Why is this become more and more of a misused buzzword???In post 823, Chip Butty wrote:That's a false dichotomy
We all know scum can be on or off the wagon. I'm pointing to people who stand out in some way. Note that CK LAMISTly points to his noninvolvement in the DW lynch.
No, i used the term correctly. The false dichotomy: accusation or just for the sake of it. Third option: neither, just something to consider. You presented the available choicesas A and B but it was C.In post 823, Chip Butty wrote:It's neither. That's a false dichotomy. Reread the post. I say it can be either A or B. Obviously that's not an accusation.In post 818, Realeo wrote:Is that an official accusation of "CK is scum with Realeo or Mulch" or just saying it for the sake of saying it?
Let's avoid semantic fight again.
It is something to consider.
So you are saying for the sake of saying it, then.In post 823, Chip Butty wrote:It is something to consider.
Here.In post 824, Mulch wrote:WhereIn post 822, Realeo wrote:Let's talk about Assembrelowts, shall we? Do you buy his "testing for reaction"?In post 819, Mulch wrote:NO I didn't. I was confident, not this confident. Although, I'm less confident now, I kinda unfortuantely like his last responses
In post 744, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Una
That theory about Game being killed for his reads? Una was his strongest scumread, and my own reread also left me feeling Una is scum.
Also, the reason I was willing to join the flashwagon against Duckworth was to see how his flip would look for the people who started the flashwagon. Didn't get much out of it, though.
WTF? Do you not understand the phrase 'something to consider'? It means i said it because i want people to think about it, not 'for the sake of it'? Do you understand what 'for the sake of it' means?In post 828, Realeo wrote:So you are saying for the sake of saying it, then.In post 823, Chip Butty wrote:It is something to consider.
So you are fishing for a conclusion from other players. When someone fish a conclusion, they usually want to compare others conclusion with theirs. Just like me,In post 830, Chip Butty wrote:It means i said it because i want people to think about it
That means you are accusing me in a subtle way you know...In post 827, Chip Butty wrote:No, i used the term correctly. The false dichotomy: accusation or just for the sake of it. Third option: neither, just something to consider. You presented the available choicesas A and B but it was C.In post 823, Chip Butty wrote:It's neither. That's a false dichotomy. Reread the post. I say it can be either A or B. Obviously that's not an accusation.In post 818, Realeo wrote:Is that an official accusation of "CK is scum with Realeo or Mulch" or just saying it for the sake of saying it?
Let's avoid semantic fight again.
It is something to consider.
Realeo, if you are town, please stip fucking around and give us your thoughts on options 1 and 2 here...In post 817, Chip Butty wrote:I just had 2 thoughts re the vig pool.
1. CK suggested, reasonably enough, the DW wagon as the vig pool but has resisted the addition of Mulch and Realeo. This could be for his stated reason (pool gets too big) OR it could be because he is scum and he knows one or both of those two are scum.
In post 835, Mulch wrote:That means you are accusing me in a subtle way you know...In post 827, Chip Butty wrote:No, i used the term correctly. The false dichotomy: accusation or just for the sake of it. Third option: neither, just something to consider. You presented the available choicesas A and B but it was C.In post 823, Chip Butty wrote:It's neither. That's a false dichotomy. Reread the post. I say it can be either A or B. Obviously that's not an accusation.In post 818, Realeo wrote:Is that an official accusation of "CK is scum with Realeo or Mulch" or just saying it for the sake of saying it?
Let's avoid semantic fight again.
It is something to consider.
In post 829, Chip Butty wrote:LOL i thought i was replying to Realeo but it was Mulch who accused me of misusing the term. On my phone, i have to scroll acrosd to see avatars.
My issue is I don't know what you are telling me to think about.In post 834, Chip Butty wrote:Can you just address the actual points I raised, now that we have had the inevitable semantic discussion?
In post 838, Realeo wrote:My issue is I don't know what you are telling me to think about.In post 834, Chip Butty wrote:Can you just address the actual points I raised, now that we have had the inevitable semantic discussion?
Like, you tell me to consider CK+Realeo/Mulch. Ok, why do I have to think it's more likely? Is CK+Realeo/Mulch is a very probably scum partner that I have to give more attention? If yes, why are you voting Una instead.
So you say we should shoot people outside of the lynch zone..which is CK. Do you think rCK is likely to be scum? Why? Who is scummier, CK or Una?
Not as strong as that but i think he should be in the pool. I am suspicious of his attempt to define the pool in such a way as to exclude himself from it, even though I acknowledge there is some justification for it.In post 841, Realeo wrote:So why CK should be shot?
I'm not resisting.In post 842, Chip Butty wrote:@Realeo: It's a possibility that could be overlooked. Pointing to it as a possibility to consider is a PSA. Why are you resisting it so hard?
Now we're talking. Thank you.Chip Butty wrote:Not as strong as that but i think he should be in the pool. I am suspicious of his attempt to define the pool in such a way as to exclude himself from it, even though I acknowledge there is some justification for it.In post 841, Realeo wrote:So why CK should be shot?
Is it really though? If we were making a pool of 3 locked. Would you really even consider me in the top 3 choices to shoot? Let's not kid ourselves here. I am trying to make the pool list because I'm not really on anyone's top 3 for any pool list to shoot into. So until someone wants to come forward and case me as scummy to put me in the top 3, I do not see a single problem with leaving myself out of it. On top of that, CB has had a problem with anything I suggest that might point to him or a potential buddy. But until he presents an actual case as to not follow what I suggest, it's basically trying jump into the ocean and hoping to make a tsunami.In post 845, Realeo wrote: It's cringeworthy, indeed.
So you are tailoring the pool quite a bit. And one interpretation is that you are scum with one or both of Realeo and Mulch.In post 843, CommKnight wrote:
Yeah, let's break this down...
RealeoApproved the DW lynch but you refuse to include him in your pool.
ironstoveDidn't vote but said he'd hammer anyone he was told to. He DOES get added to to your pool.
MulchSaid he would hammer DW but you won't include him in your pool.
CommKnightYou.
UnaBombaHThe lynch, so not a contender for the vig pool.
^ Just gonna point out this is all the people currently alive that didn't vote for Duck. I even put ironstove on the pool and that's because he's done fuck all.
After being on Una before Duck and also rating the chances of Ice/Una being T/T as very low, scum.me would totally bus Una.In post 847, Mulch wrote:Theoretically if Chip and Una were scum together, do you think they would bus here?
