So it's a lot of reasons why you continue to tunnel me. Most of which you've already said and I have already refuted. Then you're just saying intentional derp instead of what it is. Logical thought.In post 4346, Whiskers wrote:@MathbladeIn post 4343, Nero Cain wrote:read 4141 and give me your wordsIn post 4340, MathBlade wrote:Can we all just get along and play mafia?
Here is 4141 for you.
I don't remember you ever refuting this, for instance? All I remember is that you didn't see the reason for the votes on me, and didn't see a case, and so no case = no scum.In post 4141, Nero Cain wrote:more misrep. Never said anything about Math not thinking like that. I said that Math applying that to Flubber but not Whiskers is selective and scummy.
hot diggity damn, you're worse than quick, arne't you?Transcend wrote:But she's getting site banned so lol
Yes I already did.In post 4354, Whiskers wrote:@MathI don't remember you ever refuting this, for instance? All I remember is that you didn't see the reason for the votes on me, and didn't see a case, and so no case = no scum.In post 4141, Nero Cain wrote:more misrep. Never said anything about Math not thinking like that. I said that Math applying that to Flubber but not Whiskers is selective and scummy.
Or something along those lines.
Why this counterwagon stuff though?
hot diggity damn, you're worse than quick, arne't you?Transcend wrote:But she's getting site banned so lol
you do seem to be standing out quite a bit, yes.In post 4355, Transcend wrote:But there's outstanding circumstances
But you were pushing Flubber because he was the counterwagon. Despite the fact that he flipped Town, you couldn't have known at the time (unless you're scum), so why did you push flubber for being a counterwagon, while ignoring the fact that I was a counterwagon?In post 4356, MathBlade wrote:Yes I already did.In post 4354, Whiskers wrote:@MathI don't remember you ever refuting this, for instance? All I remember is that you didn't see the reason for the votes on me, and didn't see a case, and so no case = no scum.In post 4141, Nero Cain wrote:more misrep. Never said anything about Math not thinking like that. I said that Math applying that to Flubber but not Whiskers is selective and scummy.
Or something along those lines.
Why this counterwagon stuff though?
There is no contradiction only the one Nero made up.
Furthermore even if there was a contradiction (of which I disagree) Flubber flipped Town. This would also make you Town. So I don't want to respond to Nero's bullshit as he tunnels me every fucking game we are in. This is not becoming another Civ Mafia.
And saying I haven't doesn't mean I haven't either.In post 4359, Nero Cain wrote:So TIAM goes "There are no reasons to scumread Whiskers"
I ask if this was correct.
You then but in and misrep me.
That's not logical.
As scum all you have to do is not budge from whatever false narrative/opinion. Saying "I refuted that!"=//=refuting that.
um yeah there is. Like your ENTIRE case on Flubb was that Quick was his cw and he flipped town. If that was something you believed in you should believe that the same is true for Whiskers.In post 4356, MathBlade wrote:There is no contradiction only the one Nero made up.
the problem isn't that "all counterwagons flipped green and you pushed one" it's that your reasoning, whichIn post 4360, Whiskers wrote:But you were pushing Flubber because he was the counterwagon. Despite the fact that he flipped Town, you couldn't have known at the time (unless you're scum), so why did you push flubber for being a counterwagon, while ignoring the fact that I was a counterwagon?In post 4356, MathBlade wrote:Yes I already did.In post 4354, Whiskers wrote:@MathI don't remember you ever refuting this, for instance? All I remember is that you didn't see the reason for the votes on me, and didn't see a case, and so no case = no scum.In post 4141, Nero Cain wrote:more misrep. Never said anything about Math not thinking like that. I said that Math applying that to Flubber but not Whiskers is selective and scummy.
Or something along those lines.
Why this counterwagon stuff though?
There is no contradiction only the one Nero made up.
Furthermore even if there was a contradiction (of which I disagree) Flubber flipped Town. This would also make you Town. So I don't want to respond to Nero's bullshit as he tunnels me every fucking game we are in. This is not becoming another Civ Mafia.
Go fuck yourself, transphobic asswipe.In post 4349, Whiskers wrote:Yo Viomi I know it's a long fucking shot but
Send me a PM sometime because, like I said,
It's a conversation I'd like to have.
I'm truly open to having my mind changed about this,
but it's not the conclusion I came to on my own, or in discussion thus far.
So I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
Except Whiskers wasn't a counterwagon it was a wagon that formed at the same time. Furthermore I did not have a townread on Flub and did Quick and still do on Whiskers. A counterwagon is what I see based on reads. Not a wagon happened must be scum. <<See Mastina's VCA guide which is like the holy grail>>In post 4362, Nero Cain wrote:um yeah there is. Like your ENTIRE case on Flubb was that Quick was his cw and he flipped town. If that was something you believed in you should believe that the same is true for Whiskers.In post 4356, MathBlade wrote:There is no contradiction only the one Nero made up.
it really wasn't....In post 4365, MathBlade wrote:Except Whiskers wasn't a counterwagon it was a wagon that formed at the same time.
???In post 4364, Viomi wrote:Go fuck yourself, transphobic asswipe.In post 4349, Whiskers wrote:Yo Viomi I know it's a long fucking shot but
Send me a PM sometime because, like I said,
It's a conversation I'd like to have.
I'm truly open to having my mind changed about this,
but it's not the conclusion I came to on my own, or in discussion thus far.
So I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
Leave me alone.
It really was. We're not doing this. You're just gonna spam me scum a shit ton of times and then people will either policy or correctly lynch you. (I waffle between this.) We're not.In post 4366, Nero Cain wrote:it really wasn't....In post 4365, MathBlade wrote:Except Whiskers wasn't a counterwagon it was a wagon that formed at the same time.
Well true, it wasn't. Flubb was the counterwagon to Whiskers on d2. Just like Quick was the counterwagon to Flubber on d1. I think you are intentionally mixing up the terms and I know that fake derp is apart of your scum game.In post 4366, Nero Cain wrote:it really wasn't....In post 4365, MathBlade wrote:Except Whiskers wasn't a counterwagon it was a wagon that formed at the same time.
Whiskers is of the opinion that being transgender is sexistIn post 4367, MathBlade wrote:???In post 4364, Viomi wrote:Go fuck yourself, transphobic asswipe.In post 4349, Whiskers wrote:Yo Viomi I know it's a long fucking shot but
Send me a PM sometime because, like I said,
It's a conversation I'd like to have.
I'm truly open to having my mind changed about this,
but it's not the conclusion I came to on my own, or in discussion thus far.
So I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
Leave me alone.
What exactly is this in response to?? I think Whiskers is commenting on not reading Transcend's post the same way? Or is Whiskers saying trans people don't exist. /me is Lost
let's lynch the scum pr over your goon.In post 4368, MathBlade wrote:We should be lynching Smocaine.
Let's assume this is what Whiskers thinks.In post 4370, Viomi wrote:Whiskers is of the opinion that being transgender is sexistIn post 4367, MathBlade wrote:???In post 4364, Viomi wrote:Go fuck yourself, transphobic asswipe.In post 4349, Whiskers wrote:Yo Viomi I know it's a long fucking shot but
Send me a PM sometime because, like I said,
It's a conversation I'd like to have.
I'm truly open to having my mind changed about this,
but it's not the conclusion I came to on my own, or in discussion thus far.
So I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
Leave me alone.
What exactly is this in response to?? I think Whiskers is commenting on not reading Transcend's post the same way? Or is Whiskers saying trans people don't exist. /me is Lost
It's a very alt-right nazi propaganda opinion.
I cannot speak about other ongoing games. But my hate is more than justified.In post 4372, MathBlade wrote:Let's assume this is what Whiskers thinks.In post 4370, Viomi wrote:Whiskers is of the opinion that being transgender is sexistIn post 4367, MathBlade wrote:???In post 4364, Viomi wrote:Go fuck yourself, transphobic asswipe.In post 4349, Whiskers wrote:Yo Viomi I know it's a long fucking shot but
Send me a PM sometime because, like I said,
It's a conversation I'd like to have.
I'm truly open to having my mind changed about this,
but it's not the conclusion I came to on my own, or in discussion thus far.
So I'm not seeing what you're seeing.
Leave me alone.
What exactly is this in response to?? I think Whiskers is commenting on not reading Transcend's post the same way? Or is Whiskers saying trans people don't exist. /me is Lost
It's a very alt-right nazi propaganda opinion.
Believing trans people don't exist is evil and despicable. However through love is how hearts get changed. Throughout this entire game people have been calling me they or he. No one here in their heart of hearts believes I am female because I have boobs. Calling someone a nazi doesn't actually make them change. It makes them go "I am not a nazi, Hitler is evil, and my opinion is justified".
So how about we show love rather than the hate given and claim targets since you have claimed Jailkeeper?