Mini 1947: Board Game uPick: The Expansion! Game Over

Porkens · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:00 pm

>...error...

WhyMafia · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:25 pm

@Random so who do you think has been scummy

gerryoat · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:34 pm

VOTE: mad enough of this nonsense

Arcade Pals · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:48 pm

So what are we waiting for

ISO · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:49 pm

that question has already been asked and answered

Porkens · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:07 pm

DO IT SO MAF CAN THINK ABOUT WHAT TO DO

Porkens · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:18 pm

Seriously I will yell at you guys. This has been pissing me off all day.

The town players in this game need to turn on and start working together while the scum, apparently, are unable to do so. Or we just stop pretending that the game isn't beyond repair if king flips scum while his partner is on Sickleave (and with all symapthy because I do really care about the health and well being of each and every one of you) was nobody's fault. But scum are done. If that's what it is, I propose, out of consideration of the work and effort that went into this game. This seems like a swingy setup that swung hard day one. It's fun! Don't get me wrong, but I offer the scum a chance to surrender in order that the mods can rerun. I like what I'm seeing here a lot, but if I just spent a month in a game where it got hard because of bad feelings and

mistrust

. I believe both claims, except mad kings is clearly a scumrole. Because unless you guys are in late stage rolefaking mastery, both those claims seem legit. Let's do 2 out of three and reroll.

At this point I am just discussing with you the idea as a concept. This is intentionally not an "at mod" post. I want to discuss this as a group.

If you agree with me, sign...
-charter 2.0
You know the drill.

Signed...
Porkens

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:23 pm

In post 760, Porkens wrote:
@MOD

The wikki on Mason is inconclusive. If there were "Masons" in this setup, is it a certainty that they would be alignment confirmed to one another?

In post 769, Porkens wrote:>...Input received...
>...probability of lynching outside Morph/King...0%
>...relevance of "partner" claim...0%
>...Advise: Lynch with all haste possible haste...
>...love mode engaged...

Wait did the mods say that masons were not alignment confirming?

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:24 pm

In post 782, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 760, Porkens wrote:
@MOD

The wikki on Mason is inconclusive. If there were "Masons" in this setup, is it a certainty that they would be alignment confirmed to one another?

In post 769, Porkens wrote:>...Input received...
>...probability of lynching outside Morph/King...0%
>...relevance of "partner" claim...0%
>...Advise: Lynch with all haste possible haste...
>...love mode engaged...
Wait did the mods say that masons were not alignment confirming?

Porkens · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:26 pm

No, of course not

Porkens · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:27 pm

Shit, sorry guys. I guessed right, right?

Porkens · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:31 pm

SORRY I DIDNT DO IT SOONER!

>...shutting down...

morph the cat · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:40 pm

Really confused right now. But uh... We have our reads out so if you all choose to proceed without waiting for drixx I guess I wont cry forever but meh.

morph the cat · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:43 pm

They're ignoring you question but Masons that not explicitly town confirmed to each other are explicitly bastard. Which this game was explicitly marked as not bastard.

morph the cat · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:44 pm

Our two claims are therefore explicitly incompatible. Either you believe me that I have a daycop guilty, or you think rc is a town mason and I am a fake ling scum role who has a very good reason to blow myself up on rc day one.

morph the cat · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:44 pm

But you cannot have both.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:46 pm

We are two votes short

morph the cat · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:48 pm

In post 778, Arcade Pals wrote:So what are we waiting for

Ideally, drixx. But my reads wall may be of interest to you in the meantime

Porkens · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:54 pm

that's my job, morph hahaha, sorry.

So, no I don't believe both roles are true, but the only difference is alignment. What are masons but two maf and a quiet friend?

You caught king, and king is scum.

King chose to claim mason and appoint one of his mafia brothers to name as the mason partner. In this scenario, why choose Drixx? If I am scum, its because he is not present.

Porkens · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:56 pm

Furthermore, in this scenario, the third partner is either being strongly Townsend, or is so incompetent that he is better not to align with.

On the other hand, if he is a mason, then why aren't you dead, Morph?

morph the cat · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:56 pm

I see what you mean. Do you think a world exists where king is naming drixx as a mason bud just to try and take a townie with him?

morph the cat · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:57 pm

King is still scum yes. But he might not be linked with drixx whatsoever and this is just an attempt to get something as he goes down.

Porkens · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:59 pm

morph the cat wrote:King is still scum yes. But he might not be linked with drixx whatsoever and this is just an attempt to get something as he goes down.

Then why do you want to wait?

morph the cat · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:59 pm

If you're fine accepting that the drixx slot dies( or is otherwise confirmed as an alignment) before any potential lylo then go for it. I am pretty sure action Dan is a partner. I'm less sure of drixx.

I see several worlds in which it's somebody like chikade random or creature as the third.

morph the cat · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:00 pm

In post 797, Porkens wrote:
morph the cat wrote:King is still scum yes. But he might not be linked with drixx whatsoever and this is just an attempt to get something as he goes down.

Then why do you want to wait?

I personally feel like drixx or the drixx slot will respond to this entire thing in an alignment indicative way.