Star here there is just so many people to talk to and scumhunt.

It's not like I'm not doing anything else.

I just want to make sure she isn't forgotten amidst the chaos of the day.

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:08 pm

In post 322, Reasonably Rational wrote:TWC: Maybe you should read Drixxy Drixx's next post?
-Cerb

The contents of what Dr. Doom quoted were present in the original quote.
I can't quite find the right word for that but.
Basically.

Everything that Dr. Doom responded to in 306 was present in 296. 305 was responding to 296, whereas 306 was responding to the later 304. So the question becomes--why didn't Dr. Doom respond to the contents of our roleclaim in 305? Why did he wait until 306 to do so, which was him responding to a separate post?

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:09 pm

In post 323, The Wood Cutters wrote:
In post 315, Dioscuri wrote:pedit: lolkay
VOTE: Sappho
VOTE: DIOSCURIWHATEVERBLATANT OMGUS
BLATANT
L
A
T
A
N
T

Yeah let's leave my lovers alone pls. <3

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:09 pm

In post 324, RadiantCowbells wrote:oh and I refuse to die N1 so

YAY, TIBBERS!

Oh my god I so want that to actually do something that would be amazing. <3

Radical Rat · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:09 pm

In post 337, Dioscuri wrote:RR
why do you scumread me.

Because reaction tests don't work if you say they're reaction tests before getting a reaction. So I don't believe that post.

I also find your fixation on me wanting to hear from the Yumester meaning I'm not interacting or scumhunting elsewhere very strange, seeing as I absolutely am.

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:10 pm

In post 327, Aristophanes wrote:Missed Pagetop again This one will be a VC tho!

Wait.

...Your last one won't have one?

FUCK THAT MEANS OUR VOTE FOR THE LOGICAL DUO WILL EFFECTIVELY NOT HAVE EXISTED

GINNGIE CAN I MOVE IT BACK

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:11 pm

In post 341, The Wood Cutters wrote:
In post 324, RadiantCowbells wrote:oh and I refuse to die N1 so

YAY, TIBBERS!
Oh my god I so want that to actually do something that would be amazing. <3

It actually doesn't because that's not the trigger command

Dioscuri · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:13 pm

Like Jae's read on me is outdated and they're realize this. Pet Owner can't even read me for shit
Tie Man Representing Woodchucks thinks as scum I'd Blatantly OMGUS people as scum in this context.
And then there's you, who says "Hi, I care about Yume out of all the people in the game, oh suddenly I care about Alisae, I'm not even pushing that em's scum, I'm pushing they're doing a reaction test and outing that it was a reaction test."

In post 338, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 335, Dioscuri wrote:Got it thanks.

And yeah, I don't get why you're so concerned with Our Star here there is just so many people to talk to and scumhunt.
It's not like I'm not doing anything else.

I just want to make sure she isn't forgotten amidst the chaos of the day.

lol I think you should worry about yourself and trying to read other people, because you're not attempting to sort what's going on, you're really not.

pedit: Okay what are you scumhunting and where? Right now you're pushing "I did a reaction test and outed it was a reaction test" which is completely NAI and comes off as you're not trying to sort me alignment wise. Like, out of the all the people you want to look out for it's UMay.
That is super unnatural man.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:14 pm

In post 339, The Wood Cutters wrote:
In post 322, Reasonably Rational wrote:TWC: Maybe you should read Drixxy Drixx's next post?
-Cerb
The contents of what Dr. Doom quoted were present in the original quote.
I can't quite find the right word for that but.
Basically.

Everything that Dr. Doom responded to in 306 was present in 296. 305 was responding to 296, whereas 306 was responding to the later 304. So the question becomes--why didn't Dr. Doom respond to the contents of our roleclaim in 305? Why did he wait until 306 to do so, which was him responding to a separate post?

Dunno.

He was probably just going to ignore you(because as he said, there's essentially no chance you could actually counterclaim us from what little we claimed, particularly given how unique our role is, and how it's more than what he claimed, but the relevant NU part is what he claimed), then decided to respond when you doubled down on the drivel.

He didn't tell me his reasoning though. so, that's just what I'm assuming.

-Cerb

The Wood Cutters · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:15 pm

In post 343, The Wood Cutters wrote:
In post 327, Aristophanes wrote:Missed Pagetop again This one will be a VC tho!
Wait.

...Your last one won't have one?

FUCK THAT MEANS OUR VOTE FOR THE LOGICAL DUO WILL EFFECTIVELY NOT HAVE EXISTED

GINNGIE CAN I MOVE IT BACK

NO, 24 HOURS

gerryoat · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:16 pm

Is this Earth? If so, that means you all are despicable humans.

It's I,

Yoshiko

Yohane, the fallen angel. Luckily I'm here to find the wrong doers, and not cause chaos.

Scott and Ramona · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:16 pm

We actually voted for Ruby though, Dio. Why isn't that worse than what Ratburn is doing?

- Scott