Mini 1942 - Switchboard 2 [Game Over]

Flubbernugget · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:05 pm

Aubrey getting caught making a stupid play and then going "i need to post less cuz site meta" is scummy as hell

Massive town points for radical rat here

Flubbernugget · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:15 pm

In post 227, Realeo wrote:But are not you supposed to be glad at that point that the risky plan dies as a risk averse?

Like, for a lady who claim that setup speccing is bad, any attempt to end setup speccing should be good and responded by "Thank God Realeo that you ended this idiot talk." instead of scolding me.

FUCKIN SLAY

Why no vote for chickadee after seeing this?

Flubbernugget · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:18 pm

Pg 11

Realeo · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:24 pm

In post 501, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 227, Realeo wrote:But are not you supposed to be glad at that point that the risky plan dies as a risk averse?

Like, for a lady who claim that setup speccing is bad, any attempt to end setup speccing should be good and responded by "Thank God Realeo that you ended this idiot talk." instead of scolding me.
FUCKIN SLAY

Why no vote for chickadee after seeing this?

I concluded that Chickadee is an explosive player so it's not exactly an AI thing. It should be self-evident about Chickadee is an explosive player.

Aubrey · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:37 pm

In post 500, Flubbernugget wrote:Aubrey getting caught making a stupid play and then going "i need to post less cuz site meta" is scummy as hell

Lol, K. Yet I'm still one of the top posters, and still opinionated as hell. Clearly I've followed through with that statement.

Raya36 · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:53 pm

Page 11

In post 254, Aubrey wrote:
In post 40, Radical Rat wrote: If anything, I'd expect more PRs in the low priority for balance purposes, but that's purely speculation.
This line doesn't come from scum. At least it is highly unlikely.

can you elaborate?

In post 263, Nosferatu wrote:you're scum
VOTE: moz

Don't like this and I don't like his iso analysis after. The vote seems almost omgus, coming directly after conflict with Moz, then the iso speculation looks like they are trying to justify the vote and nitpick rather than actually get a read.

Aubrey · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:33 pm

In post 505, Raya36 wrote:
In post 254, Aubrey wrote:
In post 40, Radical Rat wrote: If anything, I'd expect more PRs in the low priority for balance purposes, but that's purely speculation.
This line doesn't come from scum. At least it is highly unlikely.
can you elaborate?

Sure,

I personally don't understand why scum would say that here rather than their private day chat. Scum!Rat is basically PR hunting then since he's arguing for us to give out our priority levels. As scum, I sure as hell wouldn't ask you to give me your priorities because I'm thinking the Pr's might be related to the levels. That last bit would be under lock and key.

It just comes off as town with a loose tongue in my opinion. If the assassin hands the target a drink, does he tell him it's poisoned?

Chickadee · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:48 pm

I'm scum reading Flub. Their reads on Nos and myself are odd. Moreso the one on Nos. I think everything Nos has done has been town here. And if Flub is scum, I need to see how things unfold but I think I have one of their scum partners.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 12:15 am

I can almost respect that you think my nos read is "odd" but the read on you, not so much

Flubbernugget · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 12:32 am

In post 325, mozamis wrote:
In post 319, Chickadee wrote:Moza has flipped his opinions around completely multiple times in short time spans with no explanations.
I AM GIVING OUT READS. AND CHANGING MY OPINIONS AS TEH AFCTS CHANGE. YOU MAKE A SCUMMY POST, I CHANGE MY MIND.
I have probably been the most transparent person in this game.
You are either being very dense, or you are scum. What happend to you being really busy at the weekend? And your other reads?

I agree that chickadee is making a bad push against you here, but it's ignorance at best to assume you're being transparent.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:04 am

14 still

Nosferatu · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:09 am

are two people catching up at once

havingfitz · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:41 am

Two of my three suspects are voting my 3rd suspect with two of my townreads. bleh

Chickadee · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:08 am

In post 512, havingfitz wrote:Two of my three suspects are voting my 3rd suspect with two of my townreads. bleh

Seems like a good time to reevaluate then?

havingfitz · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:31 am

Makes me doubt my Allo read more than of those on that wagon.

Aubrey · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:28 am

I wouldn't cry if he got lynched. I've been debating moving my vote to him a good bit. Especially after he did nothing after the prod beyond state the obvious. Which might I add was directed at a relatively new statement. Within 20 minutes he read 100 posts, and solely commented on one of the most relevant (if not irrelevant) topics at hand.

Do I think his slot is an easy place to vote? Sure. Do I think it's justifiable to scum read him, pretty much now. Again, I only hesitate due to that supposed catchup, and not knowing about the scum day chat directly after my blunder. I'm getting to the point where I don't know if that makes up for his play though.

I almost wanted to say that he is probably new, and doesn't know what to exactly do. However, I quickly decided that isn't townish because he'd act the same way as scum. So

Aubrey · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:50 am

20 minutes after complaining. 6 pages worth of content, and all we get is an obvious statement? K

havingfitz · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:16 am

In post 516, Aubrey wrote:20 minutes after complaining. 6 pages worth of content, and all we get is an obvious statement? K

?

Aubrey · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:31 am

Look at his ISO and take into account the post #'s and Time stamps.

Aubrey · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:44 am

In short,

He either did the biggest skim ever once he was prodded

(assuming he had not been checking the thread up to that point)

, or he was actively lurking. I can't imagine being able to critically consider 6 pages worth of content in 20 minutes. And even if he were actively lurking, or able to critically consider all that info, you can't tell me he shouldn't have been able to vocally further a read, change a read, bring forward an opinion, or at least pressure/ask a question at some point within 6 pages.

It's just seems as if he was prodded, needed to say

something

, so he commented on something small in order to go back to lurking.

--

So Fitz, what are your thoughts?

havingfitz · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:57 am

Changed mind on Allo....slight tr for now.

P.edit....thoughts on what?

Are you talking about Allo?

Aubrey · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:01 am

LOL, Fitz. Use context clues here. Yes.

havingfitz · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:20 am

In post 521, Aubrey wrote:LOL, Fitz. Use context clues here. Yes.

Ok...what does 20 minutes have to do with Allo? That context is not evident to me.

Aubrey · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:32 am

I'm confused as to what you're not understanding about it. refer back to 519. I'm being point blank on the matter.

havingfitz · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:25 am

I read 519. Where are you getting the 20 minute part from?