Newbie 1827: Baseball Game Over
-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
Not really. There is still a chance somebody isn’t cc’ing
Wednesday I’ll read up but for now I just can’t ignore his scummy misreps and how he promised somebody who’s posts he hasn’t even read is going to flip scum.
I’ll ignore his lie about day cop but generally speaking I hate liars but this was clearly a joke.I love MUFFINS!!!-
-
mhsmith0 Balancing Act
- Balancing Act
- Balancing Act
- Posts: 10830
- Joined: March 7, 2016
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
vc
Showhttp://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I didn't realize that we had this much time left in the day.
Going to
UNVOTE:-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I think Derp is town.In post 529, gameplay506 wrote:What are your other reads thor
Don't have any other reads, but from this page Quick looks like a person of interest also.
You refuse to state your reasoning on me, but find it scummy that you think I haven't?In post 531, Apple Jack wrote:And I’m not getting in a back and forth with Thor either. It won’t do this game any good so any attempts he makes to slander me are just that.
Dude...dude.
Breath, take like 12 hours away, and come back with the brain clicking a little sharper.
You are in a derpy tunnel Derp.
Define 'caught up'?In post 534, Quick wrote:@Thor665, are you caught up in the game? Who are your top 3 Town reads? What is suspicious about my play?
If by "read it all" then no, and I never will be.
If you mean "playing, offering and making reads" then yes.
I have no top 3 town reads yet, I don't even have 3 townreads at this stage.
I have two top scumreads currently, and since I only get one lynch that's actually a more functional situation - I'll get town reads as we go.
I refuse to go back and random read for a maybe chance that my read will change.In post 535, wilky wrote:I have no idea what your thoughts on me would be if you actually read my posts. Why not try it and see what you think? On that wagon I think that quick is scum for reasons I have already mentioned.
My read might maybe change if I spend a few days reading every game of every player in this game - that's not a valid reason to justify the time.
I agree with you loosely on Quick, how quick (::rimshot:: he was to leap on you off of a thin and subjective case seems like a thing.
But your reaction to the wagon on you isn't thrilling me much either.
Please describe the misrep you think I made.In post 545, Apple Jack wrote:Maybe when I have time to re-read but based off the misreps tbor made I don’t see any reason why I should. It’s fine if nobody else votes him. Y’all vote who you think is scum and I’ll vote who I think is scum.
Because the only thing I can think of is at best a disagreement, and I'd suggest you're the one misrepping at the moment., which makes that being an issue...annoying.
Please describe the misrep, so at least other people can see you're daft - thanks.
I gave you what you asked for about Wilky - would you like a link?In post 553, Apple Jack wrote:I want to see a case from thor. If he’s not going to make one nobody should shed him.
I want evidence he’s read the game and I want what I asked about wilky. I don’t want a lame excuse like he gave.
viewtopic.php?p=9710064#p9710064
I have not read the game, nor claimed I have, feel free to wait for evidence to the contrary as long as you wish.
I gave no lame excuse - I dealt with you asking a question in a passive aggressive rude way, and then you got more agrieved at me pointing that out.
:shrug:-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Oh, and
@Quick
Missed this the first time around.
At the time you asked, I actually hadn't said your play was suspect.
I said your actions as described by Wiky sounded suspect.
Do you agree that you did what he described?
If so - then why ask?
If not - then why ask?
As to why I suspect you now - you felt a little over eager with your vote shift.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
IDK what you mean by what wilky described. As far as I am aware, he never really threw an accusation at me recently.In post 555, Thor665 wrote:Oh, and
@Quick
Missed this the first time around.
At the time you asked, I actually hadn't said your play was suspect.
I said your actions as described by Wiky sounded suspect.
Do you agree that you did what he described?
If so - then why ask?
If not - then why ask?
As to why I suspect you now - you felt a little over eager with your vote shift.-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
I stated my reasons for both your predecessor AND you actually.In post 554, Thor665 wrote:You refuse to state your reasoning on me, but find it scummy that you think I haven't?
Pretty sure I asked thisIn post 554, Thor665 wrote:I gave you what you asked for about Wilky - would you like a link?
viewtopic.php?p=9710064#p9710064
“If you want to show me some posts wilky made that makes you so sure he is scum, i'd love to read them.”
And you said you didn’t read his posts or something so you haven’t given me what I asked for.
In post 554, Thor665 wrote:Please describe the misrep you think I made.
But I didIn post 519, Thor665 wrote:I mean you didn't really show your work or anything.
I agree, I wasn't asked to though
Saying “wagon analysis and Nk “ is a reason, not an explanation.In post 510, Apple Jack wrote:Or maybe explain why wilky is scum cause nobody should blindly sheep anyone.
“ex·pla·na·tion
ˌekspləˈnāSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
a statement or account that makes something clear”
I wasn’t left with a clear understanding. That’s why I asked you to show your work.
Nah I’m good. I’m not letting you attempt to power lynch somebody and risk having this game be mylo/lylo tomorrow.In post 554, Thor665 wrote:Breath, take like 12 hours away, and come back with the brain clicking a little sharper.
People getting lynched require cases with some sort of detail from everyone.I love MUFFINS!!!-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Go back and find where you found me talking about suspecting you that you asked about and you'll find his commentary also.In post 556, Quick wrote:IDK what you mean by what wilky described. As far as I am aware, he never really threw an accusation at me recently.
I agree that you asked me to do something not based around my case and that I did not provide it though responded to the request.In post 557, Apple Jack wrote:Pretty sure I asked this
“If you want to show me some posts wilky made that makes you so sure he is scum, i'd love to read them.”
And you said you didn’t read his posts or something so you haven’t given me what I asked for.
How scummy or me...?
Your case on me is a joke.
What's your read on Quick and why?-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
At least I made one. I don’t really care about your opinion of it.In post 558, Thor665 wrote:Your case on me is a joke.
The fact is if your slot is town, you both have set bad examples for new players.I love MUFFINS!!!-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I looked over the same thing. All he said was that I put him at L-1.In post 558, Thor665 wrote:
Go back and find where you found me talking about suspecting you that you asked about and you'll find his commentary also.In post 556, Quick wrote:IDK what you mean by what wilky described. As far as I am aware, he never really threw an accusation at me recently.
I unvoted because I didn't realize we had ~5 days left in the Day. I thought we had like 2. I also didn't realize I put him at L-1 because I forgot that gameplay voted for wilky. I don't usually pay attention to VC really. It just seems tedious to do so... for me at least.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
What do you mean he was trying to save wilky? Are you talking about D1?In post 560, Apple Jack wrote:I don’t like quick. He rubs me the wrong way and I don’t feel comfortable saying he’s town. I’m now figuring out what tsq was trying to do. He tried to save wilky and wanted to lynch quick. You are doing the opposite.
I don’t put bussing past you.-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Scratches head...In post 563, Apple Jack wrote:Yea
OK so you are kinda mixing up two different things here.
On the one hand, you are saying shea was trying save wilky on D1... what does that have to do with him trying to lynch me D2?-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
that's pre-flip tho?In post 565, Apple Jack wrote:If scum are tsq/wilky lynching you puts town in great shape.-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
While we are at it. Please give me your case on wilky.In post 529, gameplay506 wrote:Just vote wilkyI love MUFFINS!!!-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Not actually true, I explained my case on Wilky far more than you've explained your case on me even after being asked (and indirectly asked)In post 559, Apple Jack wrote:
At least I made one. I don’t really care about your opinion of it.In post 558, Thor665 wrote:Your case on me is a joke.
The fact is if your slot is town, you both have set bad examples for new players.
You have also now claimed that I'm generically bad twice.
I will ask again - how am I playing badly, and also why does that make me scum?
The fact that you can't answer that should explain to you that either you are scum, or that your case is based on annoyed feelings rather than anything approaching logic.
I advocate logic...though I have been told I'm "bad" so maybe I play wrong
I'm actually advocating a lynch on both of those slots, so make sure to assess me at least honestly with what I'm saying I want to do as opposed to strangely coming up with a world where I don't want to lynch Quick.In post 560, Apple Jack wrote:I don’t like quick. He rubs me the wrong way and I don’t feel comfortable saying he’s town. I’m now figuring out what tsq was trying to do. He tried to save wilky and wanted to lynch quick. You are doing the opposite.
I don’t put bussing past you.
But then again I play bad, so...-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Quick - can you explain why you were so quick to leap onto Wilky with me? Looking back over everything you posted this day phase does not leave me with a lot of impressions concerning your issues with Wilky. Why shouldn't I find your leap opportunistic and scummy?-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
no you didn't. You said NK and VCA. That's it. you didn't show your work on why the VCA points to ONLY wilky. I also asked you to provide me additional things because anyone who has played mafia as long as you and I have, should know that NK and VCA isn't enough and it isn't even always reliable.In post 569, Thor665 wrote:I explained my case on Wilky
how about your refusal to explain your case in detail with posts from wilky that make him look bad? you promised he is scum without even reading his posts (your own admission)In post 569, Thor665 wrote:I will ask again - how am I playing badly, and also why does that make me scum?
regardless of alignment it is bad play and your refusal to provide me the information I have asked for multiple times supports a scum read. Town should be transparent as possible and I don't feel like you have been.
That's funny because i'd expect somebody who advocates it to you know, actually use it? I don't feel you have used logic at all.In post 569, Thor665 wrote:I advocate logic
I feel like at this point if you are actually town (doubtful) you are wasting your time with me. You clearly aren't going to give me what I have asked for multiple times and because of that I am not even going to consider the possibility that I could just be wrong about you. I feel like if you were town, you'd want to try to convince people instead of arguing with them. you are arguing with me, not trying to convince me.
Until you show me your work that points to wilky as 100% scum on the VCA, show me your work on why the NK ONLY points to wilky being scum, and show me posts that wilky has made that implicate him as scum you words are lost on me.I love MUFFINS!!!-
-
Apple Jack Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: October 28, 2011
-
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 554, Thor665 wrote:
Define 'caught up'?In post 534, Quick wrote:@Thor665, are you caught up in the game? Who are your top 3 Town reads? What is suspicious about my play?
If by "read it all" then no, and I never will be.
I refuse to go back and random read for a maybe chance that my read will change.In post 535, wilky wrote:I have no idea what your thoughts on me would be if you actually read my posts. Why not try it and see what you think? On that wagon I think that quick is scum for reasons I have already mentioned.
My read might maybe change if I spend a few days reading every game of every player in this game - that's not a valid reason to justify the time.
I agree with you loosely on Quick, how quick (::rimshot:: he was to leap on you off of a thin and subjective case seems like a thing.
But your reaction to the wagon on you isn't thrilling me much either.
I have not read the game, nor claimed I have, feel free to wait for evidence to the contrary as long as you wish.
I gave no lame excuse - I dealt with you asking a question in a passive aggressive rude way, and then you got more agrieved at me pointing that out.
:shrug:
I don't get how you can be so sure of anyones alignment without reading at least a large part of the game. I mean I have to agree with Derpy in that its not good play and definitely won't help town.
I also don't agree that I have reacted badly to my wagon, I don't like the way you have voted for me without even reading my posts and I don't like the way Quick had put me on L-1 without stating and am not buying his reasons that he never realised either but I don't think that what I have said is actually reacting badly to a wagon and more just trying to figure out why you assume I am scum without actually reading anything and why Quick would do a scummy manoeuvre that could easily cause a mislynch.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I agree I never showed that, but then I never claimed it did.In post 571, Apple Jack wrote:no you didn't. You said NK and VCA. That's it. you didn't show your work on why the VCA points to ONLY wilky.
Other than you causing a delay to the answers to your questions (by not actually asking the question)In post 571, Apple Jack wrote:regardless of alignment it is bad play and your refusal to provide me the information I have asked for multiple times supports a scum read. Town should be transparent as possible and I don't feel like you have been.
And also ruling out stuff like the above, asking for support of stances I never made.
What information have I failed to be transparent about specifically?
I'll make non-transparent anything you can bring up.
That's a fair point; like what?In post 571, Apple Jack wrote:That's funny because i'd expect somebody who advocates it to you know, actually use it? I don't feel you have used logic at all.
Quote me saying it ONLY points to Wilky and I'll sheep your vote for the rest of every game we are ever in together and always claim that you are 10000x smarter than me in all things.In post 571, Apple Jack wrote:Until you show me your work that points to wilky as 100% scum on the VCA, show me your work on why the NK ONLY points to wilky being scum, and show me posts that wilky has made that implicate him as scum you words are lost on me.
Until then...whut?
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.