Paradoxombie[4] (NabakovNabakov, cicero, Rogueben, Adel)
Xtoxm[1] (hasdgfas)
shaft.ed[1] (vollkan)
xyzzy[1] (Xtoxm)
hasdgfas[1] (Lawrencelot)
Adel[1] (Paradoxombie)
7 to lynch
If that question is directed at me as well, my answer is because there's a deadline in 3 days.vollkan wrote:Why don't you like Adel's tactics to the point of thinking she is a good lynch?Xtoxm wrote: PX, I don't like her tactics regarding me either, I think Adel would be a good lynch too.
what game have you played with me before?Paradoxombie wrote:I don't know, but I'd expect him to act the way he is now either way.shaft.ed wrote:So does he still know what he's doing paradox?
Unvote, Vote: Adel
I don't like her habit of not explaining herself, and I don't like her tactics regarding Xtoxm. Not sure if she's scum, but I think she's scummy, and deadline nears.
Why?shaft.ed wrote:hunchvote: xyzzy(sorry vollkan)
So did I, but that's not an excuse to totally drop off from posting in your games.Lawrencelot wrote:Sorry, guys, just got Brawl.
Elaboration please?Lawrencelot wrote: I realize there's a deadline, but I think Para and Xtoxm are both not very good lynches.
Again, elaboration please? And you're leaving yourself open to 3 entirely different lynches without even saying why you like them as a lynch? Scummy, to say the least.Lawrencelot wrote: I really want to lynch someone, however, but prefereably someone like Adel/xyzzy/hasdgfas.Unvote, switching to one of these three, whichever has the most votes.
A "feeling?" Is that the best you can muster with regards to a case on me and why I'm scummy?Lawrencelot wrote: hasdfgas: admittedly, I didn't realize there were 2 doc claims. Your explanation was sufficient, but still I have a feeling you're not very protown.
Lawrencelot wrote: I'll answer your questions when I have time.
Why?Xtoxm wrote:No I don't think he's a good lynch, How about xyzzy
Possible Thought: Xtoxm, do you have a Post Restriction? goodposting,Paradoxombie wrote:Going back a bit, I really don't like this.Lawrencelot wrote:switching to one of these three, whichever has the most votes.
This reminds meAdel wrote:There is no chance that he has a post restriction. The entire subject could be a ruse to distract us. There is a deadline.
look at the number and variety of his posts?
Is his style consistent with other games? Past games?
Only if the answer to those questions are all definitive should there be another post on the subject. Period.
NabakovNabakov wrote:NabakovNabakov wrote:This reminds meAdel wrote:Xtoxm: did you catch that paradox claimed doctor? And a name from Harry Potter?
Please read his posts and quickly tell us what you think of his alignment! You'll be dead soon and you won't be allowed to post in the thread anymore!
I wrote: @Adel: Straight up y/n:
Do you have a daykill?
You're overreacting. You know how long I didn't post? I posted more than Cicero. And Brawl IS a good excuse.hasdgfas wrote:So did I, but that's not an excuse to totally drop off from posting in your games.Lawrencelot wrote:Sorry, guys, just got Brawl.
Xtoxm because I don't think he would act like he did as scum. The reasons to not lynch Para are related to my own role pm.Elaboration please?Lawrencelot wrote: I realize there's a deadline, but I think Para and Xtoxm are both not very good lynches.
Adel, I dunno, she's making fun of people like Xtoxm, and it's mostly the vibes. I have a feeling she's not doing her best to catch scum, but my meta on Adel might be very different. I have reread your posts, and they don't seem scummy at all. I don't know why I thought you were scum, but the vote was because I thought you didn't believe Para's role at all. How sure are you that Para is lying/speaking the truth?Again, elaboration please? And you're leaving yourself open to 3 entirely different lynches without even saying why you like them as a lynch? Scummy, to say the least.Lawrencelot wrote: I really want to lynch someone, however, but prefereably someone like Adel/xyzzy/hasdgfas.Unvote, switching to one of these three, whichever has the most votes.
It had to do with my own role, partially. However, seeing your explanations, I think you're town. I don't want to lynch you.A "feeling?" Is that the best you can muster with regards to a case on me and why I'm scummy?Lawrencelot wrote: hasdfgas: admittedly, I didn't realize there were 2 doc claims. Your explanation was sufficient, but still I have a feeling you're not very protown.
Lol, I now see it was only one question. What you describe usually has to do with sentences like "I'm gonna reread" or "I'm gonna check out this player's posts".Lawrencelot wrote: I'll answer your questions when I have time.
You're posting, therefore you should have time to answer the questions posed to you. Posting something saying "I'll post an answer when I have time" has often meant (from what I've seen) "I'm going to say I'm going to answer the questions, but in reality I'll hope that he forgets about the questions." It's like active lurking, coming in to post "I don't have time to post now, wait until later" and then never doing it.
*hiss*shaft.ed wrote: hunch vote: xyzzy (sorry vollkan)
He said "hunch". That's a catch-all. It means he can avoid giving reasons. See my *hiss* above.xyzzy wrote:Why?shaft.ed wrote:hunchvote: xyzzy(sorry vollkan)
Supply reasons, or direct me to where you have previously given reasons. Thanks.Lawrencelot wrote: Sorry, guys, just got Brawl. I realize there's a deadline, but I think Para and Xtoxm are both not very good lynches. I really want to lynch someone, however, but prefereably someone like Adel/xyzzy/hasdgfas. Unvote, switching to one of these three, whichever has the most votes.
Interesting turn of phrase there.Lawrencelot wrote: hasdfgas: admittedly, I didn't realize there were 2 doc claims. Your explanation was sufficient,but still I have a feeling you're not very protown.I'll answer your questions when I have time.
If i'm alive when tonight comes, and you refuse to answer, I will attempt to use my one shot on you.Adel wrote:I'd answer it if only I could stop laughing so hard! It makes my fingers shake!