Mini 1935: Green Haired UPick (Game Over)

[esires]

I think the "claimed dayvig" thing is more a result of misinterpreting a joke claim, which I also did at first. But looking back he never claimed dayvig, and faking a dayvig shot leads exactly nowhere. It disproves itself immediately. So I have to assume that was a joke / ploy.

[Tarkus]

Spoiler:

I bashed rando

The day shot wasn't serious lol obviously that would be exposed shortly after

I don't think TIAM is scum anymore though so VOTE: WhyMafia

1SVT looks scummy to me as well

pedit: ya what esires said

[TwoInAMillion]

He doesn't seem like the brightest crayon in the box. I think it's more likely he made a mistake than a gambit. But having two millers is like having 5 scum in a 13 player game. It just doesn't happen. The simplest explanation is that it's a mistake that backfired, rather than something astronomical in the game setup.

[Chickadee]

Well, Why, this doesn't look good for you. I'm not going to pile on a vote right this minute though, because we still have some lurkers from yesterday, and I'd like for everyone to be able to chime in, not just slide by another day.

[Tarkus]

o TIAM you blindingly brilliant crayon lmao

It's just a crazy setup, you'll see

[Chickadee]

To be fair (I know its not the same) I've been lynched because of an unbelievable counterclaim where I was a JOAT, and another player was a JOAT. We were both town. So I lean toward believing it's just a crazy setup. I want to let it play out.

[Lucky2u]

To be fair (I know its not the same) I've been lynched because of an unbelievable counterclaim where I was a JOAT, and another player was a JOAT. We were both town. So I lean toward believing it's just a crazy setup. I want to let it play out.

tbh that is my greatest worry about pursuing this miller vs miller thing. there are too many ways this blows up in our face.

[WhyMafia]

Like I have no idea what to say. Clearly I was wrong this whole game. My actions speak for themselves. If you think I played like a partner then I can't change your opinion. However, I stand by everything I said earlier. I can't change your minds over that. Instead, we can persue someone who actually behaved scummily

[TwoInAMillion]

A mod's goal is to have a balanced game, not create crazy setup WIFOM. That said, if no one counterclaims in 24 hours I'll unvote.

[Lucky2u]

A mod's goal is to have a balanced game, not create crazy setup WIFOM. That said, if no one counterclaims in 24 hours I'll unvote.

but there are possibilities that it's not the mod at all. for example an SK who is just lying. Maybe a lyncher who is making a gambit, counter claim his target then claim to be a vig to boot and hope there is a second kill he can take credit for.

I know I said I'd try to help sort out the millers today but I was kind of hoping it would just sort itself out.... or a Doc would have atleast had the common sense to save RC to shepard us further...

[Chickadee]

save RC to shepard us further...

That doesn't sit well with me

[Lucky2u]

...because?

[Chickadee]

Because it tells me you don't want to think for yourself. Not a good town quality.

[WhyMafia]

Because it tells me you don't want to think for yourself. Not a good town quality.

Not a good town quality, but something Town could still say

[WhyMafia]

Null: Beeboy, Nazeebo, 1 Shot Vanilla Town, Lucky2u

I feel like there's at least 1 scum in here, leaning towards Naz and 1SVT

[Lucky2u]

Null: Beeboy, Nazeebo, 1 Shot Vanilla Town, Lucky2u

I feel like there's at least 1 scum in here, leaning towards Naz and 1SVT

I disagree on Naz. Reading through his iso, he looks good. He asked the right things and while he was weak on the cookie wagon, scum Naz had a good opportunity to push doubt on that wagon or just not vote it. We were in danger of a no lynch, so him voting it at the end means he rather take a small amount of town cred then a no lynch and that doesn't make sense. I'm not saying he is definitely town, but he is not today's lynch by a long shot.

[Lucky2u]

Because it tells me you don't want to think for yourself. Not a good town quality.

That's a legitimate concern. *shrug*

[WhyMafia]

Null: Beeboy, Nazeebo, 1 Shot Vanilla Town, Lucky2u

I feel like there's at least 1 scum in here, leaning towards Naz and 1SVT

I disagree on Naz. Reading through his iso, he looks good. He asked the right things and while he was weak on the cookie wagon, scum Naz had a good opportunity to push doubt on that wagon or just not vote it. We were in danger of a no lynch, so him voting it at the end means he rather take a small amount of town cred then a no lynch and that doesn't make sense. I'm not saying he is definitely town, but he is not today's lynch by a long shot.

That's fair. My primary reason for my scum read was bc of the cookie wagon, but what you say makes sense. What do you feel on 1SVT?

[Nazeebo]

It must be Two in a Million, right? The vig claim is legit and Two is still going for Tarkus?

vote: TwoInAMillion

I don't get this. how is this a legit claim? Why can't he be 3P?

[Nazeebo]

Null: Beeboy, Nazeebo, 1 Shot Vanilla Town, Lucky2u

I feel like there's at least 1 scum in here, leaning towards Naz and 1SVT

haha good one. try again

[Nazeebo]

VOTE: esires

Pretty sure this is scum.

His day opening was terrible. And Cookie's behavior around him was really weird. Cookie scumread esires early in the game, when I asked him to walk me through that read, I never got an answer. He later moved esires to null for ??? reasons but never really interacted with him.

Seems like a really crappy bus attempt by Cookie tbh. I'd love to see this get rope.

[iDanyboy]

ok, yet again I am caught back up and cookie claimed scum so what more do I have to do today?

Where did Cookie claim scum? This comes out of nowhere, from you sheeping RC to Cookie scum claimed.

I look like a scumfuck don't i

Like I have no idea what to say. Clearly I was wrong this whole game. My actions speak for themselves. If you think I played like a partner then I can't change your opinion. However, I stand by everything I said earlier. I can't change your minds over that.

Instead, we can persue someone who actually behaved scummily

Nice contradiction.

VOTE: esires

Pretty sure this is scum.

His day opening was terrible. And Cookie's behavior around him was really weird. Cookie scumread esires early in the game, when I asked him to walk me through that read, I never got an answer. He later moved esires to null for ??? reasons but never really interacted with him.

Right now I'm more confident in voting esires because I don't entirely understand the WhyMafia case. Is it all based on the WhyMafia saying RC is trying to call for a mislynch or is there more to it?
Seems like a really crappy bus attempt by Cookie tbh. I'd love to see this get rope.

Agree with this a lot. Plus his case on Chick in Post 679 doesn't make a lot of sense, She hasn't done most of those things because she's just plain inactive. Then he forgets about it with his entrance into day 2 and goes for TIAM.

A mod's goal is to have a balanced game, not create crazy setup WIFOM. That said, if no one counterclaims in 24 hours I'll unvote.

No one CC him yesterday so I doubt anyone is going to CC him today. I'm putting you into my town pile now because of RC's read on you and I sense that he is better than me.

VOTE: esires

[WhyMafia]

It's not a contradiction. Associations make me look like a scumfuck. Not actions

[WhyMafia]

I do like naz's recent posts though

[WhyMafia]

I'll sheep
VOTE: esires