Mini Normal 1948: BooneyToonz V - The Boon 'N Bed Express!

Chip Butty · Post Post #1150 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:21 am

In post 1119, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 698, Dunkerdoodles wrote:hardclaim cop with red on mulch
VOTE: mulch

In post 699, Fykus wrote:VOTE: mulch

In post 700, Mulch wrote:LMAO

VOTE: Dunkerdoodles

You can't have targeted me last night LOL
Can you guys check this theory and tell me if I'm being dumb here:

1. Town.Mulch commutes N1
2. Town.Dunker shoots Mulch N1, but learns his shot didn't go through and concludes Mulch is scum.
3. Town.Dunker hardclaims cop to prevent Mulch from fakeclaming commuter, and accuses Mulch.
4. Scum.Fykus, who didn't force-commute Mulch at all, and thus doesn't know that a cop investigation of Mulch wouldn't go through, jumps on the Mulch wagon.
5. Mulch knows a cop investigation of him would have failed and suspects Dunker of fakeclaiming.
6. 1v1 clusterfuck etc.

So...Town.Mulch, Town.Dunker, Scum.Fykus

Also, enchanted princess sounds like someone is taking the piss...

In post 1149, Tchill13 wrote:You said it was scum v scum? I agree with that chip. Why are you saying they'll be mislynched?

Because now i think this is what happened. Did you even fucking read it before leaping to judgement?

Chip Butty · Post Post #1151 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:23 am

It explains that sequence #698-#700 perfectly.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1152 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:25 am

You said 900 something you didn't point out that post.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1153 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:26 am

In post 1148, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1142, Chip Butty wrote:It was my #946 that put the spotlight back on them until now.

In post 1145, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1143, Tchill13 wrote:OK I understand you're trying to get town cred right here but fykus is really the only reason they're gonna get lynched.
If by lynched you mean mislynched, I agree.
Well in your mind if they're "mislynched" it's your fault because you put the spot light back on them. So bravo chip butty if they're "mislynched".

I've done my best to prevent it. If people push on with it, it won't be my fault.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1154 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:27 am

In post 1152, Tchill13 wrote:You said 900 something you didn't point out that post.

What?

Tchill13 · Post Post #1155 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:28 am

OK. So you put the spotlight on them then tried to prevent... I frankly believe your break down is a possibility but I don't think it happened. If they flip town though then I don't mind lynching fykus.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1156 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:30 am

Let's lynch mulch. If he's scum we lynch dunker. If he's town we lynch fykus. Trading a townie for a scum is fine. We also have a possibility of catching 2 scum with this. I don't see why you'd push against that.

Theta Alpine · Post Post #1157 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:33 am

wait i have a question

is fykus ever town in this

whether or not dunker and mulch are town/scum fykus lied about his role and used it to push someone else

Chip Butty · Post Post #1158 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:51 am

In post 1156, Tchill13 wrote:Let's lynch mulch. If he's scum we lynch dunker. If he's town we lynch fykus. Trading a townie for a scum is fine. We also have a possibility of catching 2 scum with this. I don't see why you'd push against that.

I'm not lynching Mulch or Dunker unless someone can show me an alternative theory that explains #698-#700 including the Fykus vote on Mulch, and in which Mulch and/or Dunker are scum and Fykus isn't.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1159 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:59 am

FoS @ Tchill. He's arguing like he knows Fykus is going to hang but wants to take at least one of Mulch/Dunker down first.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1160 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:45 am

Yeah I'm pretty sure mulch will get lynched without your vote. He should anyways. There was a no kill, Mulch commuted, yet assembler is scummier? I don't want fykus to hang. Fykus is a hard town read from me. His gambit would be a townie for scum and scum isn't going to want to do that. I realized that on my reread.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1161 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:47 am

Which gives us even more reason to lynch mulch. Let's say that is his gambit and that's why he wanted to lynch dunker THEN mulch. If we lynch mulch here and see a flip we get info on fykus and dunker. If we lynch dunker we only get info on mulch. If we lynch fykus and he flips what he claims where does that leave us? Lynching mulch? Which is what we should do today anyways.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1162 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:50 am

In post 1159, Chip Butty wrote:FoS @ Tchill. He's arguing like he knows Fykus is going to hang but wants to take at least one of Mulch/Dunker down first.

You're play this day phase seems like you're either trying to come off as a genius and making things more complicated than they actually are.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1163 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:50 am

Either shouldn't be in there.

Havo · Post Post #1164 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:51 am

In post 1151, Chip Butty wrote:It explains that sequence #698-#700 perfectly.

And you being Mulch's scum partner would explain perfectly why you're going halfway around the world to save Mulch when he indeed scum claimed.

Scum Fykus isn't going to out his self to take out 2 townies like this.

Havo · Post Post #1165 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:54 am

MULCH SCUM CLAIMED AND THEN VOTED HIMSELF!!!!!!

Anyone against a Mulch lynch right now is SCUM or completely incompetent.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1166 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:55 am

In post 1164, Havo wrote:
In post 1151, Chip Butty wrote:It explains that sequence #698-#700 perfectly.
And you being Mulch's scum partner would explain perfectly why you're going halfway around the world to save Mulch when he indeed scum claimed.

Scum Fykus isn't going to out his self to take out 2 townies like this.

EXACTLY. Chip butty is refusing to vote either because there's a tiny, tiny chance it all lined up like that. That's very scummy if mulch does indeed flip scum. So there's another player we get info on once mulch flips... Keep them coming.

Theta Alpine · Post Post #1167 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:56 am

fykus voted someone for a guilty investigation while knowing that the guilty investigation was impossible

anyone against a fykus lynch right now is scum or completely incompetent

Havo · Post Post #1168 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:00 am

In post 1167, Theta Alpine wrote:fykus voted someone for a guilty investigation while knowing that the guilty investigation was impossible

anyone against a fykus lynch right now is scum or completely incompetent

Why did Mulch claim and vote himself?

Tchill13 · Post Post #1169 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:00 am

In post 1167, Theta Alpine wrote:fykus voted someone for a guilty investigation while knowing that the guilty investigation was impossible

anyone against a fykus lynch right now is scum or completely incompetent

Can you please reword this.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1170 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:02 am

In post 1168, Havo wrote:
In post 1167, Theta Alpine wrote:fykus voted someone for a guilty investigation while knowing that the guilty investigation was impossible

anyone against a fykus lynch right now is scum or completely incompetent
Why did Mulch claim and vote himself?

Mulch voted himself because he thought he would be quick hammered. Once the incompetent townies decided not to do that he removed his vote in hopes he'd actually live another day phase. Which is exactly why he's not posting much defending himself because he hopes town talks themselves in circles and decides to go in another direction. Good job mulch it's working.

Mulch · Post Post #1171 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:03 am

I never claimed scum and if I was scum I wouldn’t vote myself

Tchill13 · Post Post #1172 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:04 am

Besides I want to see if I'm like 8/8 on mulch now.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1173 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:04 am

In post 1171, Mulch wrote:I never claimed scum and if I was scum I wouldn’t vote myself

Lurk alert. I've seen you do things people would never dream of doing as both alignments so I'm not buying that.

Theta Alpine · Post Post #1174 (ISO) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:05 am

fykus claims he commuted mulch
therefore any actions targeting mulch would fail

then dunker voted mulch citing a guilty investigation
fykus immediately followed it by voting mulch thus displaying that fykus believed the guilty investigation

as for why mulch voted himself
no clue

but he did not claim scum

p-edit
that is actually a reason to believe him