I know you said before that Spiff is a read you can't really explain, but can you explain what you saw in their exchange that gave you that impression? Because I had the opposite view from reading that.mastina wrote:It's not quite pointless; it's showing how much of an absolute scumfuck Spiffeh is with his stances and how much Ginngie bleeds town so.
It's been a while since I've played with him but I remember two games. One, he was pretty good. The other, he just shit posted. (Pretty sure he was town in both if I'm not mistaken).Imperium wrote:Seriously anyone thinking spiffeh is lynchbait needs serious reevaluations of life.
Easy to jump on and easy to lynch are two different things. It's easy to go "OMG SOFTCLAIM SCUM!", but you're right, good luck lynching on that basis.Heartless wrote:no... it really wasn't...
and the fact that no one else voted mastina for it kind of proves it wasn't
I don't. But I've only ever hydra'd with two people.VNB wrote:Nacho I might be the only person on mafiascum who doesn't have a hydra with you!
______________________
Man this thread turned into a shit post fest fast.
camn wrote:except kmd is the grown up here.
Imperium wrote:so kmd is the boring one?
Story of my lifecamn wrote:yup
____________________
I've definitely heard this a ton of times and...it depends on the person really. It's one of those things like "scum don't interact with each other" yet I played a game where I was scum and one of my buddies ONLY talked to me and our other buddy.Imperium wrote:So I have a friend at another site who has this belief in this 1 in 3 thing, in which scum when positing a group of three names always lists one of their partners. I don't necessarily believe in the 1 in 3 thing, but it will be interesting to see if any of the people who listed three people who might be scum at the beginning will be scum.
does that make sense?
Just an end game thought really.
Tbh, I'll probably seem pretty cookie cutter until I'm able to fully keep up. When just being able to read the whole thread is as much a priority as finding scum, it makes things pretty rushed and ruins any chance at real-time interaction.Caryatid wrote:I think that it was a fairly cookie cutter as you can see from all these little squares. His vote in his second post seemed like "well I disagree with you so here is a vote".
I think if there's a scum doctor flip at any point then that's going to look bad for him.
I like how the little cookie cutter shapes grew eyes at one point and started looking like people.
The colours of peoples names on this exercise were mostly indicative of "which is the sharpest crayon I noticed first" but I initially made his name green and then realised I didn't want his name to be green and so I scribbled in a few colours and did black over it and etched his name because etching is pretty. Maybe it means something that I didn't want his name to be green but this is still a null read for me. I read his posts and they just kind of wash over me. His later stuff -- after the part where you asked me this question -- seems less cookie cutter than his earlier stuff did? I think I need to be in a more languagey place than I am before I'll be ready to have a read there. For now I'm listening to what you're saying and taking it seriously but I want to get there on my own in my own way.
Nope.Imperium wrote:Are you getting camn's role claim with notice confused?
______________
I'm close. I'm through 32. But I can not focus at all. I have to call it quits for the night.
