I'll take this as a compliment. However, weekends are generally not a good time for me to post. I'm taking right now to catch up so I don't fall too far behind, and then going to bed. Tomorrow I work again, but can be around in the evening.In post 852, Lord Gurgi wrote:Chickadee and Porkens: I know you're smarter and can lend more to the town than you are currently.
From his posts I didn't really get him questioning the number of scum. It felt more like "Ok, but how does nauci know." He was questioning Nauci's knowledge. That to me seems scummy. I guess there was a bit of questioning the number of scum, but it really felt more based on questioning wether or not Nauci had information she should not have had.In post 867, Apple Jack wrote:Just thinking of past experiences. Majority of the time when a newbie questions the number of scum in a game they have been town. I’ve seen only once where scum faked it.In post 863, wavemode wrote:More to the point: what specifically about this latest exchange is making you turn around on your deathtunnel position?
My issue is he should have pointed it out sooner.
oddly scummy postIn post 840, Porkens wrote:XL, Ias far as I'm concerned it is you v. Wossi today. I don't think my side loses that fight either way.
Not really. Hunch, I guess? Besides my earlier comment that you liked to push tin foil theories which felt less useful.In post 802, Lord Gurgi wrote:Nauci can you explain your read on me?
First off, I actually just thought a 3 scum faction (with or without an SK) was normal for a 13 man game. Second, this posts read to me more like "HOW DID YOU KNOW WE HAVE 3 SCUM" instead of "HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE SETUP IS." Obviously I could be biased but still, that's my gut read of it.In post 835, Wossi wrote:Why would you assume there's three scum sharing a faction? No where on the wiki or in this games rules does it have any kind of number or indication.In post 832, Apple Jack wrote:Why is that vote worthy?In post 829, Wossi wrote:VOTE: NauciIn post 826, Nauci wrote:I assumed in a normal game of 13 people 3 scum is typical?In post 801, Wossi wrote:Nauci, how do you know there are more then two scum?
i'm frustrated because I'm the only one scum reading her and the majority of town is content to sheep/just wants the day to end and I'm feel like I'm going down with a sinking ship.
Pretty sure I pressured Chickadee and Porkens and XL and Dunk and tried to pressure Mumble lmaoIn post 837, Wossi wrote:Nobody is challenging her. Nobody is pushing her. She's doing scummy things and every one can't stop talking in circles over Derpy, Xiao Long, and myself. Thirty pages and only three players have been put under the microscope. There's no excuse for this. I can't believe I'm seeing multiple players saying they wish the day would just end when we still have eight irl days of game play lefts and a replacement who hasn't even caught up yet.In post 834, Porkens wrote:Nauci isn't coasting.In post 831, Wossi wrote:People need to stop letting Nauci coast. If they only way I'm gonna get taken seriously on this one is getting lynched and flipping green, so be it.
VOTE: wossi
XML, if you are town, I can't imagine you have a problem lynching wossi today.
Not enough posting. Like, I gave you town cred because your posting seemed like it was going to be very useful, but then you kind of didn't post nearly as much or have nearly as much impact as I had hoped.In post 815, Animetrix wrote:Interesting, what brought upon this change?In post 799, Nauci wrote:anime to null
I think this is a faked reaction because I (and I'm pretty sure someone else as well) declared that there's definitely a day scum chat, and someone even quoted me on it IIRC.In post 850, Wossi wrote:It just looks to me like scum trying to get guidance from a buddy
In post 891, davesaz wrote:Read stuff after my last catchup post. Got confused by the appearance of Gurgi, must have missed where the mod announced the replace-in.
@MOD: you haven't put me into Mumble's slot in the OP
Resuming catchup at page 17.
Advance warning, on Tuesday and Wednesday I need to actually pay attention at work and probably won't read or post during the day at all.
no thanksIn post 897, wavemode wrote:My compelling argument is all of dunker's posts are basically prodges
This can die
VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
