Open 699 - Pick your Poison - Town Win


User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1500 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:27 am

Post by ProHawk »

VOTE: Kelbris

I'm now scum for him...
User avatar
Fishythefish
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4362
Joined: November 2, 2008
Location: England

Post Post #1501 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:35 am

Post by Fishythefish »

@kelbris: your recent set of reads seems to be based almost completely on today - have you got any thoughts on things before that?

@DV: who is scum other than boring?
User avatar
havingfitz
havingfitz
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
havingfitz
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10118
Joined: July 1, 2009
Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!

Post Post #1502 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:50 am

Post by havingfitz »

In post 1500, ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Kelbris

I'm now scum for him...
So omgus on kelbris?
Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)

The shortest GTKAS thread ever!
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1503 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:31 am

Post by ProHawk »

So a bit of what Fishy said.
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1504 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:37 am

Post by ProHawk »

No I lied, I forgot he had voted me in the past, but it's pretty clear he isn't pushing his own reads with any degree of conviction, not to mention his reasoning for me being scum about trying to get him lynched before he got off of V/LA is quite an incorrect assessment and reaching IMO.
User avatar
mutantdevle
mutantdevle
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
mutantdevle
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3731
Joined: October 21, 2017
Location: Hell

Post Post #1505 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:54 am

Post by mutantdevle »

Just throwing this out there:

The scum decided not to attempt to fake claim a PR, so I think we can conclude that they are not really risk takers.
I mostly just lurk now.
User avatar
havingfitz
havingfitz
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
havingfitz
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10118
Joined: July 1, 2009
Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!

Post Post #1506 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:12 am

Post by havingfitz »

In post 1505, mutantdevle wrote:Just throwing this out there:

The scum decided not to attempt to fake claim a PR, so I think we can conclude that they are not really risk takers.
Why risk a confirmed scum kill in the next 1 or 2 lynches when as it stands...town could mislynch twice for a loss.
Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)

The shortest GTKAS thread ever!
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1507 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:59 am

Post by ProHawk »

In post 1505, mutantdevle wrote:Just throwing this out there:

The scum decided not to attempt to fake claim a PR, so I think we can conclude that they are not really risk takers.
I believe I alluded to this earlier when I said...
In post 1479, ProHawk wrote: I think everyone has spoken up since we finalized claims and scum have been less than tactical IMO which points to scum being in the lazier/low effort pool, of which Kelbris fits the bill quite well. I have played with DV before but I can't remember how good he is on that regard. Boring seems like she thinks things through pretty well, so I would have expected her as scum to have come up with a better plan...
How confident are you Fitz that scum would be able to get in two mis-lynches? It's a 40% chance to get caught the first time and a 50% chance the second... unless there is a cop inno and then its a 50% chance to get caught the first time and a 66% chance the second.

If they decided to put one scum into the PR pool, and one scum out of the PR pool and we lynch from the PR pool then if they survive the 3v3, it now becomes a 1v1. If for whatever reason we lynch correctly from the 1v1 then the last scum is in 3p LYLO, if we don't then they win, AND they have a partner to be able to help them lynch correctly. This doesn't even take into account the ability to discredit certain investigative PR's by throwing doubt into the mix.

Otherwise now, they are stuck in the 3 town 2 scum pool with two confirmed town players (potentially a 2 town 2 scum pool - if a cop has investigated).

I guess if they had an IC they were going up against, it would lower their chances in the PR pool pretty significantly though...

All in all a pretty tough situation to be in as scum, so I would have had the least town-read of the two jump into the PR pool and the most town-read to jump into the VT pool and just wait until it got down to 3p LYLO, but maybe that's just me?
User avatar
Fishythefish
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4362
Joined: November 2, 2008
Location: England

Post Post #1508 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:26 am

Post by Fishythefish »

I had a bit of speculation typed out about what scum might or might not do, but actually I think we shouldn't talk about it. I don't think there's valuable information in the lack of PR fakeclaims - any chain of logic is going to be super-tenuous - and talking about it with PRs might give scum some info we'd rather they didn't have.
User avatar
DeasVail
DeasVail
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
DeasVail
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 13313
Joined: October 7, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Australia

Post Post #1509 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:06 am

Post by DeasVail »

In post 1501, Fishythefish wrote:@DV: who is scum other than boring?
I don't know. I initially had Kelbris in mind, but recent events have caused me to question that. Personally I don't find it too helpful to do too much team speculation before flips are established, as I have found that it leads me astray more often than not. Given that the play from boring's slot is what I believe is most likely to come from scum, my ideal plan would be to lynch her and then work from there. I've made my case, and given that I do really think she is scum, I am not going to be giving up on this easily, but I am aware that I'm not getting much traction here. The tracker point is a fair one, and my disagreement with it is both a result of a different approach to game theory, as well as just a stronger belief on my end that boring is scum. My argument would honestly be to ignore the tracker results (given the high false negative rate) and just look at her posts and make a judgement from that.
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1510 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:13 am

Post by ProHawk »

In post 1508, Fishythefish wrote:I had a bit of speculation typed out about what scum might or might not do, but actually I think we shouldn't talk about it. I don't think there's valuable information in the lack of PR fakeclaims - any chain of logic is going to be super-tenuous - and talking about it with PRs might give scum some info we'd rather they didn't have.
If anyone decides at this point to change their claims, they should be auto-lynched.
User avatar
DeasVail
DeasVail
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
DeasVail
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 13313
Joined: October 7, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Australia

Post Post #1511 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:14 am

Post by DeasVail »

In post 1498, havingfitz wrote:1. Why ask?
2. His chances of being scum are less than people not potentially tracked.
Who's your second most suspect?
Boring can be sorted tomorrow after PRs are known.
It was a rhetorical question.

And 2. I think I already answered to some degree, but I will elaborate. If we're going purely by PR mechanics, then yes, boring would not be the person to lynch, but that's not what the game is about. I think that boring is scum, I think her posting comes from scum, I think the way she has played the game is more likely from scum than from town to a degree that outweighs the decreased likelihood established by a negative track result. I am very hesitant to take an approach of "just sort her out tomorrow" because my prediction is that a negative tracker result would still have the same overly strong sway tomorrow as it seems to be having today. If I absolutely need to, then I will work out who else I would be willing to lynch, but I'm not going to give up on this easily.
User avatar
Fishythefish
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4362
Joined: November 2, 2008
Location: England

Post Post #1512 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:41 am

Post by Fishythefish »

In post 1510, ProHawk wrote:If anyone decides at this point to change their claims, they should be auto-lynched.
Sure. That's not what I mean - assuming all the claims are true, I think the discussion on claim strategy could reveal information about which PR is which (and I also think that discussion has little or no value).
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1513 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:59 am

Post by ProHawk »

I would disagree, as it points to scum-personality.
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1514 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:00 pm

Post by ProHawk »

Among other things...
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1515 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:01 pm

Post by ProHawk »

In post 1505, mutantdevle wrote:Just throwing this out there:

The scum decided not to attempt to fake claim a PR, so I think we can conclude that they are not really risk takers.
Just curious, had they fake-claimed a PR, what would your plan have been exactly?
User avatar
boring
boring
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
boring
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1538
Joined: June 15, 2016

Post Post #1516 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:10 pm

Post by boring »

Compare Deas's posts today with these games where he was town
viewtopic.php?t=72397&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
viewtopic.php?t=63443&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
He's easy, breezy, beautiful DeasVail.

Deas's Scum game: this is the Deas we're seeing.
viewtopic.php?t=62742&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
User avatar
boring
boring
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
boring
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1538
Joined: June 15, 2016

Post Post #1517 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:24 pm

Post by boring »

In post 1507, ProHawk wrote: All in all a pretty tough situation to be in as scum, so I would have had the least town-read of the two jump into the PR pool and the most town-read to jump into the VT pool and just wait until it got down to 3p LYLO, but maybe that's just me?
I was thinking that at first, but we stand to lose too much now from a real PR's continued secrecy. I'm sure everyone here realizes that. Mutant's little gambit was one thing. Letting us be dead-wrong all day (and possibly all the way to a town loss) is another.

Also, the only player left that I would think capable of being so bold as to fake claim in a massclaim is Fitz. But his enthusiasm would have been hard to fake. He was so excited to tell us he was PR and do the three option thingy.
User avatar
boring
boring
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
boring
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1538
Joined: June 15, 2016

Post Post #1518 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:51 pm

Post by boring »

In post 1509, DeasVail wrote: I am not going to be giving up on this easily, but I am aware that I'm not getting much traction here.
In post 1511, DeasVail wrote: If I absolutely need to, then I will work out who else I would be willing to lynch, but I'm not going to give up on this easily.
You're not going to "give up on this" until you have no choice but to vote Kelbris. Prohawk is off the table until we know which of mutant's results are true, and you've no chance against Fishy right now in public opinion.

Your best strategy would have been to come in today with a hard bus on Kelbris. Instead, you're stuck pretending to scum read me.
User avatar
kelbris
kelbris
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kelbris
Goon
Goon
Posts: 593
Joined: November 26, 2014
Location: NSW, Australia

Post Post #1519 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:01 pm

Post by kelbris »

Well, I am not gonna change my claim, since I am honestly a VT. I would also like to say, how is it reaching for suspecting someone that makes posts like #1484 and #1486 are rushing for a lynch on me? I will post my reads (based on all days) ASAP. However my opinion on ProHawk being scum will not change, based on what his slot has done in the past during this game. Finally, keep in mind that there are 2 scum, meaning that just because one of them may not have gone anywhere, does NOT mean they are inno.
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1520 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:24 pm

Post by ProHawk »

I didn't even vote you rofl, might be hard to get you lynched without a vote...
User avatar
Fishythefish
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4362
Joined: November 2, 2008
Location: England

Post Post #1521 (ISO) » Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:04 pm

Post by Fishythefish »

In post 1516, boring wrote:Compare Deas's posts today with these games where he was town
viewtopic.php?t=72397&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
viewtopic.php?t=63443&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
He's easy, breezy, beautiful DeasVail.

Deas's Scum game: this is the Deas we're seeing.
viewtopic.php?t=62742&f=53&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
This is good stuff, actually. That scum game is way more analytical and cold than the town ones, and matches DV here better.

I don't particularly like kelbris's play today; I think kelbris is trying to survive and say stuff rather than hunt scum. But I'm more confident in a
VOTE: DeasVail

It may turn out to be wishful thinking, but I'm kind of feeling we've nailed both the scum here.
User avatar
havingfitz
havingfitz
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
havingfitz
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10118
Joined: July 1, 2009
Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!

Post Post #1522 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:45 am

Post by havingfitz »

In post 1517, boring wrote:But his enthusiasm would have been hard to fake.
Any perceived enthusiasm was unintentional.
Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)

The shortest GTKAS thread ever!
User avatar
havingfitz
havingfitz
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
havingfitz
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10118
Joined: July 1, 2009
Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!

Post Post #1523 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:17 am

Post by havingfitz »

In post 1500, ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Kelbris

I'm now scum for him...
Who would be your alternate to a kelbris lynch?
Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)

The shortest GTKAS thread ever!
User avatar
ProHawk
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ProHawk
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6211
Joined: July 26, 2012

Post Post #1524 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:22 am

Post by ProHawk »

Lemme check interactions and get back to you

Return to “Completed Open Games”