Yea. You should have blown him up instead of sending me.
__________________
In post 79, Illy Pump wrote:Okay, next person to post has the opportunity to tell me who I should vote and why for the next 15 pages. If they make compelling cases, I will vote who they want me to vote. If not, I will vote them.
Town points for this.
In post 136, Torn Up wrote: In post 121, Activate the Zord wrote:
i'm wagoning someone because building wagons is good, i don't scumread anyone who's posted, and those are players who will actually react to being wagoned. and, the bonus of people getting to sort me and everyone who voted on the wagon i'm screaming to happen.
let me respond to this as well since the thread is stale.
1 - building wagons for no reason pollutes the thread with non alignment indicative posting since everyone is just trolling around;
2 - you don't need to vote anyone if you don't scumread anyone;
3 - All players react to being wagoned, but being wagoned before you got to post must generate the most null reactions from players, as they are fairly sure there is no good reason for the wagon on them and can easily shrug it off;
4 - it would be easier to sort you and everybody else without this.
well that's my take on it anyway.
Town points for this!
In post 139, Activate the Zord wrote: In post 136, Torn Up wrote: In post 121, Activate the Zord wrote:
i'm wagoning someone because building wagons is good, i don't scumread anyone who's posted, and those are players who will actually react to being wagoned. and, the bonus of people getting to sort me and everyone who voted on the wagon i'm screaming to happen.
let me respond to this as well since the thread is stale.
1 - building wagons for no reason pollutes the thread with non alignment indicative posting since everyone is just trolling around;
2 - you don't need to vote anyone if you don't scumread anyone;
3 - All players react to being wagoned, but being wagoned before you got to post must generate the most null reactions from players, as they are fairly sure there is no good reason for the wagon on them and can easily shrug it off;
4 - it would be easier to sort you and everybody else without this.
well that's my take on it anyway.
1 - no, we are actively discussing other things and not trolling. i mean, i do both, but trolling is fun!
2 - yes, you really do, not voting anyone is how games stagnate
3 - you can't always shrug it off easily, quicklynches and lolhammers happen, and once you get wagoned trying to shrug it off and coming off scummy just means you already have a massive wagon on you and screws you. there was no poster i wanted to wagon
4 - really? then what makes this bad play and not scum motivated? do you not garner any info from 3 people sheeping a case on someone who hasn't posted? their individual posts around voting? if your answer is you gained info, you're welcome.
goodnight
Sorry no town points.
In post 146, Torn Up wrote:oh yeah, the lolhammers are great for reading into alignments isn't it zord
isn't it great when day lasts nothing and then town PR gets lynched for no reason? hey guys let's put a slot in L-1 and then see who hammers
#wolfhunting
But it would give us info on who was willing to join this awful wagon. But still, not enough for it to be a good option for wagon.
Seriously the Uzikita wagon so far is stupid. The basis for starting it was neither of them had posted, as far as I can find.
In post 180, Not So Perfect wrote:....you literally presented it as information to consider.
For me, set up spec is a brilliant way to look busy, or profound. In a game this nutty, it's a total waste of time.
But, what were you trying to achieve by it?
I agree with the first line here. As a post though, it comes up null.
In post 183, Torn Up wrote: In post 180, Not So Perfect wrote:....you literally presented it as information to consider.
For me, set up spec is a brilliant way to look busy, or profound. In a game this nutty, it's a total waste of time.
But, what were you trying to achieve by it?
Why are you interjecting into someone else's push? That post was aimed at Zor. You could have given the interaction time to play out before jumping to a half-baked conclusion.
And why do I need to look busy? Tor is busy enough for us both without me needing to resort to set-up spec as so-called game filler. Weak.
~ Cheeky
Oh snap good point there. Already town reading you though. I suppose you can have another town point if you want it.
These three together, I just find hilarious.
In post 238, Not So Perfect wrote:I'm bad at fishing, is true.
Come chat to me? I do better one on one. Ask me stuff, Whatever.
I really like that you invite someone to look at you closer/1v1. Seems sincere. Town.
In post 241, Mobb Deep wrote:im aware of the deadline but i think we should end the day within the next 10 pages because no one is going to be able to do anything with cluttered noise and shit and scum is going to sweep.
i would say almost chara but lol , A FIFTY hasnt posted yet has he
illy pump is "scumhunting" but has a vanity vote at present lol
pedit: it's bellaphant/klick
pl in op
This is bad. Like really bad. Someone else "ew"'d this, can't remember who, and someone else asked what was "ew" about it, but I didn't check closely enough to see if that was ever answered.
Saying we should end the game in x-time frame, when we have good content going on is what makes it so bad to me. I woke up to 12 pages and still haven't thought "omg I regret this." To me, that's a sign of a productive game so far.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
