In post 399, Xiao Long wrote:Nevermind, I shouldn’t question anything Derpy does. I forgot I’m a bad player.
Flavor what happened to your wall tables?
In post 342, Apple Jack wrote:If I’m wrong about you. Improve your play next time and stop trying to do things intentionally to force people to town read you.In post 341, Xiao Long wrote:Except you’re 100% wrong about me, so I have little reason to trust you’re right about Wossi.
In post 345, Apple Jack wrote:Playing bad on purpose so people think that you are too bad to be scum.
Thank you. This is twice we’ve been on a similar page. Hopefully you are town this game also.In post 389, Tchill13 wrote:Derpy doesn't do stupid gambits that cause confusion for town. He's better than 80 percent of players on site for that ALONE.
They are actually. There are even a few mods who prohibit it in their game rules. Clearly others agree with it.In post 393, Xiao Long wrote:Fake hammers aren’t stupid gambits
No it translates to don’t rely on trickery. Rely on good old fashion scum hunting.In post 397, Xiao Long wrote:This post literally translates to:
“If you don’t play the way I want you to play, you’re stupid and shouldn’t play the game.”
Fake hammers and gambits almost never catch scum.In post 398, Xiao Long wrote:What kind of town will shit on something that has a possibility of catching scum? “
WHO CAAAAAARES?????In post 407, Apple Jack wrote:Fake hammers and gambitsIn post 398, Xiao Long wrote:What kind of town will shit on something that has a possibility of catching scum? “almostnever catch scum.
It’s almost like I warned people about me and yet people still wanted to tangle with meIn post 8, Apple Jack wrote:for the sake of not ruining the game on day 1, I’m probably just going to ask questions and process information and won’t actually start pushing to lynch my scum reads until day 2. This is unorthodox and some will find it scummy but I’m not really worried about that.
Cause they are stupid and shouldn’t be used cause they are ineffective.In post 409, Xiao Long wrote:WHO CAAAAAARES?????In post 407, Apple Jack wrote:Fake hammers and gambitsIn post 398, Xiao Long wrote:What kind of town will shit on something that has a possibility of catching scum? “almostnever catch scum.
You say almost, that's not a 100% thing, meaning there is a possibility of it. WHY DO YOU WANT TO REMOVE TOOLS THAT TOWN POSSESSES?
I have though. When your scum buddy gets lynched it’s cause I started it. He fucked up in the Hood/game and I exposed him.In post 411, Xiao Long wrote:Except you have been pushing lynches, you've just not put any votes down so you can be like, "Oh, he flipped town? Well, I wasn't voting for him."
You need to stop tossing around the term "conf town" so carelessly.In post 392, Tchill13 wrote:Anyways basically... Porkers conf town if Wossi flips scum. I like flavor leafs train of thought on his porkers vote he's prob town. Wossi decided to have more intricate detailed reads after my case on him. He's still scum. Vig still needs to shoot xl if possible.
You have what? Been pushing lynches? That's what I said. Your first post said you're not going to push lynches, but you have been pushing lynches.In post 413, Apple Jack wrote:I have though. When your scum buddy gets lynched it’s cause I started it. He fucked up in the Hood/game and I exposed him.In post 411, Xiao Long wrote:Except you have been pushing lynches, you've just not put any votes down so you can be like, "Oh, he flipped town? Well, I wasn't voting for him."
Nah, let him keep doing it. He can put himself in a box.In post 414, Nauci wrote:You need to stop tossing around the term "conf town" so carelessly.In post 392, Tchill13 wrote:Anyways basically... Porkers conf town if Wossi flips scum. I like flavor leafs train of thought on his porkers vote he's prob town. Wossi decided to have more intricate detailed reads after my case on him. He's still scum. Vig still needs to shoot xl if possible.
L O LIn post 418, Apple Jack wrote:Sorry for insulting you if you end up being town. I just dislike your playstle. To me it’s anti-town and ineffective. You make yourself look scummy because half the game wants to lynch you.
You can be mad at my harshness but it’s not my fault that multiple people think you are scum. That’s on you.
Ugh I just knew when you made that disclaimer you'd be quoting it down the line, like it somehow absolves you of all responsibility for your actions. Sorry, but you don't get to make an umbrella statement excusing yourself indefinitely. Why would town need or want this? You're self-aware enough to realize your play is problematic but make no effort to correct it?In post 410, Apple Jack wrote:It’s almost like I warned people about me and yet people still wanted to tangle with meIn post 8, Apple Jack wrote:for the sake of not ruining the game on day 1, I’m probably just going to ask questions and process information and won’t actually start pushing to lynch my scum reads until day 2. This is unorthodox and some will find it scummy but I’m not really worried about that.
In post 419, Apple Jack wrote:And I’m just ignore you from now on. Have a good life. Watch both ways when crossing the street.
In post 420, Nauci wrote:I personally find that reactions to gambits are the most telling posts that a lot of players make, and they've been effective in at least half the games I've played.
Derpy you could afford to relax a bit.
Wow, thank you Nauchos for confirming that I'm not going insane.In post 421, Nauci wrote:The stream of condescending and insulting posts make games a lot less fun for a lot of people. I'm not a fan. It also results in a lot of pages of NAI reactionary bickering posts that don't get us anywhere.
