In post 30, Inferno390 wrote:No, there wasn't a real reason. Just that no one had thrown a vote acid's way yet.
Okay, well theory tip for next time is to have some sort of reason, even in RVS. I think you kind of did with the reaction check idea, but you need to then be able to interpret the reaction given to you!
Like, they simply said "nein" to your vote. What reaction would you expect from town? What about scum? Does this fit one of those? If not, do you think the simple shut down is a deliberate non-reaction to hide alignment?
These are all important things to ask yourself when you get the response, and things to consider whe placing the initial vote!
In post 30, Inferno390 wrote:No, there wasn't a real reason. Just that no one had thrown a vote acid's way yet.
Okay, well theory tip for next time is to have some sort of reason, even in RVS. I think you kind of did with the reaction check idea, but you need to then be able to interpret the reaction given to you!
Like, they simply said "nein" to your vote. What reaction would you expect from town? What about scum? Does this fit one of those? If not, do you think the simple shut down is a deliberate non-reaction to hide alignment?
These are all important things to ask yourself when you get the response, and things to consider whe placing the initial vote!
Alright, thanks for the tip!
Building on those ideas, I do think that it is a deliberate attempt to hide alignment. If acid had nothing to hide, she would have said more, wouldn't she? That puts at least one point against her in my book.
In post 33, Porkens wrote:Someone throw another vote on inferno for me please.
So you want to bring the pressure on me, eh? Cool. Just go ahead and start firing off your questions. If someone thinks you've got a case, I'm sure they'll throw a vote on the pile.
In post 33, Porkens wrote:Someone throw another vote on inferno for me please.
So you want to bring the pressure on me, eh? Cool. Just go ahead and start firing off your questions. If someone thinks you've got a case, I'm sure they'll throw a vote on the pile.
In post 33, Porkens wrote:Someone throw another vote on inferno for me please.
So you want to bring the pressure on me, eh? Cool. Just go ahead and start firing off your questions. If someone thinks you've got a case, I'm sure they'll throw a vote on the pile.
This comes across as a bit too defensive to me
Not defensive, casual. I'm not worried about the vote.
In post 33, Porkens wrote:Someone throw another vote on inferno for me please.
So you want to bring the pressure on me, eh? Cool. Just go ahead and start firing off your questions. If someone thinks you've got a case, I'm sure they'll throw a vote on the pile.
This comes across as a bit too defensive to me
Not defensive, casual. I'm not worried about the vote.
It did come off as quite defensive, if you weren't worried about the vote then why'd you make such a long post (relatively speaking)? Why even post in the first place?
In post 33, Porkens wrote:Someone throw another vote on inferno for me please.
So you want to bring the pressure on me, eh? Cool. Just go ahead and start firing off your questions. If someone thinks you've got a case, I'm sure they'll throw a vote on the pile.
Just an FYI, if you are in ongoing games with anyone in this game, it's best not to refer to it. The rules are very strict on this point. Even "fancy seeing you here" is probably too much.
In post 23, Aristophanes wrote:DW, what is the point of voting the person who has not yet confirmed? I see none.
Because we're in RVS, also because it'll hopefully get them to start posting sooner.
Riiiiight.
Because voting the giy who isnt here and has not even confirmed thay they will be here is toooootally going to respond sooooo much quicker because they have been voted...
Half meme, Half real, All Aristophanes ;)- JingleAri has appeared way too competent for me to even pretend to know what they're thinking
Half meme, Half real, All Aristophanes ;)- JingleAri has appeared way too competent for me to even pretend to know what they're thinking