Are you always this awkward then? I asked you cause it was you that said it...
Thor, since Derpy is being unnecessarily awkward could you answer what VCA means please?
Are you always this awkward then? I asked you cause it was you that said it...
1. Yes I am.In post 525, wilky wrote:Are you always this awkward then? I asked you cause it was you that said it...
I mentioned wagon analysis - what I meant by that is assessing a wagon you were on though, not assessing your wagon.In post 520, wilky wrote:So what exactly is meant by my wagon analysis? I did join the UC wagon but I weren't the only one and quick joined it whilst saying it was a bad wagon. Also scum reading me but not reading my posts???
Vote Count Analysis.In post 520, wilky wrote:Derpy what does VCA mean?
No - you complained I hadn't made a case as an empty attack when I had made a case, I then pointed this out, you then re-set to the begining of the conversation for some reason.In post 521, Apple Jack wrote:Um. You asked me to respond to a case you didn’t make.
Dude - you don't get more info by claiming something doesn't exist. Don't be a dweeb.In post 521, Apple Jack wrote:My response back to you was my way of asking for information since I can’t respond to something that hasn’t been made.
You tried to blabber your way through a response and I followed it up with asking for specifics.
Don’t try to treat me like an idiot cause you are playing poorly.
Oh, wait, I'm sorry, I asked this question wrong.In post 527, Thor665 wrote:Also, since "playing poorly" is now your case on me.
How am I playing poorly exactly?
Are we going to do this again?In post 523, Apple Jack wrote:So basically you are promising somebody will flip scum without actually doing any work.In post 519, Thor665 wrote:I've basically read no posts by them, it's why I cited VCA and NK analysis as my case.
Yeah I don’t care if there is no cc.
VOTE: Thor
Impossible 2 separate players play this bad. It’s scum.
What's this about?In post 507, Apple Jack wrote:Ugh
I have no idea what your thoughts on me would be if you actually read my posts. Why not try it and see what you think? On that wagon I think that quick is scum for reasons I have already mentioned.In post 527, Thor665 wrote:I mentioned wagon analysis - what I meant by that is assessing a wagon you were on though, not assessing your wagon.In post 520, wilky wrote:So what exactly is meant by my wagon analysis? I did join the UC wagon but I weren't the only one and quick joined it whilst saying it was a bad wagon. Also scum reading me but not reading my posts???
I agree that you were not the only one on the UC wagon, I am more than willing to believe that there are town on that wagon. Who do you think are the scum on the wagon?
Quick's actions do sound suspect, when he shows up I'll ask about them.
Yes, I scum read you without reading your posts - why is that surprising? Do you think if I'd read your posts that I'd town read you? Why is this?
Vote Count Analysis.In post 520, wilky wrote:Derpy what does VCA mean?
No - you complained I hadn't made a case as an empty attack when I had made a case, I then pointed this out, you then re-set to the begining of the conversation for some reason.In post 521, Apple Jack wrote:Um. You asked me to respond to a case you didn’t make.
Dude - you don't get more info by claiming something doesn't exist. Don't be a dweeb.In post 521, Apple Jack wrote:My response back to you was my way of asking for information since I can’t respond to something that hasn’t been made.
You tried to blabber your way through a response and I followed it up with asking for specifics.
Don’t try to treat me like an idiot cause you are playing poorly.
As to "showing my work"
I already described my basic VCA thoughts, and you already indicated you understood and saw the NK analysis that I saw.
So what are you asking about exactly now?
Also, since "playing poorly" is now your case on me.
How am I playing poorly exactly?
the IC claimed and there has been no CC. That is reason enough for me not to vote them.In post 493, gameplay506 wrote:In post 483, Quick wrote:Well, right now I am considering you DH, and wilky. You haven't really seem much pressure except for the claimed IC Tracker.In post 482, gameplay506 wrote:Ye im waiting for cs and wilky to actually say something
Quick that shallow reasoning for voting me aint gonna pass on day 2You are either living with a couple of braincells or scum.In post 490, Quick wrote:We have zero wagons... We need to start doing... something to change that.
Why isn't tsq on the list?
The reasons for mescum are so outdated and bad so why am I a better vote than wilky?
I feel you are just going between me and tsq for the credit of going after the IC/SE. And that vote on me serves no meaning given your shallow reasoning, more like testing the waters.
VOTE: wilkyIn post 497, wilky wrote:Reads:
CS - Null
TSQ - Town due to no cc
Derpy - Null-Town
Gameplay - Null-Scum
Quick - scum
Taiho - Null
Activity very well can be AI. Don't play coy.
I believe that I explained the reads in the exact same post, I also think this is L-1...In post 538, Quick wrote:VOTE: wilkyIn post 497, wilky wrote:Reads:
CS - Null
TSQ - Town due to no cc
Derpy - Null-Town
Gameplay - Null-Scum
Quick - scum
Taiho - Null
For near pointless readslist.
Wow, I didn't even know it was L-1.In post 540, wilky wrote:I believe that I explained the reads in the exact same post, I also think this is L-1...In post 538, Quick wrote:VOTE: wilkyIn post 497, wilky wrote:Reads:
CS - Null
TSQ - Town due to no cc
Derpy - Null-Town
Gameplay - Null-Scum
Quick - scum
Taiho - Null
For near pointless readslist.
I’m not a fan of scum reads replacing out. I’m not a fan of who his replacement is.
Maybe when I have time to re-read but based off the misreps tbor made I don’t see any reason why I should. It’s fine if nobody else votes him. Y’all vote who you think is scum and I’ll vote who I think is scum.In post 533, gameplay506 wrote:Derpy i like you
but voting thor is dumb
place your vote on someone that is actually getting lynched
I'm considering it.In post 546, Apple Jack wrote:So vote meIn post 534, Quick wrote:DH looks worse than they did before IMO.
Its a semi-open setup, so you are playing wrong.In post 548, Apple Jack wrote:Regardless of alignment I play true to myself. I just don’t believe claims outright. The play ALWAYS decides my vote.
The lack of cc can be explained so it doesn’t mean he’s guaranteed town.