Micro 738: Fountain of Tired Souls [Endgame]

[Alisae]

VOTE COUNT 1 . 10 Garrybote ----- 3 ( Impoetic, JaeReed, Purple Nurple ) L- 2 Impoetic ------ 3 ( Lil Uzi Vert, Aristophanes, Garrybote ) L- 2 osuka --------- 1 ( osuka ) L- 4 Purple Nurple - 1 ( Nahdia ) L- 4 Nahdia -------- 1 ( Oggs Benedict ) L- 4 Not Voting --- 0 ( No One ) With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Lynch # # # # # # # # # # # ######### | [ 0 5 5 % ] [/center][/b][/i]

FOS COUNT 1 . 10 JaeReed ------- 3 ( Aristophanes, Impoetic, osuka ) Nahdia -------- 2 ( Aristophanes, Purple Nurple ) Impoetic ------ 2 ( Aristophanes, JaeReed ) Lil Uzi Vert -- 2 ( Aristophanes, Oggs Benedict ) Purple Nurple - 1 ( osuka ) Aristophanes -- 1 ( Purple Nurple ) Oggs Benedict - 1 ( Aristophanes ) osuka --------- 1 ( Aristophanes ) Garrybote ----- 1 ( Purple Nurple ) Not FoS'ing --- 3 ( Garrybote, Lil Uzi Vert, Nahdia) Days Remaining Without Lynching 3

[Nahdia]

sorry wow where does the time go

[Nahdia]

i reread impoetic and ive decided i dont wanna vote her. nor do i really wanna vote gerry.

VOTE: Aristophanes

[Nahdia]

i get that ari clearly has a PR but they've still been pretty much empty. would like an explanation for their impo vote.

[gerryoat]

i dont get the tr on impoetic?? i clearly just showed the obvious differences??

[Nahdia]

from 16 months ago.

[gerryoat]

idk she still acts the same, at least in EM games. which is why i said earlier unless she's changed. do u have proof she has?

[Alisae]

A

r

i

s

t

o

p

h

a

n

e

s

,

L

i

l

U

z

i

V

e

r

t

,

P

u

r

p

l

e

N

u

r

p

l

e

a

n

d

J

a

e

R

e

e

d

h

a

v

e

a

l

l

b

e

e

n

p

r

o

d

d

e

d

.

P

l

e

a

s

e

a

n

n

o

u

n

c

e

V

/

L

A

f

o

r

m

o

r

e

t

h

a

n

4

8

h

o

u

r

s

i

n

a

c

t

i

v

i

t

y

!

A

n

d

p

u

t

u

p

f

l

a

g

s

.

T

h

o

s

e

a

r

e

v

e

r

y

h

e

l

p

f

u

l

f

o

r

A

l

i

s

a

e

s

!

T

h

a

n

k

y

o

u

v

e

r

y

m

u

c

h

!

:

]

L

o

v

e

,

A

l

i

s

a

e

<

3

[JaeReed]

Me: what the fuck I've been-- oh I guess I haven't posted recently huh

[gerryoat]

If you could talk about that and give me a case on impoetic that's in one post I'll listen.

did u listen or nah

[Impoetic]

The Game is Nightless. If there are 3 nights where a No Lynch is achieved, the bar will close and everyone will lose.

also this tips me to it being multiball. just the wording

You know you can fake towntell all you'd like but you're not going to fool anyone with it.

Btw I wanted to hold onto this some more until more people would engage it but since nobody is and I can't think of anything else to post right now I might as well elaborate.

This post seems fine on the surface, right? It's a reasonable point to make. Except...

>

There is 2 groupscum and 7 townies.

The game is mod-confirmed to be singleball, 2:7 at that. Therein enters the argument, "oh, but it must be a townslip then!". Seems fine, right? It seems like gerry responding to that particular game rule quirk and saying multiball when it's mod-confirmed singleball would be a townslip, right?

You'd think so, but let's go check out the post in question because therein enters a problem.

>

The Game is Nightless. If there are 3 nights where a No Lynch is achieved, the bar will close and everyone will lose. (hey that ryhmes)

>

For flavour purposes, Days will be refered to as Nights.

>

Alignment was rolled before flavour and roles, as such Flavour is NAI.

>

Scum may use factional and individual actions simultaneously.

>

Daytalk is enabled for all.

>

There is 2 groupscum and 7 townies.

...Don't see it?

...Okay, so let me make it more obvious then.

>

The Game is Nightless. If there are 3 nights where a No Lynch is achieved, the bar will close and everyone will lose. (hey that ryhmes)

>

For flavour purposes, Days will be refered to as Nights.

>

Alignment was rolled before flavour and roles, as such Flavour is NAI.

>

Scum may use factional and individual actions simultaneously.

>

Daytalk is enabled for all.

>

There is 2 groupscum and 7 townies.

Look at how close these two are together. (Don't believe me? Go to the post in question and check it out for yourself!) gerry suggested multiball by quoting the first, when the second is literally right below it. It's fake. gerry is scum, who was trying to fake a towntell. But there's no way he could have actually made that mistake.

But it wouldn't be a townslip, because him saying that as either alignment when it's mod-confirmed otherwise would mean he didn't know it was

confirmed

singleball, and

not

that he didn't know it was singleball; since the mistake is possible to make as scum, why pretend to make it?

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Me: what the fuck I've been-- oh I guess I haven't posted recently huh

This

[Lil Uzi Vert]

The Game is Nightless. If there are 3 nights where a No Lynch is achieved, the bar will close and everyone will lose.

also this tips me to it being multiball. just the wording

You know you can fake towntell all you'd like but you're not going to fool anyone with it.

Btw I wanted to hold onto this some more until more people would engage it but since nobody is and I can't think of anything else to post right now I might as well elaborate.

This post seems fine on the surface, right? It's a reasonable point to make. Except...

>

There is 2 groupscum and 7 townies.

The game is mod-confirmed to be singleball, 2:7 at that. Therein enters the argument, "oh, but it must be a townslip then!". Seems fine, right? It seems like gerry responding to that particular game rule quirk and saying multiball when it's mod-confirmed singleball would be a townslip, right?

You'd think so, but let's go check out the post in question because therein enters a problem.

>

The Game is Nightless. If there are 3 nights where a No Lynch is achieved, the bar will close and everyone will lose. (hey that ryhmes)

>

For flavour purposes, Days will be refered to as Nights.

>

Alignment was rolled before flavour and roles, as such Flavour is NAI.

>

Scum may use factional and individual actions simultaneously.

>

Daytalk is enabled for all.

>

There is 2 groupscum and 7 townies.

...Don't see it?

...Okay, so let me make it more obvious then.

>

The Game is Nightless. If there are 3 nights where a No Lynch is achieved, the bar will close and everyone will lose. (hey that ryhmes)

>

For flavour purposes, Days will be refered to as Nights.

>

Alignment was rolled before flavour and roles, as such Flavour is NAI.

>

Scum may use factional and individual actions simultaneously.

>

Daytalk is enabled for all.

>

There is 2 groupscum and 7 townies.

Look at how close these two are together. (Don't believe me? Go to the post in question and check it out for yourself!) gerry suggested multiball by quoting the first, when the second is literally right below it. It's fake. gerry is scum, who was trying to fake a towntell. But there's no way he could have actually made that mistake.

But it wouldn't be a townslip, because him saying that as either alignment when it's mod-confirmed otherwise would mean he didn't know it was

confirmed

singleball, and

not

that he didn't know it was singleball; since the mistake is possible to make as scum, why pretend to make it?

Better question.

Why pretend to make it with the experience level in the room?

[gerryoat]

cuz i pretended to try and townslip duh!!!! xDDDDDD

[Impoetic]

One FEELING, even. One reason for you to say you've never seen me do it "as town" when the truth is you've never seen me do it

at all.

(By the way, that's a reason for me not to unvote you, right there.)

Lies, because as scum here you did the same thing you are doing now.

viewtopic.php?t=71047&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go

no jokes, you wen straight to "serious" votes.

compared to say here on EM where you were more joking around at first as town.

https://epicmafia.com/topic/76498?usern ... pmI&page=1

>literally had to go all the way back to EM games to find the towngame case

>we just played a mini normal where I was town

I think I mentioned it already, and I think i was serious that last game -- and

more

engaged early on than I am this game.

As for the scumgame, the first 3 posts I see in the linked iso are joke one-liners. Not casting an RVS vote isn't the same as not having filler posts. What even is the argument you're trying to make? I can play however I want, just like anyone else, and sometimes my mood will fluctuate in games. Is this really something you actually feel valid, or is it all just sophistry?

[gerryoat]

if i went through the effort to try and find EM games, which is what i relate to you with, then obviously i believe it. i remember a game you were town but you like barely posted, and i remember the game we were both maf together and then left.

[Impoetic]

when the truth is you've never seen me do it at all.

wanna take this back now or nah

Okay, what is it you

claim

to think you've seen me do more as scum than as town, exactly?

Because what you seem to be claiming is that it's the, uhh, diving right into reads and not doing RVS, which uhh... to disprove that, I could go quote the

literal first post

in the scumgame you linked and the

last game we played together,

RIGHT before this one, where I was town and entered in a serious mindset.

[Purple Nurple]

Me: what the fuck I've been-- oh I guess I haven't posted recently huh

[Impoetic]

idk she still acts the same, at least in EM games. which is why i said earlier unless she's changed. do u have proof she has?

do you have proof I haven't?

or better yet, do you have proof I would have played this way as scum earlier?

This is the last game we played together, which ended just before we both signed up for the current one. Am I more disorganized at the beginning of that game? Maybe, I guess, on looking back, but I'm also way more involved, and way more serious about my votes, iirc. That in and of itself is a reason to be scattered, because I was more intent on trying to play. Not to mention a lot more had happened by the first time I posted.

Whatever you're trying to say, it's not true, and vague meta off 1-2 games that you had to handpick should not be very convincing to anyone else, either.

[Impoetic]

The burden of proof is on you, buckaroo.

Hey, it rhymes!

[JaeReed]

Impo do you think I should be townreading you off your stubborn ass aggression towards gerry?

[Impoetic]

probably

[Impoetic]

then again, my role PM says I'm mafia, so maybe not?

[gerryoat]

i'm annoyed jae just ignores me in games now

[gerryoat]

idk she still acts the same, at least in EM games. which is why i said earlier unless she's changed. do u have proof she has?

do you have proof I haven't?

or better yet, do you have proof I would have played this way as scum earlier?

This is the last game we played together, which ended just before we both signed up for the current one. Am I more disorganized at the beginning of that game? Maybe, I guess, on looking back, but I'm also way more involved, and way more serious about my votes, iirc. That in and of itself is a reason to be scattered, because I was more intent on trying to play. Not to mention a lot more had happened by the first time I posted.

Whatever you're trying to say, it's not true, and vague meta off 1-2 games that you had to handpick should not be very convincing to anyone else, either.

i still think its true. maybe you might have changed, but the meta is what i remembered it to be. literally any EM game. but maybe you just act different on here. or maybe i'm just annoyed cause one of the ppl whose played with me on forum maf the most scumreads me for bad reasons in my mind, so its making me think you have to be scum. idk w/e