Mini 1947: Board Game uPick: The Expansion! Game Over

Porkens · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:10 pm

In post 1248, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
I have a plausible theory explaining why they didn't die. But it could be inaccurate. Should I reveal or wait

I say go for it.

WhyMafia · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:12 pm

In post 1250, Porkens wrote:
In post 1248, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
I have a plausible theory explaining why they didn't die. But it could be inaccurate. Should I reveal or wait
I say go for it.

I'll wait for others to chime in

Porkens · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:13 pm

In post 1251, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1250, Porkens wrote:
In post 1248, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
I have a plausible theory explaining why they didn't die. But it could be inaccurate. Should I reveal or wait
I say go for it.
I'll wait for others to chime in

then why did you ask?

ISO · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:14 pm

In post 1248, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
I have a plausible theory explaining why they didn't die. But it could be inaccurate. Should I reveal or wait

You are in the best position to decide. I'd say only reveal if you're unlikely to stop another kill and/or you think you have a guilty.

In post 1249, Porkens wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
How do you know the mafia tried to attack someone?

It's just my opinion.

Chickadee · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:18 pm

Porkens, do you have info that would suggest scum didn't?

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:30 pm

Most likely explanation: remaining scum are actiondan and randomidget, the two most likely scum, and town directed any blocking actions against them.

Porkens · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:35 pm

Sorry everyone, if I was unclear. I was asking if anyone had an explanation, not a theory.

Porkens · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:38 pm

In post 1242, Chickadee wrote:Random hasn't posted yet.

Personally, I think it's better for town if scum doesn't know why their kill didn't go through.

but theories are fine

Chickadee, how likely do you think it is that the scum no-killed on purpose?
2, did you block either of them?

WhyMafia · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:38 pm

In post 1252, Porkens wrote:
In post 1251, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1250, Porkens wrote:
In post 1248, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
I have a plausible theory explaining why they didn't die. But it could be inaccurate. Should I reveal or wait
I say go for it.
I'll wait for others to chime in
then why did you ask?

I want a general consensus not just one opinion

morph the cat · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:38 pm

In post 1256, Porkens wrote:Sorry everyone, if I was unclear. I was asking if anyone had an explanation, not a theory.

Nothing here.

Porkens · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:38 pm

In post 1253, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 1248, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
I have a plausible theory explaining why they didn't die. But it could be inaccurate. Should I reveal or wait
You are in the best position to decide. I'd say only reveal if you're unlikely to stop another kill and/or you think you have a guilty.
In post 1249, Porkens wrote:
In post 1246, Something_Smart wrote:I think there was a no kill because the person the mafia tried to attack didn't die.
How do you know the mafia tried to attack someone?
It's just my opinion.

Why do you think the person they tried to kill didn't die?

WhyMafia · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:39 pm

Contingent on something, morph is conf town

morph the cat · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:39 pm

I think it's more likely scum actions were interfered with than not; but just to be safe let me check night deadline/timing against site-wide activity.

Porkens · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:39 pm

Thanks Morph. Why is Dan being bandwagonned?

WhyMaf, contingent on what kind of thing?

WhyMafia · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:40 pm

If anyone visited morph please claim that you visited them. It doesn't matter if you don't give what happened. Just say if you visited morph.

morph the cat · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:40 pm

I swear to acreus if any investigative role targeted us last night I will throw a shittonton of shitgibbons.

Porkens · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:40 pm

SS, did you visit anyone last night?

WhyMafia · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:41 pm

@morph are you BP

morph the cat · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:41 pm

In post 1263, Porkens wrote:Thanks Morph. Why is Dan being bandwagonned?

His really awkward post yesterday as the whole us-RC thing went down pinged the hell out of both heads here. I see you townreading him and would love to hear more about that, actually.

WhyMafia · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:41 pm

Morph I need you to claim BP/not BP in your next post

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:42 pm

Why is it necessary to know why there wasn't a no kill? Giving scum info on our roles is probably more dangerous than the info we get from the results/speculation.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:42 pm

Why there was rather

morph the cat · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:42 pm

In post 1269, WhyMafia wrote:Morph I need you to claim BP/not BP in your next post

Not BP night one. All I'm saying.

WhyMafia · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:43 pm

Well you just ruined every thought I had

WhyMafia · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:44 pm

Do not claim if you visited morph last night. I do not have a hard inno on him anymore