Mini Normal 1950 [Engame: Mafia Victory!]

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:52 am

Yeah so it's kinda NAI right? His overall contribution this day is too...but I'm sure scum would've cared more? I know it's dumb but Morality and Wave bandwagoning put me off... I feel like UnaH is scum but something isn't right. I need to do some VCA.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:53 am

In post 950, CheekyTeeky wrote:Yeah so it's kinda NAI right? His overall contribution this day is too...but I'm sure scum would've cared more? I know it's dumb but Morality and Wave bandwagoning put me off... I feel like UnaH is scum but something isn't right. I need to do some VCA.

Sorry should say his contribution is scummy too**

necro · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:57 am

Vote Chip for euphoric feeling of day1 scum flip.

Chip Butty · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:07 am

In post 949, Rhah wrote:Lackluster tbh.

What would a non-lacklustre VT claim look like?

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:12 am

Chip why did you vote UnaH?

VOTE: Chip Butty

Chip Butty · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:24 am

In post 954, CheekyTeeky wrote:Chip why did you vote UnaH?

VOTE: Chip Butty

It's in thread already. I had been pushing to wagon an inactive because we weren't getting anywhere, and UnaH was the one that happened.

Chip Butty · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:27 am

Personally i think it might be time to press for a ne ro claim. I don't think he can be a PR with his attention-seeking playstyle. Can you get behind that?

Chip Butty · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:27 am

^necro

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:33 am

Eh VOTE: UnaH I can't be bothered starting again lol. Might as well push my gut.

Chip Butty · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:41 am

In post 958, CheekyTeeky wrote:Eh VOTE: UnaH I can't be bothered starting again lol. Might as well push my gut.

That's interesting. Are you sure I can't interest you in a necro wagon?

Vanderscamp · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:28 am

In post 928, Porkens wrote:Welcome to my circle of trust.

Is there anything I did to get added to your circle of trust?

Vanderscamp · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:32 am

In post 950, CheekyTeeky wrote:Yeah so it's kinda NAI right? His overall contribution this day is too...but I'm sure scum would've cared more? I know it's dumb but Morality and Wave bandwagoning put me off... I feel like UnaH is scum but something isn't right. I need to do some VCA.

Do you feel like he's scum of do you believe his claim?

Vanderscamp · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:34 am

In post 956, Chip Butty wrote:Personally i think it might be time to press for a ne ro claim. I don't think he can be a PR with his attention-seeking playstyle. Can you get behind that?

vote chip butty

This is extremely nonsensical.
If you're asking him to claim, and then in the same post saying that there's only one thing you're expecting him to claim, wtf are you hoping to achieve?
That you're wrong and he's a PR?

Porkens · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:40 am

I think chip would be a bad lynch.

Necro is a really good idea for lynch.

Circle of trust is just a feeling. I get clear vibrations from those in it.

Chip Butty · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:45 am

In post 962, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 956, Chip Butty wrote:Personally i think it might be time to press for a ne ro claim. I don't think he can be a PR with his attention-seeking playstyle. Can you get behind that?

vote chip butty

This is extremely nonsensical.
If you're asking him to claim, and then in the same post saying that there's only one thing you're expecting him to claim, wtf are you hoping to achieve?
That you're wrong and he's a PR?

There seems to be a lot of resistance to a necro wagon. Interesting. My suggestion seems to be yielding informational fruit already. Obviously taking necro to L-1 stands to gain the same benefits as taking CT or UnaH to L-1.

Porkens · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:46 am

vote: necro

Rhah · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:02 am

956 is one of the wonkiest posts I've ever seen.

Chip Butty · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:14 am

In post 713, Rhah wrote:VOTE: Chip Butty

In post 714, Rhah wrote:This or Una

Go

In post 966, Rhah wrote:956 is one of the wonkiest posts I've ever seen.

Actually those two were about the wonkiest in the game so far. Decided that it's safe to take another shot at me, have we, brah?

Chip Butty · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:18 am

A VC would be nice at some point.

Rhah · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:23 am

We could have flipped you 8 years ago if I thought necro was telling the truth. I don't know who wouldn't feel safe taking a shot at you.

Porkens · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:27 am

Rah you think necro is lying?

UnaBombaH · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:35 am

In post 958, CheekyTeeky wrote:Eh VOTE: UnaH I can't be bothered starting again lol. Might as well push my gut.

This raised some red flags again..

WHY do you care SO much what Rhah thinks of you/your reads??
This notion I've been having about you two being linked got way stronger again - I think I need to re-read your ISOs together.

Either scumtheater or one pocketing the hell out of the other.
I feel like I can solve at least one scum D2 if we don't get one today, Boon probably already know at least one scum if he gets the time to interact..

Chip Butty · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:55 am

https://youtu.be/kvDMlk3kSYg

Rhah Rhah Rhasputin, poster for the necro team
There was a cat that really was gone
Rhah Rhah Rhasputin, necro's greatest post machine
It was a shame how he carried on

But when his posting and voting and hunger to NK became known to more and more people, the demands to do something about this outrageous man became louder and louder.

Porkens · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:23 am

Part 1. "RVS": A knot of votes centers around CheekyTeeky.

Spoiler:

Part 2. The Cheeky wagon collapses, and many jump to UC Voyager. (Note Cheeky's vote at the end)

Spoiler:

Part 3. Support for lynching Voyager wanes, Necro jumps on his third wagon.

Spoiler:

In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.

VOTE: Rhah

-----

Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.

In post 113, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 112, Rhah wrote:
In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.

VOTE: Rhah

-----

Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.
I would like for you to tell me to tell me what is not true. Your first post is a naked vote and then you proceed to... talk about peeks. In what way is my observation dishonest? Also, this being the second thing you decide to post in the game thread strikes me a certain way. It's not a good feeling. Nevermind that you actually accompany your post with a vote on me.
I misread peeks as a shorthand for Cheeky.

UNVOTE: Rhah

Alright, now that I can actually read what you're saying, let's try this dialogue again. Why would you find it interesting that I only talked about setup strategy with my first post given that the only other things posted were greetings and random votes?

In post 117, UnaBombaH wrote:Oh man, I pretty much missed the RVS..

On the other hand, I got to read some more when starting, and I have currently no trouble going for a VOTE: UC Voyager.

We do not need this in late game anyway, based on the things I have seen so far.

One of
UC Voyager, Zulfy, Rhah
is scum to me, interested in seeing their respective progressions.

I'm not familiar with hypo-claimings (know a few scenarios, haven't been a part of one yet), but how would we do it in this game, and what good could it possibly do?
Not sure if I misunderstood something about it.

In post 123, wavemode wrote:That said, leaning town on UC, necro, Chip Butty atm

UNVOTE:

In post 127, UC Voyager wrote:
In post 126, Rhah wrote:
In post 113, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 112, Rhah wrote:
In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.

VOTE: Rhah

-----

Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.
I would like for you to tell me to tell me what is not true. Your first post is a naked vote and then you proceed to... talk about peeks. In what way is my observation dishonest? Also, this being the second thing you decide to post in the game thread strikes me a certain way. It's not a good feeling. Nevermind that you actually accompany your post with a vote on me.
I misread peeks as a shorthand for Cheeky.

UNVOTE: Rhah

Alright, now that I can actually read what you're saying, let's try this dialogue again. Why would you find it interesting that I only talked about setup strategy with my first post given that the only other things posted were greetings and random votes?
I think you chose to consciously emphasize the strategy. It just reminded me of how mafia will attempt to "solve" in RVS. I doubt that this is indicative of your alignment though.

In post 116, Zulfy wrote:What are peeks?
I'm used to (hypo) cop claims being referred to as peeks, I can't say it's something I do a lot.

In post 117, UnaBombaH wrote:Oh man, I pretty much missed the RVS..

On the other hand, I got to read some more when starting, and I have currently no trouble going for a VOTE: UC Voyager.

We do not need this in late game anyway, based on the things I have seen so far.

One of
UC Voyager, Zulfy, Rhah
is scum to me, interested in seeing their respective progressions.
So are you policy lynching UC? Cause that's what it looks like. Also, neat pool. How did you get there?
whoa. chill out there. im only at three votes. lol. and this just started yesterday, so i mean. a little early to be saying that....UNVOTE:
taken the vote off rhah for now

In post 153, UC Voyager wrote:VOTE: Rhah

biggest scum read

In post 158, necro wrote:VOTE: Rhah

Wagons are fun!!!

In post 171, Rhah wrote:Soliciting voters. Uncle Rhah needs you.

VOTE: necro

Morality · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:34 am

In post 950, CheekyTeeky wrote:Yeah so it's kinda NAI right? His overall contribution this day is too...but I'm sure scum would've cared more? I know it's dumb but Morality and Wave bandwagoning put me off... I feel like UnaH is scum but something isn't right. I need to do some VCA.

What do you mean Wave and I are bandwagoning? He’s not pushing for Vander with me, is he?