In post 593, RadiantCowbells wrote:not having this conversation
VOTE: Eddie Cane
this is definitely scum regardless of what anything else is.
What?
I don't even know who to vote right now.
UNVOTE:
In post 593, RadiantCowbells wrote:not having this conversation
VOTE: Eddie Cane
this is definitely scum regardless of what anything else is.
What?
I thought you thought I was scum. Why would you be voting where I want you to vote?In post 600, TesXX wrote:Wait but firstIn post 593, RadiantCowbells wrote:not having this conversation
VOTE: Eddie Cane
this is definitely scum regardless of what anything else is.What?
I don't even know who to vote right now.
UNVOTE:
So Wolfy lol, epitome of low hanging fruit and shit reasonIn post 597, TesXX wrote:Wait Fykus.
You declared what you thought was intent to hammer on me when you didn't explain WHY you were scumreading me in the first place, if you even WERE.
VOTE: fykus
No, I was saying between you and Fykus (and also Mulch.) I don't know who to vote.In post 601, RadiantCowbells wrote:I thought you thought I was scum. Why would you be voting where I want you to vote?In post 600, TesXX wrote:Wait but firstIn post 593, RadiantCowbells wrote:not having this conversation
VOTE: Eddie Cane
this is definitely scum regardless of what anything else is.What?
I don't even know who to vote right now.
UNVOTE:
no, you need to fucking stop.
Im pretty obvious villa to u no matter ur allignment :/In post 612, RadiantCowbells wrote:Mulch I'll lynch you today if I have to.
Don't get your interest in Jin, Mulch.In post 613, Mulch wrote:There are some games when I feel like wolves aren't playing well. This is not one of them. I could wagon Eddie
ACTUALLYIn post 602, Mulch wrote:So Wolfy lol, epitome of low hanging fruit and shit reasonIn post 597, TesXX wrote:Wait Fykus.
You declared what you thought was intent to hammer on me when you didn't explain WHY you were scumreading me in the first place, if you even WERE.
VOTE: fykus
VOTE: tessx
For now I will VOTE: MulchIn post 622, TesXX wrote:Not going to post THAT much tonight, mostly tomorrow. ButACTUALLYIn post 602, Mulch wrote:So Wolfy lol, epitome of low hanging fruit and shit reasonIn post 597, TesXX wrote:Wait Fykus.
You declared what you thought was intent to hammer on me when you didn't explain WHY you were scumreading me in the first place, if you even WERE.
VOTE: fykus
VOTE: tessxEXPLAINWHY MY REASONING IS BAD INSTEAD OF BRUSHING IT OFF.
I'D ALSO LIKE AN ACTUAL RESPONSE TO A LOT OF THE RECENT POINTS I MADE ON YOU.
Again, sorry I'm overreacting about all this but it makes me annoyed.