17 Kilos of Cocaine - [GAME OVER]

chesskid3 · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:12 pm

Oh yay it works

Bulbazak · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 1:22 am

In post 443, Cephrir wrote:Bulbazak has to do a lot more to get a townread from me and if you know what's good for you you will also apply a rigorous standard to him

In post 454, grapes wrote: The scumread has everything to do with it, it makes more sense from a town mindset to engage a scumread and create noise/discussion there than with someone you don't have a read on when given the option.

That actually doesn't make sense at all. Yes you want to create discussion with a scum read to allow you to better read the slot, but that also applies to non-scumreads as well. If anything, focusing on just players you scum read to create noise is more likely to come from scum.

In post 458, Kagami wrote:I guess this is already discussed on page 3, but I don't see much value in keeping it a secret who has 0.

To keep scum guessing? I mean, gee, why would we want to possibly tell scum who not to pay attention to?

In post 472, chesskid3 wrote: I dont like Kagami btw

Agreed. Getting similar vibes to Xyzzy. With Hito, I was seeing someone trying to figure out the best way to use the mechanic in favor of the town. Not seeing that from Kagami, and it feels more like empty posting to appear townie. Xyzzy's contribution was just as empty, and I felt like he was trying to jump onto the same mechanic discussion bandwagon as Hito for easy town points.

Kagami · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 1:57 am

Hito, it is a very good thing if scum lies about having 0 when in fact they have non-zero.

Bulbazak · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:12 am

I am no longer interested in Kagami now.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:39 am

In post 472, chesskid3 wrote:I dont like Kagami btw

"someone else is talking and I find it confusing and scary"

Spiffeh · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:26 am

hey guys

ISO · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:16 am

In post 469, xRECKONERx wrote:ceph are you scum?

[Mythical right answer to this question]

ISO · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:18 am

If you wanna talk about your UT townread that's cool but I do realize it's unlikely any of us would understand

xRECKONERx · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:23 am

no, nobody would, probably

let's call it 8 years of metagut and move on

Firebringer · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 10:55 am

I think u said something like that in defcon game and ut was scum.

Ginngie · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:01 am

VOTE: Ellibirth

Fire, I need granddad's help come join

Firebringer · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:11 am

Granddad is getting to old to be moving around like that

Ginngie · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:13 am

I'll get you some hard candy

Firebringer · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:33 am

Ginngie · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:34 am

Firebringer · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:36 am

Xyzzy is scummier and I don't even see anything either way on ellibereth

chesskid3 · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:54 am

In post 478, Bulbazak wrote:I am no longer interested in Kagami now.

In post 479, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 472, chesskid3 wrote:I dont like Kagami btw
"someone else is talking and I find it confusing and scary"

????

Kagami · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:00 pm

Btw, chesskid, I'd been wondering for a while, are you the chessdude of hearthstone fame?

Ellibereth · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:01 pm

he's not
he sucks at hearthstone

chesskid3 · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:02 pm

In post 493, Ellibereth wrote:he's not
he sucks at hearthstone

fuck u elli

chessdude copied the SHIT out of my name and my lawsuit is pending

Ellibereth · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:03 pm

he's also better than you at chess

though I WILL admit you are older
and more likely to win a lawsuit

Firebringer · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:05 pm

Elli what r u doing?

Ellibereth · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:08 pm

Chilling with chess.
Eating some ramen.
Deciding how to write some emails.

How's your day been.

Firebringer · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 12:12 pm

Pretty boring.
Just ate , trying to make plans with friends for tonight.

ActionDan · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Sat Sep 23, 2017 1:54 pm

In post 454, grapes wrote:
In post 442, ActionDan wrote:Scum read or not before they got into it me and Bulb asked the same basic question in the same basic way, basically.
The scumread has everything to do with it, it makes more sense from a town mindset to engage a scumread and create noise/discussion there than with someone you don't have a read on when given the option. I'll concede that the "no" was kinda cheeky; but I'm not sure that's scummy or why you think the order of events with that is particularly noteworthy.

Why's firebringer your top town?

I don't think there needs to be "an option". You could answer both. That said I should have phrased the question differently because it didn't accurately reflect what transpired. It's not necessarily scummy as it was weird/off-putting, and again, I thought it deserved a followup.

FB is a top town read for the exact opposite of what Xyzzy said, that is, I think he's behaving differently than when he was scum in the last fakegod game I played with him in. He's a bit more serious here and I've liked his reads so far and his posts are just, better.