Mini 1947: Board Game uPick: The Expansion! Game Over

Randomnamechange · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:25 am

VOTE: morph the cat

ISO · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:26 am

In post 577, Arcade Pals wrote:
In post 411, Arcade Pals wrote:
In post 401, Something_Smart wrote:though to be fair, it looks like they were right.
How does it look like we're right? You realize if rc slot is scum he has to play it casual until the votecount and call Morph a liar then. Freaking out about it before a votecount appears would only look bad. I don't think you should be able to tell what is happening yet from reactions

Sorry I missed this in all the rapid posting. I don't believe that what he did was scum!RC's only option; he could have pushed on it as an obvious gambit from the beginning, or he could have preemptively claimed a role that would cause the investigation to fail (like ascetic). He could even have preemptively claimed mason, lol. The reason I thought that he wouldn't play into this as scum is that any of the above would have given him a lower chance of being lynched than doing what he did.

Additionally, there was a worst-case scenario element. Having low expectations is good because it makes it harder to be disappointed, and so I was operating under the assumption that RC was town because there was no downside to making that assumption, even if it turned out to be wrong.

In post 632, Mad King Ashnard wrote:
In post 631, TwoInAMillion wrote:I don't trust M k a at all I do trust morph
Well, then you're not very good at this game are you? Assuming that you're town ofc.

Are you saying that a good player would ignore a guilty and trust the unsupported mason claim instead?

Regardless of your reads, that's just mechanically stupid.

In post 640, Mad King Ashnard wrote:So it feels to me more like you and Morph are trying to rush the lynch before my mason buddy can show up so that you get the lynch through.

Right, that's why they specifically said not to let you get above L-2...

Also if you're banking everything on your mason buddy verifying you, you might as well just claim who it is. Pretty sure that the actions of you and others have narrowed it down to {WhyMafia, Drixx} anyway, so you're not helping much by keeping it hidden.

ISO · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:29 am

Oh and this should be obvious.

If you're town, and you're neighbors with RC:

I don't care how towny he's been in the neighborhood, or how persuasive an argument he makes.

Do not

fakeclaim masons with him.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:34 am

They said that earlier yeah: so I didn't bite at the time.

I am busy with RL. Mafia can wait. No one in this game is dumb enough to fakeclaim masons with me.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:35 am

Odds of a launcher are very low considering no third party in this hame

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:35 am

Lyncher

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:35 am

Sorry phone posting

ISO · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:38 am

In post 589, morph the cat wrote:@whoever said it was a d12. Lolnope:

I don't know the game, lol. I was just referring to the fact that you picked one target out of 12 possible targets.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:38 am

Since no launcher likely that increases the odds of the day cop claim being real. Could be a scum day cop but with only 3 scum that would reduce them from 3 to 2 if they are caught and a poor scum gambit.

gerryoat · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:38 am

Random are you the mason

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:41 am

Can you not Gerry?

If my partner had to claim they have to claim and I'm not holding it against town given -RC- but I would rather the pool not be reduced if it doesn't have to.

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:43 am

Like don't get me wrong I totally get it.

But we have ten days to to.

ISO · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:44 am

The pool is 2 people.

It's too late to say "I'd rather the pool not be reduced if it doesn't have to".

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:45 am

I'd rather they not get explicitly outed with no say in the matter.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:50 am

@Mad do you think lynching you is a strong play regardless of your true alignment and if not what strategy do you recommend at this point and why

Arcade Pals · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:52 am

VOTE: mad
Look at me claiming a role that's clear but i have nothing to back it up

Out the partner or die

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:52 am

Man read between the lines here.

It's Drixx and he's in the hospital so chill tf out

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:53 am

Unvote me or you're scumclaiming AP.

ISO · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:53 am

UNVOTE:
Now we wait.

Arcade Pals · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:54 am

Lol you think threats scare me cute.
I'll unvote when Drixx comes and confirms it

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:54 am

In post 669, Arcade Pals wrote:Lol you think threats scare me cute.
I'll unvote when Drixx comes and confirms it

What have I been asking you to do?

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:54 am

So you're claiming there is a launcher in a game with no 3rd party and your mason partner is mysteriously gone.

Arcade Pals · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:54 am

I must go to the dentist for bow will check back later

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:55 am

Lyncher

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:55 am

I'm saying that they are a scum role which is forced to pick a 1v1 day one for some reason and got away with it.