Mini Normal 1954: Iambic Tetramafia: Endgame

[jjh927]

Votecount 2.03

They have to press on, anyway,
For who can know what comes at night?

Lil Uzi Vert	L-4	Jingle, Dunkerdoodles
Flubbernugget	L-5	EspeciallyTheLies
Taiho	L-5	Awoo
ironstove	L-5	Flubbernugget
Not Voting	---	Fykus, ironstove, skitter30, UC Voyager, Taiho, Lil Uzi Vert

The deadline is (expired on 2017-11-09 04:00:00) from now.

With 11 people alive, the lynch threshold is 6.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

VOTE: luv
choo choo

no... why?

jingle you flubber and ironstove are not fooling goddamn anyone.

this has to stop. miller is not a fucking normal role, it's fucking insane that you even brought it up. second, for someone who claimed to "know" there were masons at the start of the game, if you're actually town, you're being really fucking stupid and since i know you aren't really fucking stupid, you must be scum with the way you keep hard defending flubber.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

what POSSIBLE REASON COULD THE POSSIBLY BE for me to KNOW flubber is a lying sack of shit? hmmmmm???? think about it.

[skitter30]

him previously being hounded by Skitter on whether he’s loyal or not.

Where did this happen?

From 558 to like 575

Lot less than I remember

Yeah, cuz it didn't happen.

You can argue that I was hounding him over the variant role thing, cuz I wanted to know if we were in a direct-cc universe, cuz that would make our lives pretty easy. But I don't think you can characterize anything I said there as 'hounding him' over 'whether he's loyal or not'.

I assumed he’s a cop with a modifier based on 582 due to him previously being hounded by Skitter on whether he’s loyal or not.

I rather dislike that you're bolstering your explanation for why you thought he was a cop based on something that I didn't do.

I'm comfortable voting outside of the thorface bloc today

VOTE: ironstove do something with your vote

Out of everyone not in the thorface bloc, why'd you pick ironstove? I actually kinda like his most recent posts.

it seems we have 2 options: lynch within dunk and flubber
or lynch a third party.

obviously, if dunk and flub were both town the best thing for us to do is to lynch someone else. but if it turns out one of the two is scum then we just lost a pr for nothing.

Do you think Dunk and Flub are both town? Do you suggest lynching within Dunk/Flubber, or lynching a third party?

[EspeciallyTheLies]

what POSSIBLE reason could there POSSIBLY BE for dunker to continue to assume if flubber were town he must have a loyal modifier instead of anything else??? jesus fucking christ.


people. stop letting scum run you around and get your heads all mixed up with bad "logic" that doesn't make sense if you recognize that dunker is town.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

HELLO

[skitter30]

jingle you flubber and ironstove are not fooling goddamn anyone.

What happened to me?

[Fykus]

hmmm, i think im gonna side with luv and etl on this one.

VOTE: flubber

[EspeciallyTheLies]

jingle you flubber and ironstove are not fooling goddamn anyone.

What happened to me?

i don't think you have as high a chance of being partners with jingle/flubber as ironstove does, especially with his most recent posts that just scream of over-night coaching from buddies.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Skittles and dunkerdoodles are right

Enabler is also normal

There's an easier way to solve this. If jingle catches up on this and cc's me, we have a town for scum trade which is probably better than a potential clear anyway.

STOP STALLING. you claim a guilty on dunker with your vote but are too afraid to come out and actually say one way or the other.

YES. OR NO. DO YOU HAVE A GUILTY RESULT ON DUNKER?

i mean, it has LITERALLY BEEN

DAYS

of stalling to avoid answering a simple question. tell me what town player denies good information that would lead to a possible scum lynch if he actually had good information??? there is no scenario in which a town player fumbles and evades and skirts around an answer this much if a scum lynch is on the table. absolutely none. and you know why this is happening? because scumflubber chose the wrong person to fake a guilty on. he got caught. and now he has no idea what to do.

[skitter30]

hmmm, i think im gonna side with luv and etl on this one.

VOTE: flubber

Why on earth are you voting Flubber right now? I literally can't think of a reason why we shouldn't let night actions resolve him. If he isn't like dead tomorrow, we revisit this from that perspective.

i don't think you have as high a chance of being partners with jingle/flubber as ironstove does, especially with his most recent posts that just scream of over-night coaching from buddies.

which also means two of skitter, jingle and ironstove are the partners.

If anything, I think you can make an argument that I've been defending him, so I'm not sure why you're no longer considering me as a possible flubber partner.

And what does 'over-night' coaching mean? IRL overnight, or between day 1 and day 2?

Also, why do you think Flubber is voting partner!ironstove atm?

Since you're around, can you address 619 please?

[EspeciallyTheLies]

AND ANOTHER THING. D1 two claimed a pr. outright. but jingle didn't argue so hard to leave him alive did he? no. suddenly, we *have* to keep flubber alive when he won't even explain... ANYTHING? this is a HUGE contradiction to yesterday. why is anyone taking it at face value when there is someone TELLING YOU POINT BLANK HE IS LYING?

skitter that is a giant post and i'm mobile. i can't quote/edit it easily at the moment. give me bits and pieces one at a time or read my posts better.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

over night meaning over the night phase in the scum PT.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

skitter i already answered you in 683???? why are you asking the same question over and over? do you WANT me to scumread you? your posts don't warrant it. wtf else am i supposed to say here? i've answered you as plainly as i can.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

flubber voting ironstove is a bus obviously if they are partners. do you somehow think that never happens? i am positive on flubber. mostly sure about jingle. ironstove is likely but not solid. or i'd be voting one of them!

[EspeciallyTheLies]

flubber is trying to save his ass after getting caught. he doesn't want to push the dunker issue anymore because it failed miserably. all he can do is vote someone he thinks is reasonable enough to vote without getting too much attention but isn't very likely to get lynched today.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

i'm busy now. don't be dumb. lynch the caught scum flubber.

[UC Voyager]

VOTE: flubber
I agree with ETL...I have had a slight scum read on clubber and he is just expanding the case...

[Flubbernugget]

ETL

What do you think is going to change tomorrow that you won't be able to lynch me then?

[Flubbernugget]

Are you really saying a neighborizor and an investigation role should be treated the same way?

[Flubbernugget]

There is nothing explicitly non-normal or bastard about me finding a property of dunkerdoodles's role.

Dunk. Please think about the one property of your role that is shared with scum.

ETL, do you have a similar town read on LUV that you do to Dunkerdoodles?

[EspeciallyTheLies]

There is nothing explicitly non-normal or bastard about me finding a property of dunkerdoodles's role.

Dunk. Please think about the one property of your role that is shared with scum.

ETL, do you have a similar town read on LUV that you do to Dunkerdoodles?

OMFG YOU ARE DUMB.

UNVOTE:

[EspeciallyTheLies]

sorry. you're not dumb. just frustrating me.

[Flubbernugget]

I feel the same way

[skitter30]

K, after re-reading this page like four times and reconsidering some stuff, I think I get what's happening? Maybe?

I still don't want to lynch Flubber today. I absolutely hate the way Fykus and UCV piled onto the Flubber wagon.