Open 701: Pick Yer Power X/Y Game Over!

[Viomi]

So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?

Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?

[Viomi]

i've pretty much started skipping over most of what mutant is saying.

Umm, can you not do that thanks? It's incredibly nieve of you to ignore me just because you think I am scum. What if you are wrong? Then you have basically ignored the opinion of a townie who is trying to help people along. Surely you cannot be that confident in your reads that you are willing to just write players off over it. Additionally, even if I am scum then shouldn't you still be listening to what I have to say so that you know who to look into next if I were to flip? The idea of ignoring someone is just flawed no matter what.

Wait, mutant

Did you just tell nsg to read your posts?

[Viomi]

Not a fan really of the way Viomi is interacting. Just really seems like they're not putting a lot of critical thought into the process.

Last chain post, promise.

texcat, this is the only reasoning your scumbuddy gave in the post you linked me. Are you saying that's satisfactory and not at all scummy? Her vague "oh I don't like the way she's interacting" and "she's not using a lot of critical thought"

Which is ironic because her "interacting" is lurking the entire game and jumping in to sheep occasionally which clearly must take a lot of critical thinking.

[mutantdevle]

i've pretty much started skipping over most of what mutant is saying.

Umm, can you not do that thanks? It's incredibly nieve of you to ignore me just because you think I am scum. What if you are wrong? Then you have basically ignored the opinion of a townie who is trying to help people along. Surely you cannot be that confident in your reads that you are willing to just write players off over it. Additionally, even if I am scum then shouldn't you still be listening to what I have to say so that you know who to look into next if I were to flip? The idea of ignoring someone is just flawed no matter what.

Wait, mutant

Did you just tell nsg to read your posts?

Kek, I suppose I just did :3

It’s in a different context and I used a lot more words to do so though.

[Viomi]

i've pretty much started skipping over most of what mutant is saying.

Umm, can you not do that thanks? It's incredibly nieve of you to ignore me just because you think I am scum. What if you are wrong? Then you have basically ignored the opinion of a townie who is trying to help people along. Surely you cannot be that confident in your reads that you are willing to just write players off over it. Additionally, even if I am scum then shouldn't you still be listening to what I have to say so that you know who to look into next if I were to flip? The idea of ignoring someone is just flawed no matter what.

Wait, mutant

Did you just tell nsg to read your posts?

Kek, I suppose I just did :3

It’s in a different context and I used a lot more words to do so though.

It'd suck if she started asking you questions you've already answered and misrepresenting you because of it. I can't imagine how infuriating it'd be if the only posts she didn't ignore were the ones of you telling her to read your posts.

[Creature]

So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?

Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?

Because they're high in the list (and I townread texcat).

[Viomi]

Also can we stop this whole "it's less of a risk to lynch people lower on the list" bullshit? Draft order is NAI. Which numbers scum would or wouldn't pick is WIFOM. Not only that, if scum has good PRs, we could be looking at more than one death tonight or a scum roleblocker stopping our PRs. It isn't less of a risk to lynch me, because then you're risking letting scum PRs live too long.

Vote people who you think are actually scummy. People who are cruising along in the background while we make conspiracy theories about what numbers scum would pick.

[Viomi]

So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?

Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?

Because they're high in the list (and I townread texcat).

Why in the world do you townread texcat?

[Elmo TeH AzN]

Vote Count 2.11

CommKnight (4) - Aster, Chip Butty, northsidegal, KidAmn,
Creature (1) - CityElectric
northsidegal -
Aster -
texcat -
Viomi (2) - Lalendra, texcat,
mutantdevle -
Chip Butty (2) - mutantdevle, CommKnight
Lalendra (2) - Viomi, Creature
CheekyTeeky -
CityElectric -
KidAmn -

Not Voting: CheekyTeeky
With 12 Alive. Takes 7 To Lynch. 6 To No Lynch.
Deadline Timer (expired on 2017-12-25 07:00:00)

[/color][/b]

[mutantdevle]

i've pretty much started skipping over most of what mutant is saying.

Umm, can you not do that thanks? It's incredibly nieve of you to ignore me just because you think I am scum. What if you are wrong? Then you have basically ignored the opinion of a townie who is trying to help people along. Surely you cannot be that confident in your reads that you are willing to just write players off over it. Additionally, even if I am scum then shouldn't you still be listening to what I have to say so that you know who to look into next if I were to flip? The idea of ignoring someone is just flawed no matter what.

Wait, mutant

Did you just tell nsg to read your posts?

Kek, I suppose I just did :3

It’s in a different context and I used a lot more words to do so though.

It'd suck if she started asking you questions you've already answered and misrepresenting you because of it. I can't imagine how infuriating it'd be if the only posts she didn't ignore were the ones of you telling her to read your posts.

Luckily I will be capable of pointing her to the posts where I have answered those questions by saying "you can find my answer to that in post [insert number here]". Either that or I'll just simply answer the question again since I want my opinions to be known and clear and obviously if they have had to ask the question then I didn't make my original answer clear enough or it simply didn't stand out enough for it to be noticeable. After all, surely it'd be much easier for me to restate my own opinion which I should know off by heart instead of letting them get the wrong idea of me in their confusion?

[Creature]

So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?

Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?

Because they're high in the list (and I townread texcat).

Why in the world do you townread texcat?

Her pushes on me and stuff like this:

Some of the reads below are POE. For example, I have a town read on Aster because I don't think Aster and Viomi can both be scum.

Texcat - 2

Northsidegal - 3

Assemblerotws - 4

CommKnight - 6
Mutantdevle - 8

MisaTange - 30

CityElectric - 5

Chip Butty - 5

Wilky - 7

Creature - 7

Lalendra - 7

Aster - 1

Pisskop - 1

Viomi - 1

even though her reads are pretty wrong.

[Creature]

Maybe not that wrong.

[Creature]

So now who do we discuss about?

[Viomi]

So we can strike out texcat, Viomi, mutant, CK, north, KidAmn and me from lynch options for today, right?

Why would we strike out texcat or nsg?

Because they're high in the list (and I townread texcat).

Why in the world do you townread texcat?

Her pushes on me and stuff like this:

Some of the reads below are POE. For example, I have a town read on Aster because I don't think Aster and Viomi can both be scum.

Texcat - 2

Northsidegal - 3

Assemblerotws - 4

CommKnight - 6
Mutantdevle - 8

MisaTange - 30

CityElectric - 5

Chip Butty - 5

Wilky - 7

Creature - 7

Lalendra - 7

Aster - 1

Pisskop - 1

Viomi - 1

even though her reads are pretty wrong.

This is the only, ONLY time texcat has mentioned her reads, by the way. You say "stuff like this" but there is no other stuff like that, that's literally the only post from them with any kind of information.

And it's all hilariously off and doesn't make sense from a town perspective because they aren't actually trying to get reads, just blend in.

[Creature]

Actually it makes perfect sense.

[Creature]

In any way, we're not lynching texcat today nor tomorrow atleast.

[Viomi]

Actually it makes perfect sense.

You do realize every single one of her townreads in that list is/was a hard lurker with no information or positions, right?

[Viomi]

Actually it makes perfect sense.

You do realize every single one of her townreads in that list is/was a hard lurker with no information or positions, right?

She even explicitly states that the only exception to this rule, Aster, isn't on there because of anything other than she thinks we can't be scum together and she scumreads me.

[Creature]

Any other player we can discuss about?

[Viomi]

Any other player we can discuss about?

Why do you have to make townreading you so difficult..

[Creature]

Because I need to do more than get townread to win.

[Creature]

texcat's posts have been pretty coherent and I don't think scum!texcat is capable of being that coherent.

[KidAmn]

Alright lesdothis
LEEEEEEEEROOOY mmmJenkins

Vote: CommKnight

@Mod

Fixed Thanks

Cheeky, you're doing a lot of arguing for wagons (well, not a lot of arguing for wagons, but quite a few posts with not much to them... oh, you know what I mean) and not much committing to any of them.

I'll lynch Creature, Viomi or Comm today.

Three of the most towniest players. Cheeky is a scummy or a VI.

This feels like distancing and I would very much like to take a look at Cheeky when CommKnight flips scum

texcat's posts have been pretty coherent and I don't think scum!texcat is capable of being that coherent.

This is a somewhat dangerous assumption to make

[Creature]

Do you want to take a look at CheekyTeeky now? Or CheekyTeeky is only scummy if CK flips scum?

[Viomi]

Do you want to take a look at CheekyTeeky now? Or CheekyTeeky is only scummy if CK flips scum?

CT is scummy regardless of CK's alignment, at least to me.