1. Riiiight.In post 1405, Luca Blight wrote:1. No, even if you'd said 'bussing' instead of 'hard-bussing' I wouldn't have agreed with you. Bussing would be like what you're doing with UCV if you're partners - you are genuinely trying to get your partner lynched - the same doesn't apply to what NSG was doing if she was your partner. But if it stops this tedious discussion from continuing, then fine - you can be right on this one.
2. Maybe you have time to read and re-read everyone's ISO in minute detail, but I don't at the moment. Perhaps later I will have a bit of time, but I'm not sure why you don't just save everyone time and directly quote what it is you're referring to.
3. So what made you decide he is obv scum instead of lynchbait?
4. You considered the idea of lynching someone else, fine. You still chose to vote UCV regardless though and your current position seems to be that you're not budging from that vote.
5. Meh.
6. UCV? With a pinch of salt, perhaps. Toto seems a pretty reasonable player though and is certainly not coming to any rash conclusions.
7. Part of the problem is that whenever you do respond you are behind the play and a lot of what you are talking about loses relevance, hence why I asked for the discussion to be dropped. If this was a debating game then sure, I'd debate with you endlessly as you seem to enjoy doing, but so much of what you're saying isn't pertinent to what's actually going on in the game, nor is it helping me or presumably others ascertain a clearer read on you.
2. Frankly I was trying to get a reaction out of you either standing behind your ISO read being right (in which case I could catch you as a liar) or admitting that you did a shoddy job )which...eh, can be potentially read either way but I'd have probably called a town tell) instead you went with this middle road option.
3. Analysis of play, VCA, and other reads. Unless you're saying that I should have scum read Toto or thought Luca/NSG was a good team theory.
4. Okay, so now we agree I assessed the situation so you're moving the goalposts to complain that I'm confident on a vote that, if you are town, you now know is on scum. Cry me a river - my play must be terrible
5. Meh to you also.
6. Thus proving my point even if you struggle not to admit it. For instance, you now have to admit UCV is scum, but before you were arguing him as town and were peeved that I didn't follow Toto's plan - I just proved that a non-confirmed slot can have potentially superior reads to a confirmed one. You're welcome.
7. I find that to be an issue with the rest of you, frankly. I understand the logical flaw there - but I stand by the statement that their is no case on me, so all of you having trouble reading me are, methinks, doing something wrong.
I've answered the question twice now - what part of my answer confuses you?In post 1406, Toto wrote:Thor - thanks for pointing out all the inacuracies and logical fallacies in my statements. Can you now tell me who is scum between Luca and NSG, and also explain those reads? Ill keep repeating this until you either do that or I dont give a damn about this game anymore and vote you.
Also, in light of the UCV result - I endorse the one you don't.
I've already discussed the scummy stuff - you called it Newbie stuff.In post 1406, Toto wrote:UCV is now confirmed scum to you. Show me all the scummy stuff he has done, as well as Rc and zemaj.
What part of *that* answer didn't you understand?
I look forward to it.In post 1411, Toto wrote:If you are town we can chat about this after the game.
You have caught me.In post 1412, Toto wrote:My problem with Thor is that he is spending a lot of time arguing definitions, and talking about the logic of certain statements.
Apparently this is how Thor reads people, but this is also a good place to hide by scum as it is a lot easier for them to talk and argue about objective facts (Logic, Definitions, Etc) than it is to express subjective opinions and emotions they don't really believe or feel.
I am arguing logic, talking about objective facts, and not using emotions to vote.
How dare I?
What the hell? You're literally describing good play and complaining that I'm doing it.
From your perspective, yes.In post 1430, northsidegal wrote:if we take it that ucv is town then the scumteam has to be thor/luca, yes?
Lynching me or UCV?In post 1445, Toto wrote:Hey guys. I think we should get Thor’s opinion on that one first.
I support lynching UCV.
Putting me at L-1 to test NSG?
It's the same as lynching me tomorrow instead of her as far as game testing - so it's just a question of whether you want to accelerate the game to its endstage.
I don't support it due to knowing my alignment and not hers, but it's the same as lynching me, so if you're going to do that tomorrow regardless then doing it now is the same thing.
