So adding fuel to the fire? Meh. I’m going to write you off as just paranoid and null for now.In post 237, Tchill13 wrote:I see much more motivation in that instance from scum rather than town. i believe i had 2 votes on me and errant was already one of them. Errant laid the foundation for some serious momentum. So from that view there wouldn't be much discussion about other players and less stances would have been taken. I haven't played with errant before but since this i've stated a town read on him because his breakdowns make sense and he's looking like he's trying to get multiple reads.In post 204, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 134, Tchill13 wrote:I just felt like errant brought up an issue that could lead to a lot of momentum on my wagon that could then be pushed to a Lynch.In post 127, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Low post count doesn’t mean lack of content.In post 124, Tchill13 wrote:Only scummy things I've seen so far is errant pushing me for lack of content when most players were around 5ish posts.
Do you think Errant is forcing having a strong read on you or something?I think I kind of get what you’re saying here but I also don’t really see it. Errant doesn’t strike me as the careless type.In post 136, Tchill13 wrote:The action isn't scummy it's the timing of it. Pushing someone for lack of content as soon as the game starts? Are you serious? That's why I questioned it because it's a reasonable excuse and the TIMING. Nothing better for scum to find a reasonable excuse to lead a mislynch on someone.
I find that there are players who don’t like a prolonged RVS stage or are just eager to get to game solving. Why is pushing for lack of content so early more likely to come from scum than town?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
Why is Mumble suspicious?In post 240, Tchill13 wrote:Town: Egg, Errant
lean town: Havo, LQ
Null: Schadd, thestatusquo, sergtacos
lean scum: Uzi, mumble, lalendra
Scum: acid