Ok.In post 897, wavemode wrote:My compelling argument is all of dunker's posts are basically prodges
This can die
VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
VOTE: dunkerdoodles
Ok.In post 897, wavemode wrote:My compelling argument is all of dunker's posts are basically prodges
This can die
VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
Because town should have no reason to believe I'm scum yet vote with me on dunker?In post 904, Porkens wrote:Why do you care why I'm sleeping you?
Yes.In post 908, Nauci wrote:Are you allowed to sleep with people you're playing mafia with? Are you allowed to play mafia with people you're sleeping with?
I think this is normal dunk.
Oh dear god I hope soIn post 908, Nauci wrote:Are you allowed to sleep with people you're playing mafia with? Are you allowed to play mafia with people you're sleeping with?
I think this is normal dunk.
Perhaps because I'm trying to sort them?In post 849, Wossi wrote:In post 239, Animetrix wrote:Can you expand on this? All I did was catch up. It would help me analyze you better. I personally don't see what I could have done in the catch up to make you think I'm one of your top town reads so far. But, perhaps that is just my skeptical nature.In post 229, Nauci wrote:Animetrix (shoutouts to Animatrix) as townyWhy does he only make these posts to Nauci?In post 815, Animetrix wrote:Interesting, what brought upon this change?In post 799, Nauci wrote:anime to null
In post 850, Wossi wrote:It just looks to me like scum trying to get guidance from a buddy
What he said. Also, this seem like a poor reason to push on someone. Do you really think that someone as scum would openly ask guidance from their partner? I find your logic flawed. Why did you not consider I was laying false associations as well? Because you have a one track mind on trying to force a scumread on me and not trying to sort me, that is why I think you are scum. You still haven't given a good reason for scum reading me at all, this being further proof, wossi.In post 851, Apple Jack wrote:Scum have day chat so they could get guidance in their pf.In post 850, Wossi wrote:It just looks to me like scum trying to get guidance from a buddy
Well this is an awful post. How does me posting = me being indicative of my alignment? I just happen to log on one time a day, so that automatically makes me less town? I don't understand what you mean by impact as well.In post 882, Nauci wrote:Not enough posting. Like, I gave you town cred because your posting seemed like it was going to be very useful, but then you kind of didn't post nearly as much or have nearly as much impact as I had hoped.
I agree. Also, the ones that aren't prodges are awful posts (the ones I quoted earlier.)In post 897, wavemode wrote:My compelling argument is all of dunker's posts are basically prodges
This can die
VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
It's not that I scum read you. It's more like I was town reading you because your posts showed you have a play style that would mean really good questions and engagement draw from others. I thought you'd have great potential to do that. But the hopes and expectations town read had a cool down and waned because the engagement and activity I'd thought you'd go on to extract from other players didn't really come to fruition. I want to see you ask alignment pulling questions of others that you asked of me. So null until then.In post 915, Animetrix wrote:Well this is an awful post. How does me posting = me being indicative of my alignment? I just happen to log on one time a day, so that automatically makes me less town? I don't understand what you mean by impact as well.In post 882, Nauci wrote:Not enough posting. Like, I gave you town cred because your posting seemed like it was going to be very useful, but then you kind of didn't post nearly as much or have nearly as much impact as I had hoped.
I feel like both of you have roughly the same number of useful/hunting posts.In post 897, wavemode wrote:My compelling argument is all of dunker's posts are basically prodges
This can die
VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
I'm astounded anyone can actually read the game and come to this conclusion. Reassess?In post 920, Nauci wrote:I feel like both of you have roughly the same number of useful/hunting posts.
Mostly cause I didn't really see the case on him to begin with, and his later interactions with Derpy seemed townish.
In post 923, Xiao Long wrote:Mostly cause I didn't really see the case on him to begin with, and his later interactions with Derpy seemed townish.
Plus some of the insistence on Wossi is bothering me.