Reactions from Adilm29h Mafia Power Claim:
adilm29h
: First post-claimed mafia power role. Says he claimed roleblocker to generate discussion and make things more interesting. Don't like his logic of "who ever is 100% positive i am scum i have a scum lean on them" as his logic hinges on he himself being town (as he claims). I do not like his arguments on Clemency at all. Top Policy/Scum lynch for the day.
Clemency:
Believes Adilm is most likely town. Votes him. Expresses intent to keep the vote on andilm. Feels strongly to lynch Adilm.
Fenraiser (replaced Jamiet99uk)
: No posts from my slot
Archwing
:
Had a pretty indifferent reaction to Adilm's claim. Maintains that indifference to this post.
SIV36
:
Will be amazed if this one is scum. Takes charge of town, and while not alignment indicative, it seems to be a good sign. Kinda neutral to adilm, but willing to policy lynch to clear it up.
Maestro (SE)
:
Interestingly, comments directly on the wagon first rather than Adilm.
In post 52, Maestro wrote: In post 51, SIV36 wrote:^Not to mention that the player with the wagon pretty well [paraphrased] "Hi guys, I'm a mafia role-blocker, and I just have a quick question about it" It wouldn't be much of a stretch that all the people on the wagon are suspicious towns.
This is almost certainly not what happened.
They probably misunderstood something or meant to post it elsewhere, I'm not sure, but thinking they were scumclaiming in their first post isn't "suspicious Towns" ( btw
), it's just wishful thinking, and at best silly. Virtuoso at least should be able to think a little more critically than this; I don't place much trust in the rest of you, but V is an IC.
A lot of focus on the wagon rather than Andilm. This is what stood out most to me. Don't know exactly what to think of it yet, but I can see it more easily from a mafia POV. Although, if Maestro genuinely belives Andilm is town, this seems understandable.
In addition, defends andilm very strongly. Uses lack of self-preservation as part of a defense. But, he put a logical progression steps that seem to make sense. His position seems to be that since he can't see scum doing what andilm is doing logically, he cannot believe that andilm is most likely scum.
In addition, seems content to vote Virtuoso over Andilm.
FancyPants (SE)
:
Believe this is the first person to pull up meta against adilm. Says that andilm is prone to making gambits. Not against lynching andilm.
Rubicon (SE)
:
From his initial andim reaction, he totally believed that andim was scum at the time.
In post 16, Rubicon wrote:VOTE: virtuoso
Good morning. With one scum outed, the next step is to find their partner. I didn't really like the way virtuoso's reacted just now. It's hard to put into words, it just didn't feel completely genuine.
Says later that the andilm claim is null, but comments that andilm's silence is not so good. This is strange, although I can't ping it as town or scum atm.
In post 26, Rubicon wrote:I think you are either too eager to see him lynched immediately, because he is town and you are mafia,
or
you are his partner and know he messed up so badly that you think you have to vote him for appearances.
Aimed towards Virtuoso. Good insight, but null as it isn't definite.
Virtuoso (IC)
:
In post 12, Virtuoso wrote: In post 11, adilm29h wrote:hey guys as roleblocker, why did the game start b4 i could do an action?
Da fuq did you really just scum claim like that?
VOTE: adilm29h
Don't really get why people think the reaction is not genuine. I could see mafia/town saying this.
Very adamant in pushing Andilm to be lynched.
Comments:
Adilm's claim as well as his reasons are faulty. Likely scum.
Virtuoso seems pretty good, as does Fancy (would also like to see more posts) and SIV and Clemency.
Maestro and Rubicon are kind of iffy atm b/c [look at the entries on them in my post], Maestro more so. Rubi is iffy, but could see Rubi as town. Although, Maestro's logic is good, but the order of his concern seems out of place.
Arch is null, but might actually turn up as scum.
