Mini Normal 1952: Dragon's Dance [OVER - PERFECT SCUM WIN]

[Tchill13]

Also EP why is your town read on me stagnating? I'm pretty sure that's how you worded it.

[Tchill13]

One thing that has given me a bit of pause on Mumble is he reacted somewhat similar to this in a heated discussion with scum in a game that just ended recently. Boon you remember right?

Uzi could you make the case for town mumbles to all of us instead of just boon?

[Tchill13]

Okay, yeah, my opinion hasn't really changed. Mumble doesn't really engage with LQ much at all, aside from a couple of comments about playstyle and strategy; Mumble is notably absent from LQ's readslist in 64, and LQ doesn't even really address Mumble until much later on. Instead he spends a lot of time disagreeing with my points on Mumble without ever really even mentioning him until after post 300, which is weird to me. I'm still not sold on the idea that this isn't distancing. I will need to really wait until one of them (whoever gets lynched D1) flips before I can really make much of this association.

Lalendra are you stating you think mumble,LQ,havo could be the scum team?

[Tchill13]

What's odd is the fact that ppl decided to shift the focus to havo instead of Schadd.

[Tchill13]

I'm down to Lynch mumbles, LQ, schadd and acid. In order from most wanted Lynch to least but I'd still be happy with.

[Mumble]

I'm scum reading him because he voted havo at the mention of it.

Why do you keep ignoring/lying? I addressed this at first mention.

[Tchill13]

VOTE: havo

lmao i thought the mumble wagon was lame because lynching lurkers on day 1 doesn't really give any info because nobody has to really take a hard stance there and its kinda just "lets lynch him just to lynch him."

then he voted havo. smh. mumble got a little attention then votes the next guy that gets brought up.

Who said he wanted to quick lynch me after scum reading me based on one game, and then attacks someone for scum reading me..............

Like uber ..........

OK I'll ask it again. Is this your explanation?

[Mumble]

Mumble needs to get on here and explain why my case istterrible on him instead of just yelling scum.

I did, quite a few days ago. I yell scum because you are, for whatever reason, ignoring it. And, even if it was true, is horrible on face value.

[Mumble]

Yes.

[Mumble]

As I've said....

[Tchill13]

Who did he attack for scum reading you?

[Mumble]

I still think I should be the lynch though. There's at least one scum trying to protect/town read me. Not sure who.

[Mumble]

acid.

[Tchill13]

VOTE: havo

lmao i thought the mumble wagon was lame because lynching lurkers on day 1 doesn't really give any info because nobody has to really take a hard stance there and its kinda just "lets lynch him just to lynch him."

then he voted havo. smh. mumble got a little attention then votes the next guy that gets brought up.

Who said he wanted to quick lynch me after scum reading me based on one game, and then attacks someone for scum reading me..............

Like uber ..........

Who did I attack for scum reading you?

Are you referring to me "Asking" Acid a question? You know, where he had his vote on TSQ, then TSQ joined the thread and instead of pushing on TSQ, he asked him who he'd like to vote, then he started pushing you. I found it odd that he didn't push TSQ, since his vote was there and brought it up.
That's not attacking Mumble. What LQ did to me, now that's ATTACKING.

This isn't an accurate point to you? This seems like a legitimate question.

[Tchill13]

Literally one mention of acid in havos iso. That is NOT an attack.

[Mumble]

It alleviated one of my two points. One reason why he's slowly progressed up the ranks of my readlist until - if you'll go back and look - I don't scum read him any more.

That's not a good point though. You are calling me scum for my vote on Havo, stating it happened because it was there. My vote on Havo had a reason; was prior to that the explanation you've posted above; and, was based on what I had stated. You are either calling me a liar at that point, or are ignorant to the circumstance in which the vote happened. Your choice. One makes you scum. One makes you ignorant town. With the fervor of your push/ignoring, I lean the former.

[Tchill13]

Ignoring and disagreeing are 2 different things. Had you not explained it was specifically acid I never would have figured that out because the only thing close to an attack havo did was against LQ. You need to shake off your "I'm screwed" attitude and clear things up if you're town. Confusion doesn't do anything but help scum.

[Tchill13]

You're vote on havo is a stretch and very weak and you're still scum.

[Mumble]

And so are you.

You're still voting me, right?

[Mumble]

Had you not explained it was specifically acid I never would have figured that out because the only thing close to an attack havo did was against LQ

Also, this is bullshit, because you pulled the exact quote from Havo that explained what I thought the attack was.

Nice try.

[Tchill13]

AFTER YOU CLEARED UP THE FACT IT WAS ACID. Iso havo and tell me how many times hementiones acid.

[Tchill13]

And so are you.

You're still voting me, right?

"hey man you're scum As long as you're voting me. Just letting everyone know I'm OMGUSING you."

[Mumble]

Within a minute...Lots of research you had to do there guy.

[Mumble]

I don't think you understand the meaning of the term.

[Tchill13]

So havo asked acid a question and mumble voted him. Havo mentioned a wagon on LQ and LQ voted him. All the other votes on havo have been naked I'm pretty sure. Nice looking push we got going here.