Anyway, is there anything in particular that anyone would like to draw my attention to?
In one game, my point about Cabd's making a point of not voting may hold. Of course, if they are known to do this in every game, it can be regarded as completely NAI. I will, however, analyse Cabd some more.
"one of these days i'll read you correctly" - Transcend, Micro 714
In post 50, Cabd wrote:The setup isn't anything too complex, I will note we will NOT get flips night one; and no-lynching in this setup is almost always the wrong move.
The two "self-docs" here should be treated somewhat like you would bulletproofs in the matrix 6 setup, with the note that them claiming early like the matrix 6 BP strat is a bad idea.
Can anyone else see it here? I'm being vague intentionally.
As town I would have expected you to have a different reaction. I'll confess I don't base anything on meta so there is a chance I'm wrong, which you'll get to refute when I point it out what it is I see. Hint: it's not the setup error.
Anyway, is there anything in particular that anyone would like to draw my attention to?
In one game, my point about Cabd's making a point of not voting may hold. Of course, if they are known to do this in every game, it can be regarded as completely NAI. I will, however, analyse Cabd some more.
Not voting is an every game thing.
However; there is plenty of game data out there for me. Modern games aren't included yet but my wiki may prove helpful.
Currently in COVID hell, population: Entire Household
In post 50, Cabd wrote:The setup isn't anything too complex, I will note we will NOT get flips night one; and no-lynching in this setup is almost always the wrong move.
This is what we're analyzing?
Everything before the semicolon is just fact, and everything after the semicolon is fact for anyone who is town. I guess you must be picking out the word "almost" and trying to argue that that its a scum slip because the only reason to use that qualifier is if your alignment is scum.
...I must be missing it still cause that'd be a weak thing to argue as a scum slip
In post 50, Cabd wrote:The setup isn't anything too complex, I will note we will NOT get flips night one; and no-lynching in this setup is almost always the wrong move.
The two "self-docs" here
should be treated somewhat like you
would bulletproofs in the matrix 6 setup, with the note that them claiming early like the matrix 6 BP strat is a bad idea.
is it that the voicing here indicates scum pov somehow?
As in, I didn't really read the setup; sorta skimmed and then made that post. That's where the "2" came from and why it's not related to my entrance into the game, but more the replacement itself.
Currently in COVID hell, population: Entire Household
In post 50, Cabd wrote:The setup isn't anything too complex,
I will note we will NOT get flips night one;
and no-lynching in this setup is almost always the wrong move.
The two "self-docs" here should be treated somewhat like you would bulletproofs in the matrix 6 setup, with the note that them claiming early like the matrix 6 BP strat is a bad idea.
Ok so the bold is what pings me. We know, and Cabd has admitted, that he rushed in and didn't read the setup. If he were vanilla town he would have received the role PM which gives us the "lingering spirit" ability. He would not know that scum cannot whisper and kill the same night if he did not receive the scum role PM. His mistake with the two-self docs initially alerted me to the fact he hadn't read the set-up, so one can assume that he's only read his role PM and that is the information he's basing this post on.
