It seemed to me like he was saying theIn post 1201, Luca Blight wrote:Moz' post is BS. He is the one who wanted a Zaraki lynch over a Sesq one, and then he says I'm scummy for lynching Zaraki over Sesq?
did comm get it right early on??In post 622, CommKnight wrote:It's actually a pretty good move, because all i have to go on here is the paranoia that scum are smart enough to figure such a strategy out and efficiently push it. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if 1-2 scum actually is in Luca's list solely so he gets town cred for it. In this nightless game he really needs town cred to win. Because every kill requires a majority of town to lynch every single person, so if there were say... 3 hard-town in a block, they'd need to now mislynch everyone else without ever losing a person or they get fucked. But if they were to have 1-2 in that hard-town block, now they can lynch freely and throw suspicion outside of it to bring themselves to a LYLO position.
It's just a theory... but I think it's a possible scenario that should not be overlooked the entire game if it seems we're constantly mislynching people, look at those pushing the mislynches.
But he misrepped the manner in which I switched wagons - I gave a valid reason for doing so, and I've made it known I scumread Zaraki more than Sesq throughout the game.In post 1202, CultOfAthena wrote:It seemed to me like he was saying theIn post 1201, Luca Blight wrote:Moz' post is BS. He is the one who wanted a Zaraki lynch over a Sesq one, and then he says I'm scummy for lynching Zaraki over Sesq?mannerin which you switched wagons was scummier, moreso than the vote itself.
Why do you think Moz as scum tries to push you, here?
I thought Zaraki was scum. You didnt seem very convinced, and were very keen on a Sesq lynch. But then the Sesq wagon stalled and it just seemed the way you switch wagons was a bit opportunistic. Like "Shit, Moz aint gonna vote Sesq, lets get this Zaraki mislynch through while i can".In post 1201, Luca Blight wrote:He is the one who wanted a Zaraki lynch over a Sesq one, and then he says I'm scummy for lynching Zaraki over Sesq?
then why werent you pushing the zaraki wagon? Why did you push Sesq if you have scumread Zaraki throughout the entire game. Was it because Sesq was becoming unpopualr at the time and so she seemed an easier mislynch?In post 1205, Luca Blight wrote:But he misrepped the manner in which I switched wagons - I gave a valid reason for doing so, and I've made it known I scumread Zaraki more than Sesq throughout the game.
depends on the playstyle, but certainly a lot of scum would just sheep you/buddy you so you vote the wrong way at LYLO. So, no.In post 1205, Luca Blight wrote:Why wouldn't Mozscum push me here? Undermining the player with the most towncred is necessary if he wants to have any chance of winning the game.
yes, thats what was weird. You have scum read Zaraki all game, but then you started pushing Sesq instead.In post 1209, Luca Blight wrote:I've scumread Zaraki since UCV was lynched.
No, not really haha. At this point the game is kinda...finished. I think this will be my last nightless game. It kinda ends up going in a system that makes the game more of a bureaucracy then mafia itself.In post 1191, CultOfAthena wrote:@Cy– There's a good chance that you could be today's lynch. Last thoughts? Things we should keep in mind?
sounds like disheartened scum gving up.In post 1217, cytheflyguy wrote:No, not really haha. At this point the game is kinda...finished. I think this will be my last nightless game. It kinda ends up going in a system that makes the game more of a bureaucracy then mafia itself.
Again tho, end justifies the mean. I'm fine with being lynched because this is already a done deal.
Again, dude, when I flip town, it'll change nothing in the end. Arguing will just belabor our inevitable victory. If we still have not gotten scum by final 4 people, then we should stop doing this method, but until then, we need to get rid of all loose ends.In post 1200, mozamis wrote:We MUST hear from Cy before we lynch.
You haven't played with me. I'm kinda opportunistic. My death will benefit the town. I've said this like 3 game days ago when I wasn't on the chopping block. This is a really effective process and shouldn't be wasted.In post 1219, mozamis wrote:sounds like disheartened scum gving up.In post 1217, cytheflyguy wrote:No, not really haha. At this point the game is kinda...finished. I think this will be my last nightless game. It kinda ends up going in a system that makes the game more of a bureaucracy then mafia itself.
Again tho, end justifies the mean. I'm fine with being lynched because this is already a done deal.
Okay, so my thing is if I die, we have 5 people left. If we can believe that there is 1 scum left, we'll have 2 more chances until lylo. There are no night kills. Because of this, we can try to find scum without the repercussions of losing obvious town. No matter if we catch scum today or 3 days from now, we still win regardless. If scum still isn't caught by around the 4 people left mark, then we should take as much time as possible, but by then, the line of suspects will be limited and it will be easier to find who scum is.In post 1222, mozamis wrote:or we could get scum now and win? Dont understand the suicidal approach. I have seen town lose from here. THATS WHY I POSTED THAT GAME which obv no one looked at.
WHo do you think is scum anyway?
This is bad. Three planned lynches put us in LyLo if scum still isn't caught. You should make a list of 2 and then play it by ear after that. If scum isn't in that pool, you could give them leverage by having wagons to hide behind until LyLo and not look suspicious.In post 1224, Luca Blight wrote:Moz, do you accept that the next three lynches need to be cy, Athena and yourself?