Mini Normal 1951 [Game Over]

sub4hire · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:11 am

In post 23, Apple Jack wrote:
In post 21, Boonskiies wrote:You guys know it’s confirmed 10-3 in the rules, right?
Who reads the rules?

UNVOTE: derpy hooves

sub4hire · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:16 am

pg 2 all of UC's posts sound super forced and awkward

VOTE: UC voyager

sub4hire · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:18 am

I like whymafia's line of questioning at the top of page 3

Alisae · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:21 am

hey why are you voting while you're catching up?

sub4hire · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:24 am

In post 84, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 43, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 39, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 35, WhyMafia wrote:NO YOU WERENT SUPPOSED TO GO BACK TO RVS
out of rvs isnt something you can force. you gotta just... let it happen lol.
We are out of RVS. I’m active right now, so I’m going to analyze.

VOTE: Assemble

Show me your town.

Was that vote on me RVS or serious?
As serious as I read your SK claim as being.
Which is to say, not at all.
UNVOTE:

In post 102, Apple Jack wrote:Yes I’m also jfsf and beck

wait, you're beck!?!?!?

Alisae · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:29 am

btw code for defining faces cuz when I wrote that I was too tired to put that wall into actual words

= Ali Happy and very like would thumbs up on fb
:/ = Ali worried

-_- = Ali not happy you sr fucked up bro
:'( = Extreme sadness
Confused Emote = Ali like Ali no like Alidunno what to do with life.

Alisae · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:31 am

_:]
that's the emote used for the happy stuff
without underscore I guess.
ok me sleep now bai bai

(Also I kinda like that for catching up without really wanting to put effort into describing stances with words and just being laaaaazy)

sub4hire · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:31 am

In post 113, Boonskiies wrote:LUV is town because he’s not sloppy as scum.

Why is town because I’m tone reading him as town, and I think as mafia he’d be pushing me here.

Tchill is town because he’s going through a play evaluation and his “players all have different playstyles” or whatever he said I don’t feel he would make as scum.

UC is town because he’s a Boon Babe now that no one should ever lynch.

Yeah.

Boon town

Apple Jack · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:39 am

In post 229, sub4hire wrote:wait, you're beck!?!?!?

That’s what I said wasn’t it

Apple Jack · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:44 am

In post 230, Alisae wrote::/ = Ali worried

weird cause you implied some of my posts worry you yet none of the ones you quoted should have

sub4hire · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:46 am

In post 233, Apple Jack wrote:
In post 229, sub4hire wrote:wait, you're beck!?!?!?
That’s what I said wasn’t it

Alisae · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:47 am

In post 234, Apple Jack wrote:
In post 230, Alisae wrote::/ = Ali worried
weird cause you implied some of my posts worry you yet none of the ones you quoted should have

My main concern about you overall is you have a lot of hard stances extremely early on

Alisae · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:50 am

Also when it comes to the miller bit I just disagree there as a player.
Also as a player I like my gambits a lot

Alisae · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:54 am

Also the dude fuckin lied about being an SK on pg 1 that's the same thing as faking a dayvig (especially considering the rules like a post or two above his post said there aren't any sky's) I am kinda concerned you took that so seriously but I can't tell if this is just a playstyle thing, or if you're just scum.

sub4hire · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:55 am

tacos does come off more desperate in the whole boon/tacos/whymafia/derpy scenario. i don't scum read the other 3, but not sure how to get them to all gel instead of scumread each other.

having said that, taco and uc not maf/maf, but having those two as top wagons today would make things interesting from an information perspective going into tomorrow

sub4hire · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:57 am

In post 164, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don’t think there has been any real or serious pressure on Robb and I think Serg is just fucking around.

don't like this read at all. if robb and serg = town, LUV = scum

Alisae · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:58 am

I think LUV says that as either alignment~

sub4hire · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:02 am

don't like alisae's 222 either

Alisae · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:04 am

I think I do that as either alignment~

sub4hire · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:04 am

In post 241, Alisae wrote:I think LUV says that as either alignment~

He's subtly calling serg town, which seems like it could be a TMI read

Alisae · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:06 am

In post 244, sub4hire wrote:
In post 241, Alisae wrote:I think LUV says that as either alignment~
He's subtly calling serg town, which seems like it could be a TMI read

I see nothing wrong with that?

Also if you saw that then you saw this :3

In post 228, Alisae wrote:hey why are you voting while you're catching up?

sub4hire · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:06 am

In post 222, Alisae wrote:More so of a "hey I'm up to speed" post

oh this quote feature of the select and quote is cool.

this is the part that i particularly didn't like about 222.

sub4hire · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:07 am

I did see that. It's a dumb question so I ignored it.

Alisae · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:07 am

Even then
That's not what LUV is saying at all about serg and I don't really think LUV has a read there.

Alisae · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:08 am

In post 246, sub4hire wrote:
In post 222, Alisae wrote:More so of a "hey I'm up to speed" post

oh this quote feature of the select and quote is cool.

this is the part that i particularly didn't like about 222.

I think I do that as either alignment~

In post 247, sub4hire wrote:I did see that. It's a dumb question so I ignored it.

why?