You are correct about the lack of consensus, its just curious that you see it implies a town vs town over scum vs town. Do you think thats its fairly weak to individually read two players just because of their wagon composition? You are correct that easywagon that form itself d1 is more pften than not a town, but its not at all what happened especially concerning flub. Flub had like 4 votes along with rah’s (a conf clear) while quick had no votes and then the wagon formed pretty f quickly, thats not more two wagons forming and splitting up, its the basis of a counterwagon 2mill. After quick was voted, whisker’s wagon got killed and everyone voting there moved to quick, many people justified and some overjustified their votes and they all voted with their scumread whiskers. Basically if i remember correctly the people from whisk wagon were roughly the se on quick, not on flub. People like bee and nero who flipflopped between both has actual reasons (nero’s sucked tho) some didnt like gerry who hoped at the end.In post 2772, TwoInAMillion wrote:Be more specific. I think both are town because of the lack of reasoning on both lynches, the scumminess of people on their wagons, that they came up day 1 when there are many mislynches and the lack of consensus on lynches as if scum is trying to split up the town.In post 2771, Joey_ wrote:Why do you think both are town? You dont think the flub’s lynch resistance from yday was odd?In post 2770, TwoInAMillion wrote:Nothing changed my mind. I thought Quick was town before and he was town. There are scum on his wagon. There are scum on Whiskers and Flubbers wagons. Town is making it easy for scum to hide by pushing bad wagons.
If anything, thats is clear to me it felt like a town vs scum