Mini Normal 1950 [Engame: Mafia Victory!]

Chip Butty · Post Post #1000 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:22 pm

In post 943, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 909, Porkens wrote:Bascialy from the begining of day 1 you have had a weird vibe with necro. Either he was trying to sheep you and then decided to bus you or push you.

Then the RVS wagon fall apart and landed mostly on you, including necro. Cheecky and Rah came off as most supportive of stringing you up. At that point you seemed like an easier mislynch. I was scumreading you at the time that push started I think.

Ok so Wavemode kinda POEs down into the scumteam if you are scum, but I actually think the UC TOWN universe is more likely.
Why is UCV likely town?

In post 944, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 910, Porkens wrote:
In post 908, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 906, Porkens wrote:I skmmed, this is my gutread.
Why does it all hinge on UCV?
she seems central to the plot of the first half of day 1.
How so?

No response to these, despite several subsequent posts by Porkens.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1001 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:25 pm

Where's sheepsaysmeep? He's been gone almost two days...

Porkens · Post Post #1002 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:31 pm

In post 973, Porkens wrote:Part 1. "RVS": A knot of votes centers around CheekyTeeky.

Spoiler:
In post 6, UC Voyager wrote:VOTE: CheekyTeeky hey....what is up

My role is....

Jk! I'm not telling you!!!! XD
I'm not that much of a noob

In post 7, ChaosOmega wrote:VOTE: CheekyTeeky

What are everyone's thoughts on hypo-vanilla cop claiming?

On day 2 and onwards (until the vanilla cop role is claimed or killed), every player posts a result as if they were the vanilla cop; the actual vanilla cop tells the truth and everyone else makes up a result. It does possibly give scum more info on who isn't the vanilla cop (if someone claims an incorrect result on one of them, for example), but it guarantees that we have all of the investigations as public knowledge while allowing them not to claim and draw a NK.

In post 8, Zulfy wrote:VOTE: CheekyTeeky

I'm busy right now be back later

In post 11, wavemode wrote:
In post 10, UC Voyager wrote:so........how is all this RVS......
I suppose the randomness is a bit like this

VOTE: CheekyTeeky

In post 13, acidphoenix wrote:you guys raise a good point

UNVOTE: VOTE: cheekyteeky

In post 16, UC Voyager wrote:UNVOTE: :

before this gets out of hand. lol

In post 18, necro wrote:I think UC Voyager is likely town.

VOTE: Luca Blight
Highlander scum.

In post 20, Rhah wrote:Hey.

VOTE: UC Voyager

In post 21, UC Voyager wrote:
In post 20, Rhah wrote:Hey.

VOTE: UC Voyager
sup

VOTE: Rhah

In post 22, Chip Butty wrote:VOTE: Zulfy

Happy scumday, scum.

In post 26, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Everyone rabid OMGUS

Part 2. The Cheeky wagon collapses, and many jump to UC Voyager. (Note Cheeky's vote at the end)

Spoiler:
In post 39, Zulfy wrote:VOTE: UC Voyager

In post 41, acidphoenix wrote:VOTE: rhar

you all suck for no l-1

lgi

In post 47, Luca Blight wrote:VOTE: Zulfy

[insert joke here]
In post 66, wavemode wrote:
In post 33, UC Voyager wrote:is he new??????
you dont make reads unless you have something to back it up with.....
and you have townie below your name......probably should have started with a newbie game
VOTE: UC Voyager

In post 67, Morality wrote:
In post 31, Zulfy wrote:Don't make reads you're not gonna explain.
Why would someone be able to explain it right now? Looks like you’re saying stuff for the sake of saying it.

VOTE: Zulfy
In post 92, necro wrote:VOTE: UC Voyager

Easy game.
In post 100, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Vanderscamp

Part 3. Support for lynching Voyager wanes, Necro jumps on his third wagon.

Spoiler:
In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.

VOTE: Rhah

-----

Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.

In post 113, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 112, Rhah wrote:
In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.

VOTE: Rhah

-----

Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.
I would like for you to tell me to tell me what is not true. Your first post is a naked vote and then you proceed to... talk about peeks. In what way is my observation dishonest? Also, this being the second thing you decide to post in the game thread strikes me a certain way. It's not a good feeling. Nevermind that you actually accompany your post with a vote on me.
I misread peeks as a shorthand for Cheeky.

UNVOTE: Rhah

Alright, now that I can actually read what you're saying, let's try this dialogue again. Why would you find it interesting that I only talked about setup strategy with my first post given that the only other things posted were greetings and random votes?

In post 117, UnaBombaH wrote:Oh man, I pretty much missed the RVS..

On the other hand, I got to read some more when starting, and I have currently no trouble going for a VOTE: UC Voyager.

We do not need this in late game anyway, based on the things I have seen so far.

One of
UC Voyager, Zulfy, Rhah
is scum to me, interested in seeing their respective progressions.

I'm not familiar with hypo-claimings (know a few scenarios, haven't been a part of one yet), but how would we do it in this game, and what good could it possibly do?
Not sure if I misunderstood something about it.

In post 123, wavemode wrote:That said, leaning town on UC, necro, Chip Butty atm

UNVOTE:
In post 127, UC Voyager wrote:
In post 126, Rhah wrote:
In post 113, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 112, Rhah wrote:
In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.

VOTE: Rhah

-----

Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.
I would like for you to tell me to tell me what is not true. Your first post is a naked vote and then you proceed to... talk about peeks. In what way is my observation dishonest? Also, this being the second thing you decide to post in the game thread strikes me a certain way. It's not a good feeling. Nevermind that you actually accompany your post with a vote on me.
I misread peeks as a shorthand for Cheeky.

UNVOTE: Rhah

Alright, now that I can actually read what you're saying, let's try this dialogue again. Why would you find it interesting that I only talked about setup strategy with my first post given that the only other things posted were greetings and random votes?
I think you chose to consciously emphasize the strategy. It just reminded me of how mafia will attempt to "solve" in RVS. I doubt that this is indicative of your alignment though.

In post 116, Zulfy wrote:What are peeks?
I'm used to (hypo) cop claims being referred to as peeks, I can't say it's something I do a lot.

In post 117, UnaBombaH wrote:Oh man, I pretty much missed the RVS..

On the other hand, I got to read some more when starting, and I have currently no trouble going for a VOTE: UC Voyager.

We do not need this in late game anyway, based on the things I have seen so far.

One of
UC Voyager, Zulfy, Rhah
is scum to me, interested in seeing their respective progressions.
So are you policy lynching UC? Cause that's what it looks like. Also, neat pool. How did you get there?
whoa. chill out there. im only at three votes. lol. and this just started yesterday, so i mean. a little early to be saying that....UNVOTE:
taken the vote off rhah for now
In post 153, UC Voyager wrote:VOTE: Rhah

biggest scum read

In post 158, necro wrote:VOTE: Rhah

Wagons are fun!!!

In post 171, Rhah wrote:Soliciting voters. Uncle Rhah needs you.

VOTE: necro

Chip Butty · Post Post #1003 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:32 pm

In post 963, Porkens wrote:I think chip would be a bad lynch.

Necro is a really good idea for lynch.

Circle of trust is just a feeling. I get clear vibrations from those in it.

I've got the same problem with Porkens as i have with necro - a lot of talk about gut-feeling and intuition etc but little or no actual reasons. He's given me an unconditional green read without reasons, which suggests a pocketing attempt.

With all this and just 16 hours on the clock, I think our best bet is to lynch bacon.

VOTE: Porkens

Porkens · Post Post #1004 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:33 pm

vote: unibomber

Porkens · Post Post #1005 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:34 pm

Necro has been in the game since day 1.

Porkens · Post Post #1006 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:35 pm

I've given you everything you've asked for. You have nothing to say about unibomber. I guess i was wrong about you.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1007 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:36 pm

@Porkens: okay sometimes you give reasons bu as someone pointed out, at other times you insist your reads are based on gut. Which is it? It just looks like you're making shit up as you go along.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1008 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:39 pm

In post 995, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 991, Flairs wrote:
Vote Count 1.15

UnaBombaH (4): wavemode, Rhah, Chip Butty, CheekyTeeky
Porkens (3): sheepsaysmeep, UC Voyager, UnaBombaH
Chip Butty (3): acidphoenix, necro, Vanderscamp
Rhah (1): Zulfy
Vanderscamp (1): Morality
CheekyTeeky (1): Porkens

Not voting (0):

With 13 alive, it will take 7 to lynch.

Day 1's deadline is Tuesday, October 17, @ 3 PM EST (expired on 2017-10-17 15:00:00).
Okay, we have 17 hours, so forget necro for today. I'm up for it d2 though.

I'm going to re-ISO UnaH and ChaosOmega-Porkens.

In post 1006, Porkens wrote:I've given you everything you've asked for. You have nothing to say about unibomber. I guess i was wrong about you.

I was voting UnaH before voting you? Also i do talk about him in 990.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1009 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:43 pm

In post 1005, Porkens wrote:Necro has been in the game since day 1.

Um...what day do you think it is now?

Porkens · Post Post #1010 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:44 pm

In post 1007, Chip Butty wrote:@Porkens: okay sometimes you give reasons bu as someone pointed out, at other times you insist your reads are based on gut. Which is it? It just looks like you're making shit up as you go along.

I am.

Porkens · Post Post #1011 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:44 pm

In post 1009, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1005, Porkens wrote:Necro has been in the game since day 1.
Um...what day do you think it is now?

Page 1 I guess

UC Voyager · Post Post #1012 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:48 pm

In post 991, Flairs wrote:
Vote Count 1.15

UnaBombaH (4): wavemode, Rhah, Chip Butty, CheekyTeeky
Porkens (3): sheepsaysmeep, UC Voyager, UnaBombaH
Chip Butty (3): acidphoenix, necro, Vanderscamp
Rhah (1): Zulfy
Vanderscamp (1): Morality
CheekyTeeky (1): Porkens

Not voting (0):

With 13 alive, it will take 7 to lynch.

Day 1's deadline is Tuesday, October 17, @ 3 PM EST (expired on 2017-10-17 15:00:00).

I didn't realise Sheepsaysmeep had voted for Pickens....where is he anyway. He hasn't posted recently

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1013 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:58 pm

Is porkens at L-1?

Chip Butty · Post Post #1014 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:02 pm

In post 1013, CheekyTeeky wrote:Is porkens at L-1?

Yes you're right. I was about to post L-2 but luckily you ninja'd me.

Porkens · Post Post #1015 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:28 pm

I'm vanilla town.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1016 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:35 pm

So now the questions are:

1. Do we believe Porkens?

2. Is 15 hours enough to try another wagon?

UnaBombaH · Post Post #1017 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:57 pm

CLASSIC SITUATION: we have two VT-claims and a closing deadline..

I think Cheeky offering to be the lynch with 0 votes is weird.
Means she doesn't really think any of the current wagons flip scum?

G'night. VOTE: Porkens

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1018 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:01 pm

In post 1017, UnaBombaH wrote:CLASSIC SITUATION: we have two VT-claims and a closing deadline..

I think Cheeky offering to be the lynch with 0 votes is weird.
Means she doesn't really think any of the current wagons flip scum?

G'night. VOTE: Porkens

Wow way to twist another thing I say out of context. I was asking town who to lynch out of my scumspects, with the amount of indecision I said if you're looking for an info lynch, I'm a better option than UCV. UnaH just keeps proving he's scum to me.

You're already on the wagon so nice try.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1019 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:02 pm

VOTE: UnaH

Chip Butty · Post Post #1020 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:03 pm

In post 1018, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1017, UnaBombaH wrote:CLASSIC SITUATION: we have two VT-claims and a closing deadline..

I think Cheeky offering to be the lynch with 0 votes is weird.
Means she doesn't really think any of the current wagons flip scum?

G'night. VOTE: Porkens
Wow way to twist another thing I say out of context. I was asking town who to lynch out of my scumspects, with the amount of indecision I said if you're looking for an info lynch, I'm a better option than UCV. UnaH just keeps proving he's scum to me.

You're already on the wagon so nice try.

CT why did you point that out? We might have had Porkens confessing.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1021 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:04 pm

At least one scum in {UnaH, Chip}

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1022 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:04 pm

That's a weak as shit gambit.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1023 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 1022, CheekyTeeky wrote:That's a weak as shit gambit.

It wouldn't have hurt to let it run awhile. Why are you suddenly in hyper-OMGUS mode?

Also it's technically not so much a gambit as a ploy.

Porkens · Post Post #1024 (ISO) » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:08 pm

I confess that I wish I were a dayvig instead of vt because I'd shoot scrum right in the face. Good luck town.