Sorry, not familiar with the term "VI", could someone explain that please?In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Mini Normal 1952: Dragon's Dance [OVER - PERFECT SCUM WIN]
-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
-
-
acidphoenix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: June 8, 2017
-
-
acidphoenix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: June 8, 2017
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
I find it interesting that you voted TSQ, then TSQ joined the thread and instead of pushing on him, you asked him who he'd like to vote. Then you start pushing on Mumbles.In post 319, acidphoenix wrote:i don't want to lynch any of:
errant, quick, schadd, lalendra, luv, egg
at the moment
i don't really want to lynch mumble but i'd be happy with him
tchill / boon / serg / havo / tsq are the other people in the game
VOTE: tsq
Was the vote on TSQ just for show?-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
WHERE is my VOTE at?In post 378, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.-
-
acidphoenix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: June 8, 2017
-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
And if I produce a post or two where I said that what's it gonna do for you?In post 378, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.-
-
acidphoenix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: June 8, 2017
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Another fail given that your vote is on tsq whom you were talking with to debate whether to vote myself. And now you have zero reason to vote me because by your logic, because I am making good points against you this means I am not as stupid or as confusing as you first thought. Instead of defending yourself or attacking my logic, you instead deflect the issue to something else.In post 380, Havo wrote:
WHERE is my VOTE at?In post 378, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.
This is enough for a vote. Plus I would have expected Mumble to give in and start providing reads if he was Scum (he could still be Scum because he disappeared fwiw)
VOTE: HavoI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
In post 377, acidphoenix wrote:havo wanna join in the spew your alignment game
anyone can play! step right up!
I'm town.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Now you are providing random quotes to show you are Town.In post 385, Havo wrote:In post 377, acidphoenix wrote:havo wanna join in the spew your alignment game
anyone can play! step right up!
I'm town.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
LMAO, nice try. I have a scum read on you already, I posted it. IF I wanted to vote you I damn sure vote you.In post 384, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Another fail given that your vote is on tsq whom you were talking with to debate whether to vote myself. And now you have zero reason to vote me because by your logic, because I am making good points against you this means I am not as stupid or as confusing as you first thought. Instead of defending yourself or attacking my logic, you instead deflect the issue to something else.In post 380, Havo wrote:
WHERE is my VOTE at?In post 378, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.
This is enough for a vote. Plus I would have expected Mumble to give in and start providing reads if he was Scum (he could still be Scum because he disappeared fwiw)
VOTE: Havo-
-
Mumble Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: July 23, 2017
Why do you keep saying I disappeared when I'm gone for a few minutes. Am I expected to be here at beck and call?In post 384, LicketyQuickety wrote:(he could still be Scum because he disappeared fwiw)-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
What part don't you understand?In post 386, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Now you are providing random quotes to show you are Town.In post 385, Havo wrote:In post 377, acidphoenix wrote:havo wanna join in the spew your alignment game
anyone can play! step right up!
I'm town.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
-
-
acidphoenix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: June 8, 2017
extending this to quote walls periodIn post 383, acidphoenix wrote:i'm vetoing continuing to quote that wall
mumble you're not expected to be here at beck and call but when you're real time interacting with someone and leave the thread in the middle of it when they didn't stop it does look a bit
well-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
this is not even about whether you have a Scum read on me already considering you are invalidating your prior statements all over the place. Plus, the "nice try" that doesn't sound like someone who has nothing to hide. Plus its a form of deflection. Plus this invalidates that you said people get lynched for shit reasons all the time which means you have zero reason not to vote me right now unless I was right earlier when I said you invalidated yourself when you said you didn't like confusing players. You haven't indicated that I am a confusing player at this point in time and you have not stated a reason to Scum read me.In post 387, Havo wrote:
LMAO, nice try. I have a scum read on you already, I posted it. IF I wanted to vote you I damn sure vote you.In post 384, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Another fail given that your vote is on tsq whom you were talking with to debate whether to vote myself. And now you have zero reason to vote me because by your logic, because I am making good points against you this means I am not as stupid or as confusing as you first thought. Instead of defending yourself or attacking my logic, you instead deflect the issue to something else.In post 380, Havo wrote:
WHERE is my VOTE at?In post 378, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.
This is enough for a vote. Plus I would have expected Mumble to give in and start providing reads if he was Scum (he could still be Scum because he disappeared fwiw)
VOTE: Havo
There you are folks, I have offered you Scum on a silver platter.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I understand perfectly.In post 389, Havo wrote:
What part don't you understand?In post 386, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Now you are providing random quotes to show you are Town.In post 385, Havo wrote:In post 377, acidphoenix wrote:havo wanna join in the spew your alignment game
anyone can play! step right up!
I'm town.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
acidphoenix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: June 8, 2017
In post 391, acidphoenix wrote:
extending this to quote walls periodIn post 383, acidphoenix wrote:i'm vetoing continuing to quote that wall-
-
Mumble Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: July 23, 2017
Sorry for real-life stuff? I get a lot from real-time interaction, but we have a 14 day deadline. Disappearing for 30 minutes at a time and then being called out for it is a bit nonsensical.In post 391, acidphoenix wrote:mumble you're not expected to be here at beck and call but when you're real time interacting with someone and leave the thread in the middle of it when they didn't stop it does look a bit-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Not sure how you mistake Scum hunting for overreaction. I was doing this same thing earlier with people. Then I started on you and caught Scum.In post 390, Havo wrote:@ LQ,
That's a classic OMGUS vote, only I hadn't voted you.
Over REAct Much?
What has tsq posted in between the time you voting him and this that makes you want to unvote? Did your read on tsq change?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
Mumble
-
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
[quote="In [url=viewtopic.php?p=9662405#p9662405]
this is not even about whether you have a Scum read on me already considering you are invalidating your prior statements all over the place. Plus, the "nice try" that doesn't sound like someone who has nothing to hide. Plus its a form of deflection. Plus this invalidates that you said people get lynched for shit reasons all the time which means you have zero reason not to vote me right now unless I was right earlier when I said you invalidated yourself when you said you didn't like confusing players. You haven't indicated that I am a confusing player at this point in time and you have not stated a reason to Scum read me.
There you are folks, I have offered you Scum on a silver platter.[/quote]
When I posted my reads list I had 2 scum leans, you and TSQ.
I posted why I found you scummy, but my vote was still on TSQ because I was willing to give you some time since your play style was a bit sketchy.
I said I'd be ok with a wagon on you, then you went APESHIT!! At the mere mention of a WAgon on you.
Dude if this is how you're gonna play then Hell yeah, I'd be good with a wagon on You.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-