TBD Mafia 2 [game over]


User avatar
Desperado
Desperado
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Desperado
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12582
Joined: February 18, 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Post #2750 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:03 am

Post by Desperado »

In post 2504, drealmerz7 wrote:aye, not liking the level of desp's lurksackness at all, but it is a large game with a bunch of
bozos
swell folks so it's hard to say for sure this early what his dealeo is

rm being a useless lurksack too

thought you meant this game
this post

right here

is you shading me

even tho you think scum can't have guns and i have a gun
;)
User avatar
Srceenplay
Srceenplay
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Srceenplay
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7419
Joined: November 29, 2016

Post Post #2751 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:07 am

Post by Srceenplay »

In post 2741, Srceenplay wrote:Who else hinted or claimed 3p.
Anyone remember so I don't have to dig through the massive thread.
"A man can not be too careful on the choices of his enemies." Oscar Wilde
User avatar
drealmerz7
drealmerz7
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
drealmerz7
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15374
Joined: February 9, 2016
Location: earth

Post Post #2752 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:08 am

Post by drealmerz7 »

that's not me shading you that's me calling you out for being a useless lurksack and saying I don't like it
balance among all things
User avatar
Desperado
Desperado
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Desperado
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12582
Joined: February 18, 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Post #2753 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:17 am

Post by Desperado »

In post 2752, drealmerz7 wrote:that's not me shading you that's me calling you out for being a useless lurksack and saying I don't like it
who cares what you like if i'm town tho?
;)
User avatar
Desperado
Desperado
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Desperado
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12582
Joined: February 18, 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Post #2754 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:17 am

Post by Desperado »

and that was hardly you calling me out, you equivocated immediately

it's the definition of shading
;)
User avatar
drealmerz7
drealmerz7
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
drealmerz7
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15374
Joined: February 9, 2016
Location: earth

Post Post #2755 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:23 am

Post by drealmerz7 »

In post 2753, Desperado wrote:
In post 2752, drealmerz7 wrote:that's not me shading you that's me calling you out for being a useless lurksack and saying I don't like it
who cares what you like if i'm town tho?
wtf?

townies should

I want you to play the game and contribute

I can not like that you're not
balance among all things
User avatar
Randomnamechange
Randomnamechange
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Randomnamechange
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6075
Joined: February 8, 2014

Post Post #2756 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:35 am

Post by Randomnamechange »

inb4 prod
vonflare (21:40)
you suck randomidget
User avatar
Randomnamechange
Randomnamechange
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Randomnamechange
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6075
Joined: February 8, 2014

Post Post #2757 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:44 am

Post by Randomnamechange »

p sure the arguments atm are tvt for the most part.
vonflare (21:40)
you suck randomidget
User avatar
drealmerz7
drealmerz7
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
drealmerz7
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15374
Joined: February 9, 2016
Location: earth

Post Post #2758 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:47 am

Post by drealmerz7 »

which arguments would those be, rm?
balance among all things
User avatar
Chickadee
Chickadee
Slightly Sketchy
User avatar
User avatar
Chickadee
Slightly Sketchy
Slightly Sketchy
Posts: 3900
Joined: June 13, 2011

Post Post #2759 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:22 am

Post by Chickadee »

In post 2758, drealmerz7 wrote:which arguments would those be, rm?
YOU AND EDDIE


I THOUGHT TVT AS WELL
Instagram: BoneSpellArts

"Yo I'm so good at anime girls" - pj
User avatar
Randomnamechange
Randomnamechange
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Randomnamechange
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6075
Joined: February 8, 2014

Post Post #2760 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:36 am

Post by Randomnamechange »

^ that, chess etc
vonflare (21:40)
you suck randomidget
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2761 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:41 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2696, Vecna wrote:Youre assuming everyone used that same logic? Not bloody likely
Of course not everyone is. But everyone fucking SHOULD be, unless they care to present a counterargument to my reasoning here.
User avatar
Vecna
Vecna
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Vecna
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11118
Joined: June 15, 2016
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #2762 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:51 am

Post by Vecna »

Given how everyone suddenly jumped on Dunker: Snarky = scum
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2763 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:52 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2705, Chickadee wrote:AND MASTINA WHY WOULD A PROTECTIVE ROLE CLAIM TO JAVE SAVED SOMEONE WHEN THERE WERE TWO KILLS ALREADY
Because.
In post 2705, Chickadee wrote:BULB CLAIMED TO KILL MULCH WITH A VIG SHOT.
Literally answered your own question. :P

Bulbazak shot Mulch.
There is one unaccounted for kill: Vaxkiller. If we assume that the Vaxkiller kill is the scum's nightkill, then there is a nightkill missing...thus, warranting a claim from them. No such claim has come forward.

I will not assume the presence of a nightkill off of a hypothetical which can be easily proven/disproven with claims. With no missing kill, there would be only one source of kills unaccounted for. Thus. Only one killer. Not a serial killer. Groupscum. Basically, it's a fundamental violation of occam's razor. Lynching SnarkySnowman is lynching a player off of the ASSUMPTION the 3p cop check is correct...and the ASSUMPTION that SnarkySnowman is a serial killer...and the ASSUMPTION that either SnarkySnowman's kill or the mafia's kill failed for whatever reason...off of the ASSUMPTION of something in play preventing the extra deaths. It's a lot of fucking assumptions.

Whereas he's an idea. SnarkySnowman is a 3p with a correct cop check, and not a serial killer. This fits the evidence without requiring large assumptions. SnarkySnowman as a different alignment with the 3p cop check being wrong does require one, but it's not impossible either, yet this is largely irrelevant to the point.

Furthermore. Let's say you do think SnarkySnowman is a serial killer. (In which case lol. You think a sk-Snarky is actually a threat to the town?) Still not fucking groupscum. So still lynching non-town rather than lynching mafia. And lynching mafia is my first and foremost priority. SnarkySnowman is about as conclusively as we can get, proven to not be groupscum. He is therefore the last person we should be fucking lynching.
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2764 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:54 am

Post by mastina »

Also.
In post 2705, Chickadee wrote:IVE HAD A SCUM READ ON MASTINA FOR A WHILE NOW BUT WE CAN DIG INTO IT TOMORROW
Have fun trying to lynch a masonizer.

I'll try to find a town player to use it on. Because if I succeed...good luck trying to lynch masons.
User avatar
chesskid3
chesskid3
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
chesskid3
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14658
Joined: August 9, 2010
Location: New Yawk

Post Post #2765 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:55 am

Post by chesskid3 »

Snarky can't be the SK mario is
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2766 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:01 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2731, Srceenplay wrote:I think I killed vax. My ability isn't very clear. Tonight I'm going to target either dunk or snarky and we will see what happens.
Okay, so.
This, if true.
Confirms we'd have a missing kill, yes?

Well for SnarkySnowman to be a serial killer, instead of ONE missing kill, now you've got to search for TWO missing kills.

With each missing kill you assume to exist, the likelihood of your assumption being accurate goes down.
This is frankly one of the strongest reasons why I have doubted multiball in spite of scumreading virtually everyone. (Along-side the Zoe/Zelda distribution meaning scum are likely all or mostly all Zeldas.) It requires assuming an extra missing kill.

But dammit. I can usually sense "bussing scum" in games. And I don't sense bussing-scum in this game. I can usually sense multiball in games. And I sense multiball in this game. Even though all the evidence rationally points to this not being the case so no matter what my emotions might say I will trust in logic and reasoning in spite of this game being the antithesis of those and believe in the facts, which suggest no multiball.

Btw if multiball were proven, then two scum + sk then requires even MORE extra missing kills. Which would again be evidence for SnarkySnowman to not be scum, so.
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2767 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:04 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2738, Chickadee wrote:
In post 2706, Srceenplay wrote:Can you quote it?
This might be just a 3p game.
In post 2712, Srceenplay wrote:All 3p
Shit ton of vigs
Not sane cop
That equals a game were Town kills themselves and 3p just trying to survive to the end.
EXPLAIN MORE THEN
While the idea you're pushing of a 3p slip holds at least some merit...we've had multiple town flips already. Honestly if anything I'd think you thinking it's a 3p slip would be closer to being a legit 3p slip.
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2768 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:04 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2748, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 2648, Dunkerdoodles wrote:i was jester gg guys
VOTE: dunkerdoodlesthe ss vote was bad i guess for the reasoning i gave although i wouldnt mind that lynch generally
This is still scummmmm
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2769 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:08 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2762, Vecna wrote:Given how everyone suddenly jumped on Dunker: Snarky = scum
This contradicts your own result. It's also rats-ass backwards.

Scum have a STRONG incentive to eliminate 3p players that contain any element which could pose a threat to them. By which, I am of course saying: any scum player who believes SnarkySnowman to be a serial killer fears SnarkySnowman using that nightkill on a player the scum really don't want dead. (Most likely, a scum player, but also possible: a player they're grooming; a player they were going to mislynch. Either is sub-optimal.)

That's why the SnarkySnowman wagon is so abysmally bad.
User avatar
drealmerz7
drealmerz7
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
drealmerz7
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15374
Joined: February 9, 2016
Location: earth

Post Post #2770 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:15 am

Post by drealmerz7 »

In post 2762, Vecna wrote:Given how everyone suddenly jumped on Dunker: Snarky = scum
ppl didn't suddenly jump on dunker
balance among all things
User avatar
drealmerz7
drealmerz7
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
drealmerz7
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15374
Joined: February 9, 2016
Location: earth

Post Post #2771 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:17 am

Post by drealmerz7 »

it looks like it is necessary to remind some of you that Mulch was bodyguard and there is a possibly of a double-tap kill
balance among all things
User avatar
drealmerz7
drealmerz7
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
drealmerz7
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15374
Joined: February 9, 2016
Location: earth

Post Post #2772 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:21 am

Post by drealmerz7 »

In post 2766, mastina wrote: Btw if multiball were proven, then two scum + sk then requires even MORE extra missing kills.
or the 2 teams get altering Nights enabled to kill
or 1 of the teams is a poison killing team and their kill hasn't "finished"

or vecna's BP absorbed

or or or
balance among all things
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2773 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:21 am

Post by mastina »

In post 2619, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: SnarkySnowman
the game has stagnated and 3p cop seems like its weird enough w/o a modifier. even if vecna is scum i believe the claim.
In post 2620, Llamarble wrote:Alright. We might have to be really sharp from here on though.
VOTE: snarky (both votes)
In post 2626, Dunkerdoodles wrote:VOTE: snarky
i guess we should trust a red
In post 2675, EddieFenix wrote:
2x Vote SnarkySnowman
These players hopped onto SnarkySnowman post-claim.

IF DUNKERDOODLES IS SCUM: I would look more into these names for being scum.
IF DUNKERDOODLES IS TOWN: I would still look more into these names for being scum, but instead I would tier them according to their Zoe/Zelda status and their guesses.

At top scum tier:
Llamarble
/EddieFenix, as Zeldas who guessed Zelda. Llamarble gets bonus points for voting Zoes to be lynched.
At second scum tier: MarioManiac4, as a Zoe who guessed Zoe and yet also voted Zoe. If any scum outside of Dunkerdoodles are likely to be in the Zoes, it's him. (Chickadee/dreal containing scum is possible, but not probable anymore to me.)

Most scum candidates remain to be Zeldas tho: Any of ActionDan/Vecna/randomidget/chesskid/Desperado/Screenplay
could
be scum, though I think some are more/less likely than others. Vecna's less likely; Screenplay's less likely; randomidget isn't less likely per se but he's a lower priority.
User avatar
mastina
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
User avatar
User avatar
mastina
She/Her
False Prophet
False Prophet
Posts: 16670
Joined: October 7, 2016
Pronoun: She/Her
Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA

Post Post #2774 (ISO) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:27 am

Post by mastina »

IF DUNKERDOODLES IS SCUM:
SnarkySnowman
Vecna
Desperado
ActionDan
drealmerz
randomidget
Screenplay
Chickadee
chesskid
EddieFenix
MarioManiac4
Llamarble

IF DUNKERDOODLES IS TOWN:
SnarkySnowman
Vecna
Screenplay
drealmerz
Chickadee
randomidget
MarioManiac4
chesskid
Desperado
ActionDan
EddieFenix
Llamarble

Approximately. Not very good I know but I'm working off of limited info.

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”