In post 58, Realeo wrote:I asked that question as a sanity checking and to gauge people's tolerance.
Sanity checking is important because sometimes you off your mark and see something and too confident for it, so you need to actively benchmark your parameter once in a while.
Gauge people's tolerance is simply to test people consistency's in future.
You have been consistent with your tolerance with voting me and townleaning CK so I don't really think it's scummy.
The only thing that triggered me was your "If the game ends here" readlist, which I think triggeres Alchemist, but I'm not sure why his action is "Vote this scum bag" instead of "There are lot of unexplained variables. Would you mind to elaborate?" so you're kinda in the waiting list because he have higher priority.
I'm sorry but do you have an example of you doing this before as town? You're using terms I've never heard of like "sanity check" so this is either a thing you've actively done before or you're pulling an excuse out your bum.
If by "gauge people's tolerance" you mean see how they approach reads; then I suppose that's reasonable explanation for why you asked the question about commknight's entrance in the first place.
But what we're talking about is again why your read on commknight itself changed.
I'm gonna toss you another question because your last two lines are also interesting to me; why do your concerns with alchemist have anything to do with me outside the fact that your concerns are centered on his concerns of me?
In post 62, Alchemist21 wrote:The other interpretation is that you're reads are ill-conceived because they're rushed out. Not necessarily AI. If he was calling you scum he would have voted you. He could have been withholding a read on you one way or the other until seeing your reaction to
36.
Though you're right that I keep forgetting about the part of your issue being that you think it's not an original thought. Even so I just don't see the malice in riddleton's post that you're claiming is there. I think a vote would have been in that post if he was actually trying to take the idea and use it against you.
P.S. I was using the term "poke" to mean a minor aggression, not as in to poke around and investigate.
I feel like that's a pretty charitable stretch of an interpretation. But fair enough I guess;
On a similar note I'm glad that we know who riddleton was now that was gonna bother me if I had to figure that out on my own. : P
And my read there is now teetering a bit because duckworth, albeit delayed somewhat did put a vote down after fosing me as riddleton.
So meh.
Interested to see him talk about other people.
It really depends. But it's normally
Town/Null/Scum
In post 72, IceGuy wrote: In post 41, grapes wrote:
Not to literal you to death but at this point I don't have a read on anyone based on three words.
But I mean different strokes for different blokes; I don't enjoy sitting around until some arbitrary word count to happen on page 3 in order to stop censoring myself so that people don't immediately discredit me based on playstyle for giving thoughts as they come to me.
You made a list of people you consider town/null/scum. This list included people who've posted three words and people that aren't in the game. You posted things that look like they're useful to town, but aren't.
Why's it my fault I happened into a game with a bunch-o by the book nerdlings?
I had this thought the other day; to me the game's a lot like a bunch of simultaneous ping-pong matches representing the colors of the blocks of one of those slider puzzles. The matches are your and everyone else's interactions with each other and the slider puzzle is the game as a whole.
There's two layers to it. So with experience, meta, Poe, gut, interactions and other cool things taking a stab at solving the game page 2 becomes more of an accomplishable task.
And just to make myself clearer; I don't require a lot of content from a player to get even sometimes very strong reads.
That's how I play.
You think it's ridiculous, I think it's ridiculous how overcomplicated and robot like some people make their solving.
But I'm not gonna call you scum for it.
And I'm certainly not gonna discredit you for it; we only just met.
IceGuy wrote:I also really don't like the way how you vote everybody who attacks you.
I'm not sure where you're getting this from; I've only voted for duckworth and Realeo so far.
In post 97, Realeo wrote:Ney, the misrepping is "everybody who attacks you". I don't attack him yet he still vote him.
But sure. I can give you pass for that.
"No that's not what I was talking about"
"But I'll give you a pass anyway"
?
In post 98, IceGuy wrote:You said you want to retract your town lean, that implies you think he's scum now.
Oh I see what's happening here you're not really reading the game.
Realeo retracted his townread on commknight based on the concesus not agreeing with him; I've actually talked about this a bit, iso grapes for detail and let me know what you think.
