Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
K I'm less interested in pursuing the line I was going down now because it's less juicy without the 2nd data point.
Ya'll still scummy and I'm still gonna read Vax after dinner to see if Dan's got anything
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
In post 1158, Bulbazak wrote:You were trying to get a lynch in the most underhanded manner possible and hoping no one would notice.
Man what? People can look at posting history's for themselves.
I stated, factually, that he was posting on site. See evidence: his post.
He also had not posted for a long time in thread when I posted this. Time uncertain because IDGAF but I read the thread and it didn't contain enough Eddie for my liking. Fact #2
So it's great and all and he came in, and if he was townposting that's the end of that. So he's not.
You act like someone says "X is posting elsewhere" and everyone else just abandonds logic and quicklynches them. What was that you said about me? Stop playing dumb? Well call me rubber because ur glue.
Eddie, as a player and person, is a VERY busy individual. In the last month alone, Eddie has not had a day off to just sit down and rest/relax until YESTERDAY (30 days of basically running around doing errands and shit, it's a long list of fuck all and I don't feel like I
NEED
to explain why I wouldn't be completely around 24/7 365) and I'm starting to get a sinus cold from the feel of it, fact.
Like, i can understand smacking my dental posts. That's fine. But if anything, I've been more so asking questions of people to get a better understanding on things, as well as trying to find their intent behind it. Am I focusing on certain players when I ask those questions? Yes. However, I'm also paying attention to what everyone else is doing. I don't -need- to be super aggressive with my hunting style. I prefer the laid back, watch things, and THEN leap approach. Especially on day 1 because a lot of the time, unless it's INCREDIBLY obvious, you're not catching scum day 1. I've lived with that fact since I've been playing the game off and on for 9 years now
Bulbazak wrote:I also know how Eddie thinks and how he meant that. That was confusion.
Because "there's 2 people who are on the chopping block. I'll vote one over the other, but instead of voting said person, let me go THIS direction instead." Like, what?! Why?! Vaxx, as far as I am concerned, is neutral right now and was going to be a priority sort day 2.
Bulbazak wrote:And if he does start to prepare his way to go after Dan, I'll grab the rope myself.
I'd be a fool to mistrust my gut at this stage in my life. You won't need to grab the rope.
5 players voting for Lycanfire (ActionDan, Vaxkiller, Bulbazak, EddieFenix, Desperado)
5 players voting for Bulbazak (drealmerz7, Lycanfire, chesskid3, Not_Mafia, Srceenplay)
Ginngie, is there a reason you're not listed as a voter?
-----------
I don't like either of the main wagons. If I had to chose between the two, I'd vote Lycan only because I like it's composition better. I'm sheeping Snarky so he can actually confirm something.
VOTE: Toby Determined
The more I stare at this, the more I realize that judging these wagons by whatever probable town/scum values sly is giving to the wagons' participants to determine some sort of composition metric makes no objective sense.
The rest of the iso is quote walls with barely anything tangible in them.
I'm ok with a Vax wagon. I will also join the Sly wagon.
Unvote
Vote: SlySly
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
5 players voting for Lycanfire (ActionDan, Vaxkiller, Bulbazak, EddieFenix, Desperado)
5 players voting for Bulbazak (drealmerz7, Lycanfire, chesskid3, Not_Mafia, Srceenplay)
Ginngie, is there a reason you're not listed as a voter?
-----------
I don't like either of the main wagons. If I had to chose between the two, I'd vote Lycan only because I like it's composition better. I'm sheeping Snarky so he can actually confirm something.
VOTE: Toby Determined
The more I stare at this, the more I realize that judging these wagons by whatever probable town/scum values sly is giving to the wagons' participants to determine some sort of composition metric makes no objective sense.
The rest of the iso is quote walls with barely anything tangible in them.
VOTE: SlySly
Quit talking out of your ass.
Not_Mafia is conftown. That alone makes the Bulbazak wagon better. I also have dreamlz in my strong townreads. Those together outweigh my TR's on ActionDan and Bulbazak.
"SlySly is the scummiest player on the site." ~DrippingGoofball
^ pls park your vote on Bulb for the wagon possibilities then Mr Slysly
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
In post 1193, SlySly wrote:Not_Mafia is conftown. That alone makes the Bulbazak wagon better. I also have dreamlz in my strong townreads. Those together outweigh my TR's on ActionDan and Bulbazak.
And in the post I just quoted you said you'd vote lycan
In post 1193, SlySly wrote:Not_Mafia is conftown. That alone makes the Bulbazak wagon better. I also have dreamlz in my strong townreads. Those together outweigh my TR's on ActionDan and Bulbazak.
After re-reading what I said, I see what was confusing you, Action. The bolded should have said Bulbazak. It's easy to see which wagon I prefer in the following. That was a mistype on my part. I didn't see it until I responded. I retract the "talking out of your ass". My bad.
In post 1193, SlySly wrote:Not_Mafia is conftown. That alone makes the Bulbazak wagon better. I also have dreamlz in my strong townreads. Those together outweigh my TR's on ActionDan and Bulbazak.
"SlySly is the scummiest player on the site." ~DrippingGoofball
Ok, that makes more sense, but I also don't like the way you're going about making your decision between the two based on wagon composition alone as well. These are 4 vs 4 or 5 vs 5 where town reads are on both, though I suppose less so currently on lycan's. Not_mafia and Desp have both switched between them as well.
If you think they are both town you should be fighting for something else that isn't toby. And if you can't think of an alternative and have to choose between one of lycan and bulb because of external factors like deadlines, you should not rely on the wagon composition alone. Perhaps after rereading youll fine one is more town than the other. And even if you think they are both equally town at least say so.