In post 294, II Xigbar wrote:Somehow prod dodged at ninety hours. Content later.
I just neglected to do that. :S
In post 294, II Xigbar wrote:Somehow prod dodged at ninety hours. Content later.
OK - and that's your best scumtell on him?In post 297, XIII Roxas wrote:Wherein Xaldin continues to do nothing.
In post 303, VII Saix wrote:Who is opposed to Axel lynch and why?
In post 144, VII Saix wrote:If you really think I am scum, the motivation needs to be to take me to L, and you aren't gonna achieve that with this post and such a vote.
11 days to deadline.In post 303, VII Saix wrote:This decision can't happen closer to the deadline.
Flavorwise, this is scum.In post 287, XI Marluxia wrote:The Graceful Assassin has arrived, so you may bow to the true master of Castle Oblivion. If you have anything that you'd like for me to read or address while I'm catching up, please do so as soon as possible. If your questions are asking me general opinions of players, please avoid wasting the time of us both and hold that questions until after the show.
I'm very fun. I can sing and dance and flirt with the mod. Now on to other, less important things...In post 290, XII Larxene wrote:Spoiler: we killed him. Sorry not sorry? We'll have a lot of fun with New Better Vexen, promise! <3In post 285, I Xemnas wrote:My friends, I'm happy to announce that Vexen is about to return from his prolonged excursion in Castle Oblivion. You may notice that his personality has undergone some... adjustments during his visit. Please try not to call attention to these changes; we do not want to upset our friend, do we?
Goddammit. Are you telling me I could have been Luxord if I'd just waited a day? I thought you guys loved me. Next Xion's gonna get added just to rub salt in the cavity where you ripped my heart out.
Um... Okay, I see the like 14 prod dodges/replaces in the last couple pages, but do you have a reason for your fear mongering here? It's really yucky. Explain to me why we should lynch Axel, either by linking a case or by making one. Then I shall continue to do whatever the hell I feel like because you're not my robot supervisor. Especially when you appear to have managed to convince approximately no one.In post 303, VII Saix wrote:Who is opposed to Axel lynch and why?
This decision can't happen closer to the deadline. Scurrying for a legit lynch at the last moment will results in a mislynch.
Short answer: yes. I very strongly feel based on your opener to the game that you are scum trying to pocket me.In post 204, VI Zexion wrote:@Xigbar is 195/196 addressed to me? Don't understand what you mean by picking someone who you're scumreading to declare obvtown there.
If you are highlighting the time frame of 11 days here, I think it's just the way of looking at it from two different positions. I see this as a week gone rather than 11 days remaining.In post 304, VIII Axel wrote:In post 303, VII Saix wrote:Who is opposed to Axel lynch and why?In post 144, VII Saix wrote:If you really think I am scum, the motivation needs to be to take me to L, and you aren't gonna achieve that with this post and such a vote.11 days to deadline.In post 303, VII Saix wrote:This decision can't happen closer to the deadline.
Tell me right now what town player actually worries about getting acertainlynch - rather thanAlynch - 11 days before the deadline.
Efforts in terms of posts could be NAI, but efforts in terms of scumhunting is very much AI.In post 311, IV Vexen wrote:
VOTE: Saix
I really feel like quoting goodmorning here, but Effort is NAI.
You are contradicting yourself here. How is your vote on me any different from my vote on Axel? All that you have summarised is wrong with my tunnel on Axel is also wrong with your tunnel and vote on me.In post 311, IV Vexen wrote: The fact is that you're saying you're tunneled on Axel because fluffposting and lack of effort while I see nothing to suggest you're actually looking for motivations. This is at best lazy posting, and at worst posting actively looking to slip under the radar. You haven't said ANYTHING about anyone not named Axel since page five, and the amount of certainty compared to the 'evidence' on Axel is frankly garbo.
Convince me Axel's scum, cause your 144 just seems like a big ball of nulltells on Axel and hypocrisy from you, and I'm not seeing a more cohesive case from you.
What case on you? If saying your push on Axel is hot garbo amounts to a case now, than ms has reeeeally gone downhill.In post 317, VII Saix wrote:What's worrying is that you are not able to see how whatever you have wrote as a case on me
- is also wrong with Axel (in your words - "fluffposting, lack of effort, lazy posting, posting actively, certainty compared to evidence", etc.), and,
- is also wrong with you (if my vote on Axel is bad, so is your vote on me, coz there's nothing in that post and vote that you are seeking from me. In your words, "hypocrisy and lack of a cohesive case on someone".