1-3 thoughts:
#11 Gonna stand by my read about PS here. Voting for game-related reasons that early in RVS feels like a cautious scum. But of course it's a weak read. PS's reaction in #13, #15, #42 does not reflect what she claims in #21, #57, and #58. She's lying. I don't think lying often comes from town. #72 PS gets towncredit for townreading me at a point where scumreading me—I think—was a better scum play.
Robb vs PS looks like TownRobb vs ScumPS or TownRobb vs TownPS. So it isn't likely that there's a partnership between them.
#30 Robb not having anything to add when he's the one who instigated the questioning establishes that he's more inclined to be reactionary rather than trying to figure out the game at this point. But that's NAI at this point.
#46 Was Massive's vote explained here.
Massive?
How is condescending a grounds for voting?
#47 Chill's voting Robb is bad play from both scum and town. NAI.
#64, #66, #67 I think Korts' push against me was really weak in retrospect but it sounds "good" because he was being assertive about it. I don't see how he could have seen me highly scummy there to warrant such aggressiveness. It follows the trend from #25 where Korts misrepresents Robb's idea of RVS as "very narrow". Robb's idea of RVS is the standard paradigm. Korts likes to misrepresent minor thoughts unforgivably. Establishes Korts as a shitstirrer himself. Korts thinks "shit-stirring" is scummy in #69 but that's exactly what he does. #71 is also a bad reason to scumread someone. "WIFOM" (what he assumes is) is NAI. Feels like bad town or scum.
#73 Out of all the weak arguments Korts pushed against me, Assemblerotws chose the weakest to vote me. This could be ScumKorts + ScumAssemble.
Reads so far:
Town:
Leantown:
Nulltown: Robb
Null: Massive, TChill
Nullscum: PS
Leanscum: Korts, Assemble
Scum: